References
- MR Inglehart, Bagramian RA. Oral health-related quality of life: an introduction.In MR Inglehart, Bagramian RA (eds.). Oral health-related quality of life. Chicago,IL: Quintessence Publishing, 2002, 1–6.
- E Bernabé, Sheiham A, de Oliveira CM. Impacts on daily performances attributed tomalocclusions by British adolescents. J Oral Rehabil 2009; 36: 26–31.
- LS Marques, Filogônio CA, Filogônio CB. Aesthetic impact of malocclusion inthe daily living of Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod 2009; 36: 152–59.
- C O’Brien, Benson PE, Marshman Z. Evaluation of a quality of life measure forchildren with malocclusion. J Orthod 2007; 34: 185–93.
- ES Traebert, Peres MA. Do malocclusions affect the individual’soral health-related quality of life? Oral Health PrevDent 2007; 5: 3–12.
- NA Mandall, Wright J, Conboy F, Kay E, Harvey L, O’Brien KD. Index of orthodontic treatment need as a predictorof orthodontic treatment uptake. Am Orthod DentofacialOrthop 2005; 128: 703–07.
- M Zhang, McGrath C, Hägg U. The impact of malocclusion and its treatmenton quality of life: a literature review. Int J PaediatrDent 2006; 16: 381–87.
- LS Marques, Pordeus IA, Ramos-Jorge ML. Factors associated with the desirefor orthodontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents and their parents. BMCOral Health 2009; 9: 34.
- M Zhang, McGrath C, Hägg U. Changes in oral health-related quality oflife during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 25–29.
- M Chen, Wang DW, Wu LP. Fixed orthodontic appliance therapy and itsimpact on oral health-related quality of life in Chinese patients. AngleOrthod 2010; 80: 49–53.
- E Bernabé, Sheiham A, Oliveira CM. Impacts on daily performances related to wearingorthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 482–86.
- GM Doll, Zentner A, Klages U, Sergl HG. Relationship between patient discomfort, applianceacceptance and compliance in orthodontic therapy. JOrofac Orthop 2000; 61: 398–413.
- HG Sergl, Klages U, Zentner A. Functional and social discomfort during orthodontictreatment — effects on compliance and prediction of patients’adaptation by personality variables. Eur J Orthod 2000; 22: 307–15.
- NA Mandall, Vine S, Hulland R, Worthington HV. The impact of fixed orthodontic applianceson daily life. Community Dent Health 2006; 23: 69–74.
- PD Johnson, Cohen DA, Aiosa L, McGorray S, Wheeler T. Attitudes and compliance of pre-adolescentchildren during early treatment of Class II malocclusion. ClinOrthod Res 1998; 1: 20–8.
- IBGE(Brazilian Geography and Statistics Institute). Availableat: http://www.ibge.com.br(acessed
- 2010) October.
- NC Cons, Jenny J, Kohout FJ, Freer TJ, Eismann D. Perceptions of occlusal conditions in Australia,the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America. IntDent J 1983; 33: 200–06.
- WorldHealth Organization. Oral Health Surveys. Basic Methods,4th Edn. Geneva: WorldHealth Organization, 1997.
- CS Torres, Paiva SM, Vale MP. Psychometric properties of the Brazilianversion of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ11–14) —short forms. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7: 43.
- A Jokovic, Locker D, Stephens M, Kenny D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Validity and reliability of a questionnairefor measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. JDent Res 2002; 81: 459–63.
- M Zhang, McGrath C, Hägg U. Patients’ expectations and experiencesof fixed orthodontic appliance therapy: impact on quality of life. AngleOrthod 2007; 77: 318–22.
- A Jokovic, Locker D, Guyatt G. Short forms of Child Perceptions Questionnairefor 11–14-year-old children (CPQ11–14): developmentand initial evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006; 4: 4.
- CM de Oliveira, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oralhealth-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. JOrthod 2004; 31: 20–27.
- Z Marshman, Gibson BJ, Benson PE. Is the short-form Child Perceptions Questionnairemeaningful and relevant to children with malocclusion in the UK? JOrthod 2010; 37: 29–36.