References
- Ash S, Hay N. Adhesive pre-coated brackets, a comparative clinical study. Br J Orthod 1996; 23: 325–9.
- Millett DT, Hallgren A, Cattanach D, et al. A 5-year clinical review of bond failure with light-cured resin adhesive. Angle Orthod 1998; 68: 351–6.
- O’Brien KD, Read MJF, Sandison RJ, Roberts, CT. A visible light-activated direct-bonding material: an in vivo comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 95: 348–51.
- Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Am J Orthod 1978; 74: 62–78.
- Smith NR, Reynolds IR. A comparison of three bracket bases: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1991; 18: 29–35.
- Kinch AP, Taylor H, Warltier R, Oliver RG, Newcombe RG. A clinical trial comparing the failure rates of directly bonded brackets using etch times of 15 or 60 seconds. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1988; 94: 476–83.
- Brannstrom M, Nordenvall KJ, Malmgren O. The effect of various pretreatment methods of the enamel in bonding procedures. Am J Orthod 1978; 74: 522–30.
- Larmour CJ. An audit of orthodontic appliance breakages. RCS Eng Orthod Audit Newsletter 2000; 13: 3.
- Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength force testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994; 21: 33–43.
- Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 333–40.
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorial data, Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–74.
- Shapiro SS, Wilk MN. An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 1965; 52: 606–9.
- Tiku ML, A new statistic for testing suspected outliers, Commun Stat Theory 1975; 3: 485–93.
- Shapiro SS. How to Test Normality and Other Distributional Assumptions. Milwaukee: American Society for Quality Control, 1980.
- Gehan EA. Generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily single-censored samples. Biometrika 1965; 52: 203–23.
- Breslow N. A Generalized Kruskal–Wallis test for comparing K samples subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Biometrika 1970; 57: 579–94.
- Dickinson PT, Powers JM. Evaluation of fourteen direct bonding bases. Am J Orthod 1980; 78: 630–9.
- Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 171–8.
- Larmour CJ, Stirrups DR. An ex vivo assessment of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in relation to bonding technique. J Orthod 2001; 28: 207–10.
- Cardoso PE, Sadek FT, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Adhesion testing with the microtensile method: effects of dental substrate and adhesive system on bond strength measurements. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4: 291–7.
- ISO TS 11405. Dental Materials — Testing Methods of Adhesion to Tooth Structure. ISO Geneva: 2003.
- Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 114: 80–7.
- Bowen RL, Rodriguez MS. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962; 64: 378–87.
- Katona TR. A comparison of the stresses developed in tension, shear peel, and torsion strength testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112: 44–251.