References
- Clark WJ. The Twin Block technique. A functional orthopedic appliance system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93(1): 1–18.
- Chadwick SM, Banks P, Wright JL. The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. Dent Update 1998; 25(7): 302–8.
- Mills JR, The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. Br J Orthod 1991; 18(4): 267–75
- Falck F, Frankel R. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Frankel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96(4): 333–41.
- Du X, Hagg U, Rabie AB. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24(2): 167–74.
- Malmgren O, Omblus J. Treatment with an orthopaedic appliance system. Eur J Orthod 1985; 7(3): 205–14.
- Banks P, Wright J, O’Brien K. Incremental versus maximum bite advancement during twin-block therapy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004: 126(5): 583–8.
- Gill DS, Lee RT. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127(4):465–72
- DeVincenzo JP, Winn MW. Orthopedic and orthodontic effects resulting from the use of a functional appliance with different amounts of protrusive activation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96(3):181–90.
- Carmichael GJ, Banks PA, Chadwick SM. A modification to enable controlled progressive advancement of the twin block appliance. Br J Orthod 1999; 26(1): 9–13.
- Eden SE, Kerr WJS, Brown J. A clinical trial of light cure acrylic resin for orthodontic use. J Orthod 2002: 29(1): 51–55.