The Dynamax System: A new orthopaedic appliance and case report

References

• Bass NM. The aesthetic analysis of the face. Eur J Orthod 1991; 13: 343–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial Keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning – Parts I and II, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103: 299–312, 395–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel R. Decrowding during eruption under the screening influence of vestibular shields. Am J Orthod 1974; 65: 372–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic A. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. St. Louis: Mosby, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bass NM. Dento-facial orthopaedics in the correction of Class II malocclusion. Br J Orthod 1982; 9: 3–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bass NM. Orthopedic co-ordination of dento-facial development in skeletal class II malocclusion in conjunction with edgewise therapy. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983; 84: 361–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bass NM. Orthopedic co-ordination of dento-facial development in skeletal class II malocclusion in conjunction with edgewise therapy. Part II. Am J Orthod 1983; 84: 466–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark WJ. Twin block functional therapy: applications in dento-facial orthopaedics. London: Mosby-Wolf, 1995; 265–67.
   Google Scholar
• Cura N, Saraç M, Öztürk Y, Sürmeli N. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activator, Activator – HG Combination and Bass appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance- its biological effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 1986; 8: 215–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A Cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982; 82: 104–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodside DG, Metaxas A Altuna G. The influence of functional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodelling. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 92: 181–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodelling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 607–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voudouris JC, Woodside DG, Altuna G, et al. Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment, Part 1. New technological methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 604–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voudouris JC, Woodside DG, Altuna G, Kuftinec MM, Angelopolous G, Bourke PJ. Condyle-fossa modifications and muscle interactions during Herbst treatment Part 2. Results and conclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 13–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cura N, Sarac M. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 1997; 19: 691–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cura N, Sarac M. Influence of Bass orthopaedic appliance system on electomyographic activity of masticator muscles. Eur J Orthod 1990; 12: 484 (Abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Pancherz H. Malmgren O, Hagg U, Omblus J, Hansen K. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Eur J Orthod 1989; 11: 17–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass NM. The Dynamax System: A New Orthopedic Appliance. J Clin Orthod 2003; 37: 268–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabie ABM, Hagg U. Factors Regulating mandibular condylar growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 401–09.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falck F, Frankel R. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Frankel appliance. Am J Orthod 1989; 96: 333–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sessle BJ, Woodside DG, Bourque P, et al. Effect of functional appliances on jaw muscle activity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 98: 222–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund IL, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks: A prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998, 113: 104–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du X, Hagg U,Rabie ABM. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24: 167–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagg U; Rabie ABM. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 477–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakr A, Rabie M, Chayaanupatkul A, Hagg U. Stepwise advancement using fixed functional appliances: Experimental perspective. Semin Orthod 2003; 9: 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bass NM. Innovation in Skeletal II Treatment including effective incisor root torque in a preliminary removable appliance phase. Br J Orthod 1976; 3: 223–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with thr Twin Block appliance; a multicenter, randomised, controlled trial. Part I; Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 234–43.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell S, Cook P. Predicting the outcome of twin block functional appliance treatment: a prospective study, Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 533–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan MM, Gianelly AA. The use of the lingual arch in the mixed dentition to resolve incisor crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 81–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teuscher U. An appraisal of growth and reaction to extra oral anchorage. Am J Orthod 1986; 89: 113–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bendeus M, Hagg U, Rabie ABM. Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with headgear-activator appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 376–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonagh S, Moss JP, Goodwin P, Lee RT. A prospective optical surface scanning and cephalometric assessment of the effect of functional appliances on the soft tissues. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 115–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander FG. Der Nachteffekt bei der Anwenndung der Vorschubdoppelplatte. Prakt Kieferorthop. 1989; 3: 97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, R. A Clinical evaluation of a locking orthodontic facebow. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 344–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar