References
- Kirk RE, Othmer DF, Kroschwitz J, Howe-Grant M. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edn. New York: Wiley, 1991, 397.
- Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382–90.
- Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to universal and microfilled composites. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 51–59.
- Botta AC, Duarte SJr, Paulin Filho PI, Gheno SM, Powers JM. Surface roughness of enamel and four resin composites. Am J Dent 2009; 22: 252–54.
- de Moraes RR, Gonçalves Lde S, Lancellotti AC, Consani S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Nanohybrid resin composites: nanofiller loaded materials or traditional mycrohybrid resins? Oper Dent 2009; 34: 551–57.
- Imthiaz N, Georgiou G, Moles DR, Jones SP. Comparison of hydroxyapatite and dental enamel for testing shear bond strengths. Aust Orthod J 2008; 24: 15–20.
- Jones SP, Cheuk GC, Georgiou G, Moles DR. Comparison of flouridated apatites with pure hydroxyapatite as potential biomimetic alternatives to enamel for laboratory-based bond strength studies. Aust Orthod J 2009; 25: 12–18.
- Klocke A, Tadic D, Kahl-Nieke B, Epple M. An optimized synthetic substrate for orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 773–78.
- Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994; 21: 33–43.
- Bishara SE, Soliman M, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Effect of changing a test parameter on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 832–35.
- Gwinnett AJ. Bonding of restorative resins to enamel. Int Dent J 1988; 38: 91–96.
- Lee JM, Georgiou G, Jones SP. Initial and fatigue bond strengths of chromatic and light-cured adhesives. Aust Orthod J 2010; 26: 119–26.
- Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 139–44.
- Tavas MA, Watts DC. Bonding of orthodontic brackets by transillumination of a light activated composite: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1979; 6: 207–08.
- Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 669–78.
- Mackay F. The effect of adhesive type and thickness on bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Br J Orthod 1992; 19: 35–39.
- Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 391–96.
- Soderquist SA, Drummond JL, Evans CA. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2006; 129: 175.e7–.e12.
- Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 171–78.
- Montasser MA. Effect of applying a sustained force during bonding orthodontic brackets on the adhesive layer and on shear bond strength. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 402–06.
- Retief DH. The mechanical bond. Int Dent J 1978; 28: 18–27.
- Daskalogiannakis J. Glossary of Orthodontic Terms. Chicago, IL: Quintessence Publishing Company, Inc., 2000, 112.
- Kruzic JJ, Nalla RK, Kinney JH, Ritchie RO. Crack blunting, crack bridging and resistance-curve fracture mechanics in dentin: effect of hydration. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 5209–21.
- Loughran GM, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Evaluation of sub-critical fatigue crack propagation in a restorative composite. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 252–61.
- Pickett KL, Sadowsky PL, Jacobson A, Lacefield W. Orthodontic in vivo bond strength: comparison with in vitro results. Angle Orthod 2001; 71: 141–48.
- Hajrassie MK, Khier SE. In-vivo and in-vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007; 131: 384–90.