How readable are orthodontic patient information leaflets?

References

• Locker D. An Introduction to Behavioural Science and Dentistry. London: Routledge, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Witt E, Bartsch A. The effect of information and communication in the orthodontic consultation. Part 1: the imparting of information. Fortsch Kieferorthop 1993; 54: 187–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ley P. Communicating with Patients. London: Chapman and Hall, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Nanda RS, Kierl MJ. Prediction of co-operation in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992; 102: 15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratelli P, Gelbier S, Gibbons DE. Lack of knowledge among parents, of the implications of receiving orthodontic treatment. Comm Dent Hlth 1996; 13: 211–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ley P. Comprehension, memory and success of communications with the patient. J Inst Hlth Educ 1972; 10: 23–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gauld VA. Compliance and recall. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 1981; 83: 298–300.
   Google Scholar
• George C, Waters W, Nicholas J. Prescription information leaflets: a pilot study in general practice. Br Med J 1983; 287: 1193–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ormrod J, Robinson M. How readable are health education leaflets? Hlth Visitor 1994; 67: 424–5.
   Google Scholar
• Moll JMH. Doctor patient communication in rheumatology. Studies of visual and verbal perception using educational booklets and other graphic material. Ann Rheum Dis 1986; 45: 198–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop P, Kirwan J, Windsor K. The Arc Patient Literature Evaluation Project. Chesterfield: Arthritis and Rheumatism Council, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Weinman J. Providing written information for patients: psychological considerations. J Roy Soc Med 1990; 83: 303–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert T, Chadwick S. How readable are practice leaflets? Br Med J 1992; 305: 1266–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett J, Bridger P. Communicating with patients. Br Med J 1992; 305: 1294.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland J. Readability. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Irwan VD, Wilson NW. An Evaluation of Dental Health Literature. St Paul: Bruce Publishing Co., 1942.
   Google Scholar
• NIH. Pretesting in Health Communications. NIH publication No. 81:1493. Bethesda: Government Printing Office, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Redman B. The Process of Patient Education. St Louis: Mosby, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccio JF, Ceccio CM. Effective Communication in Nursing Theory and Practice. Chichester: Wiley and Sons, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Smart JM, Burling D. Radiology and the Internet: a systematic review of patient information resources. Clin Radiat 2001; 56: 867–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adult Literacy and Basic Skills Unit. Making it Happen: improving basic skills within the Health Service. London: ALBSU, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Doak C, Doak L, Root J. Teaching patients with low literacy skills, 2nd edn. New York: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bakdash MB, Odman PA, Lang AL. Distribution and readability of periodontal health education literature. J Periodont 1983; 54: 538–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton JT. The readability and utility of general dental practice patient information leaflets: an evaluation. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 329–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander RE. Readability of published dental educational materials. J Am Dent Ass 2000; 131: 937–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne S, Large S, Jarrett N, Turner P. Written information given to patients and families by palliative care units: a national survey. Lancet 2000; 355: 1792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alessandro DM, Kingsley P, Johnson-West J. The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web. Arch Pediat Adolesc Med 2001; 155: 807–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freda MC, Damus K, Merkatz IR. Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphlets. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 771–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesch R. A new readability yardstick. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32: 221–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plain English Campaign. Available at: www.plainenglish.co.uk (accessed 22 February 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Coey L. Readability of printed educational materials used to inform potential and actual osteomates. J Clin Nurs 1996; 5: 359–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal National Institute for the Blind. Making Print Legible. London: RNIB, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Health Information Quality (CHIQ). Available at: http://www.hfht.org/chiq/(accessed 22 February 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Meade CD, Smith CF. Readability formulas: cautions and criteria. Patient Educ Counsel 1991; 17: 153–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutts M. The Plain English Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Blinkhorn AS, Verity JM. Assessment of the readability of dental health education literature. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979; 7: 195–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearth-Holmes M, Murphy PW, Davis TC, et al. Literacy in patients with a chronic disease: systemic lupus erythematosis and the reading level of patient education materials. J Rheumatol 1997; 24: 2335–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis TC, Mayeaux EC, Fredikson D, Bocchini JA, Jackson RH, Murphy PW. Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. Pediatrics 1994; 93: 460–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson AM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. A comparison of information retention at an initial orthodontic consultation. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 169–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphris GM, Duncalf M, Holt D, Field EA. The experimental evaluation of an oral cancer information leaflet. Oral Oncol 1999; 35: 575–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayeaux EC, Murphy PW, Arnold C, Davis TC, Jackson RH, Sentell T. Improving patient education for patients with low literacy skills. Am Fam Physician 1996; 53: 205–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney T, Wilson RG, Purves IN, et al. A PIL for every ill? Patient information leaflets (PILs): a review of past, present and future use. Fam Pract 1998; 15: 471–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patient Agreement to Orthodontic Treatment. Available at: www.bos.org.uk (accessed 22 February 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Consent Form 3. Available at: www.doh.gov.uk (accessed 22 February 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Disability Discrimination Act. Department for Education and Employment. Code of Practice. Rights of Access. Goods, facilities and premises. London: Stationary Office; 1995.
   Google Scholar