References
- Birnie D, Harradine N. Self-ligating brackets. Seminars in Orthod 2008; 14.
- Birnie D, Harradine N. Excellence in Orthodontics Lecture Course Manual 2009.
- Eliades T, Pandis N. Self-ligation in Orthodontics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
- Damon D. Treatment of the face with biocompatible orthodontics. In Graber L, Vanarsdall R, Vig K (eds.). Orthodontics: current principles and techniques, 4th Edn. St Louis, MO: Elsevier, 2005, 753–832.
- Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligating bracket systems Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994; 106: 472–80.
- Matasa CG. Brackets’ shape influences friction. The Orthodontic Materials Insider 2001; 13: 2–5.
- Pandis N,Bourauel C, Eliades T. Changes in the stiffness of the ligating mechanism in retrieved active self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007; 132: 834–37.
- Thorstenson BS, Kusy RP. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2001; 120: 361–70.
- Thorstenson BS, Kusy RP. Comparison of resistance to sliding between different self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and saliva states. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002; 121: 472–82.
- Thorstenson BS, Kusy RP. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2002; 122: 295–305.
- Thorstenson BS, Kusy RP. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the wet and dry state. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 418–30.
- Turnbull NR, Birnie DJ. Treatment efficiency of conventional versus self-ligating brackets: the effects of archwire size & material. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007; 131: 395–99.
- Harradine N. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Resh 2001; 4: 220–27.
- Eberting J, Straja S, Tuncay OC. Treatment time, outcome and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod and Res 2001; 4: 228–34.
- Tagawa D. The Damon system vs. conventional appliances: a comparative study. Clin Impressions 2006; 15: 4–9.
- Miles PG, Weyant RJ, Rustveld L. A clinical trial of Damon 2 vs conventional twin brackets during initial alignment. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 480–85.
- Miles PG. SmartClip versus conventional twin brackets for initial alignment: is there a difference? Australian Orthod J 2005; 21: 123–27.
- Miles PG. Self-ligating versus conventional twin brackets during en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007; 132: 223–25.
- Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Self-ligation vs. conventional brackets in the treatment of mandibular crowding: a prospective clinical trial of treatment duration and dental effects. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007; 132: 208–15.
- Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon 3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008; 134: 470.e1–470.e8.
- Fleming PS, DiBiase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Efficiency of mandibular arch alignment with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009; 135: 597–602.
- Fleming PS, Di Biase AT, Sarri G, Lee RT. Pain experience during initial alignment with a self-ligating and a conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 46–50.
- Scott P, Sherriff M, DiBiase AT, Cobourne MT. Perception of discomfort during initial orthodontic tooth alignment using a self-ligating or conventional bracket system: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2009; 30: 227–32.
- Pringle AM, McKnight MM, Petrie A, Cunningam SJ. An RCT comparing pain associated with two fixed appliance systems. J Orthod 2008; abstract 54.
- Badawi H, Toogood RW, CareyJPR, Heo G, Major PW. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008; 133: 721–28.
- Pandis, Strigou S, Eliades T. Maxillary incisor torque with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a prospective clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2006; 9: 193–98.
- Badawi H et al. Three-dimensional orthodontic force measurements: high upper cuspid. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, in press.
- Baccetti T, Franchi L, Camporesi M, Defraia E, Barabato E. Forces produced by different nonconventional bracket or ligature systems during alignment of apically displaced teeth. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 533–39.