In vitro shearing force testing of two seventh generation self-etching primers

References

• MG Buonocore. A simple method of increasing the adhesionof acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. JDent Res 1955; 34: 849–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GV Newman. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments:progress report. Am J Orthod 1965; 51: 901–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• J Farah, Powers J. The Dental Advisor: self-etching bonding agents. JCan Dent Assoc 2004; 70: 446–47.
   Google Scholar
• JM Powers, Sakaguchi RL. Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials. StLouis, MO: Mosby Elsevier, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• SE Bishara, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. Effect of a self-etch primer/adhesive on theshear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am JOrthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 621–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RW Arnold, Combe EC, Warford JHJr. Bonding of stainless steel brackets to enamelwith a new self-etching primer. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop 2002; 122: 274–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S Asgari, Salas A, English J, Powers J. Clinical evaluation of bond failure rateswith a new self-etching primer. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36: 687–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• YD Aljubouri, Millett DT, Gilmour WH. Six and 12 months’ evaluation of a self-etchingprimer versus two-stage etch and prime for orthodontic bonding: a randomizedclinical trial. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 565–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JE dos Santos, Quioca J, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Six-month bracket survival with a self-etchadhesive. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 863–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N Manning, Chadwick SM, Plunkett D, Macfarlane TV. A randomized clinical trial comparing ‘one-step’and ‘two-step’ orthodontic bonding systems. JOrthod 2006; 33: 276–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• N Pandis, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Failure rate of self-ligating and edgewisebrackets bonded with conventional acid etching and a self-etching primer:a prospective in vivo study. AngleOrthod 2006; 76: 119–22.
   Google Scholar
• P Banks, Thiruvenkatachari B. Long-term clinical evaluation of bracket failurewith a self-etching primer: a randomized controlled trial. JOrthod 2007; 34: 243–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• A Khalha. No difference in the failure rates of orthodonticbrackets bonded with self-etching primer. Evid BasedDent 2008; 9: 79–80.
   Google Scholar
• A Reis, dos Santos JE, Loguercio AD, de Oliveira Bauer JR. Eighteen-month bracket survival rate: conventionalversus self-etch adhesive. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 94–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JP Cal-Neto, Quintao CA, Almeida MA, Miguel JA. Bond failure rates with a self-etching primer:a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop 2009; 135: 782–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UB Fritz, Diedrich P, Finger WJ. Self-etching primers — an alternativeto the conventional acid etch technique? J OrofacOrthop 2001; 62: 238–45.
   Google Scholar
• E Paschos, Westphal JO, Ilie N, Huth KC, Hickel R, Rudzki-Janson I. Artificial saliva contamination effects onbond strength of self-etching primers. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 716–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Holzmeier, Schaubmayr M, Dasch W, Hirschfelder U. A new generation of self-etching adhesives:comparison with traditional acid etch technique. JOrofac Orthop 2008; 69: 78–93.
   Google Scholar
• WA Wiltshire, Noble J. Clinical and laboratory perspectives of improvedorthodontic bonding to normal, hypoplastic, and fluorosed enamel. SeminOrthod 2010; 16: 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• HeinrichHeine Universitat Dusseldorf Institute fur Experimentelle Psychologie. Düsseldorf:The Institution; C2010. Available at: http://www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de/abteilungen/aap/gpower3/ (accessed 5 August 2011).
   Google Scholar
• BR Nemeth, Wiltshire WA, Lavelle CL. Shear/peel bond strength of orthodontic attachmentsto moist and dry enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 396–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Driessen, Coetzee W, van Biljon BD, Sonnekus H. Results of the Bencor multi-T System for testingshear and tensile bond strength (Abstract). J DentRes 1989; 68: 726.
   Google Scholar
• SE Bishara, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strengthof glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• T Turk, Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D. Effects of self-etching primer on shear bondstrength of orthodontic brackets at different debond times. AngleOrthod 2007; 77: 108–12.
   Google Scholar
• SE Bishara, Oonsombat C, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF. Comparison of the shear bond strength of 2self-etch primer/adhesive systems. Am J Orthod DentofacialOrthop 2004; 125: 348–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SE Bishara, Otsby AW, Ajlouni R, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. A new premixed self-etch adhesive for bondingorthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 1101–04.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A Klocke, Shi J, Vaziri F, Kahl-Nieke B, Bismayer U. Effect of time on bond strength in indirectbonding. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 245–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LJ Oesterle, Shellhart WC. Effect of aging on the shear bond strengthof orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 716–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B Trites, Foley TF, Banting D. Bond strength comparison of 2 self-etchingprimers over a 3-month storage period. Am J OrthodDentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 709–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RJ Scougall Vilchis, Yamamoto S, Kitai N, Yamamoto K. Shear bond strength of orthodontic bracketsbonded with different self-etching adhesives. Am JOrthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 425–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GT Minick, Oesterle LJ, Newman SM, Shellhart WC. Bracket bond strengths of new adhesive systems. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 771–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar