Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography in orthodontic patients

References

• Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dento-Maxillo-Facial Radiol 2009; 38: 187–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radiation protection: Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines (v2·0 final) 2011 SEDENTEX CT. Available from http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/guidelines_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oberoi S, Chigurupati R, Gill P, Hoffman WY, Vargervik K. Volumetric assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting using cone beam computed tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009; 46: 503–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kau CH, Pan P, Gallerano RL, English JD. A novel 3D classification system for canine impactions-the KPG index. Int J Med Robot 2009; 5: 291–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Zhang W, Zhang Z, Wu Y, Ma X. Localization of impacted maxillary canines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popat H, Drage N, Durning P. Mid-line clefts of the cervical vertebrae — an incidental finding arising from cone beam computed tomography of the dental patient. Br Dent J 2008; 204: 303–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers SA, Drage N, Durning P. Incidental findings arising with cone beam computed tomography imaging of the orthodontic patient. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 350–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles DA. Occult pathology detected in cone beam data volumes. Alpha Omegan 2010; 103: 146–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pazera P, Bornstein MM, Pazera A, Sendi P, Katsaros C. Incidental maxillary sinus findings in orthodontic patients: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Orthod Craniofac Res 2011; 14: 17–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pliska B, DeRocher M, Larson BE. Incidence of significant findings on CBCT scans of an orthodontic patient population. Northwest Dent 2011; 90: 12–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cha JY, Mah J, Sinclair P. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 7–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim WK, Ram B, Fasulakis S, Kane KJ. Incidental magnetic resonance image sinus abnormalities in asymptomatic Australian children. J Laryngol Otol 2003; 117: 969–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havas TE, Motbey JA, Gullane PJ. Prevalence of incidental abnormalities on computed tomographic scans of the paranasal sinuses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114: 856–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordts F, Clement PA, Buisseret T. Prevalence of sinusitis signs in a non-ENT population. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1996; 58: 315–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill E, O’Hara J, Carrie S. The significance of MRI findings for non-rhinological disease. Clin Otolaryngol 2006; 31: 292–96; discussion 296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DH, Jun BC, Park JO, Yeo SW. Magnetic resonance imaging of the mastoid cavity and middle ear: prevalence and clinical significance of incidental abnormal findings in a nonotolaryngologic adult and pediatric population. J Otolaryngol 2006; 35: 13–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phan N, Marras C, Midha R, Rowed D. Cervical myelopathy caused by hypoplasia of the atlas: two case reports and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 629–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorne HL, Lander PH. CT recognition of anomalies of the posterior arch of the atlas vertebra: differentiation from fracture. Am J Neuroradiol 1986; 7: 176–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick RY. Cleft arch of atlas simulating fracture of the odontoid process. Spine 1981; 6: 419–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geipel P. Zur Kenntnis der Spaltbildungen das Atlas und Epistropheus. Teil IV. Zentralbl Allg Pathol 1955; 94: 19–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trijolet JP, Parmentier J, Sury F, Goga D, Mejean N, Laure B. Cemento-ossifying fibroma of the mandible. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2011; 128: 30–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macanovic M, Gangidi S, Porter G, Brown S, Courtney D, Porter J. Incidental bony pathology when reporting trauma orthopantomograms. Clin Radiol 2010; 65: 842–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altug HA, Alomeroglu M, Sahin S, Sencimen M, Dogan N, Krishnan DG. Incidental discovery of asymptomatic radiolucent lesion of the posterior mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 845–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon C, Saini T, Norton N, P EC. Systematic protocol for cone beam computed tomography interpretation. J Dent Res 2007; (86): 466.
   Google Scholar
• Bondemark L, Jeppsson M, Lindh-Ingildsen L, Rangne K. Incidental findings of pathology and abnormality in pretreatment orthodontic panoramic radiographs. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 98–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV. Screening panoramic radiology of adults in general dental practice: radiological findings. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Kader HM. Medicolegal perspective: interpretation of pretreatment orthodontic radiographs. World J Orthod 2008; 9: 14–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guidance Notes for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Equipment. HPA-CRCE-010. Chilton: HPA, 2010.
   Google Scholar