59
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Scientific Section

An ex vivo laboratory study to determine the static frictional resistance of a variable ligation orthodontic bracket system

, &
Pages 112-118 | Received 10 Dec 2006, Accepted 25 Nov 2007, Published online: 16 Dec 2014

References

  • Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher HA. Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989; 96: 397–404.
  • Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Friction between different wire-bracket configurations and materials. Semin Orthod 1997; 3: 166–77.
  • Bednar JR, Gruendeman GW, Sandrik JL. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991; 100: 513–22.
  • De Franco DJ, Spiller RE, von Fraunhofer JA. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations. Angle Orthod 1995; 65: 63–74.
  • Schumacher HA, Bourauel C, Drescher D. The effect of the ligature on the friction between bracket and arch [Abstract]. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1990; 51: 106–16.
  • Sims APT, Waters NE, Birnie DJ, Pethybridge RJ. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a pre-adjusted bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J Orthod 1993; 15: 377–85.
  • Sims AP, Waters NE, Birnie DJ. A comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement ex vivo through three types of pre-adjusted brackets when subjected to determined tip or torque values. Br J Orthod 1994; 21: 367–73.
  • Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 106: 472–80.
  • Pizzoni L, Ravnholt G, Melsen B. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 283–91.
  • Thomas S, Sherriff M, Birnie D. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20: 589–96.
  • Read-Ward GE, Jones SP, Davies EH. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems. Br J Orthod 1997; 24: 309–17.
  • Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 295–305.
  • Edwards GD, Davies EH, Jones SP. The ex vivo effect of ligation technique on the static frictional resistance of stainless steel brackets and archwires. Br J Orthod 1995; 22: 145–53.
  • Altman DG. How large a sample? In: Gore SM, Altman DG (Eds). Statistics in Practice: Articles from the British Medical Journal. London: British Medical Association, 1982, 6–7.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–10.
  • Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Influence of archwire and bracket dimensions on sliding mechanics: derivations and determinations of the critical contact angles for binding. Eur J Orthod 1999; 21: 199–208.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.