References
- Naini FB. Facial proportions: classical canons to modern craniofacial anthropometry. In: Naini FB (ed.). Facial aesthetics: concepts and clinical diagnosis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, 18–44.
- Naini FB, Donaldson AN, McDonald F, Cobourne MT. Assessing the influence of mandibular and chin point asymmetry on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, layperson and clinician. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: 192–206.
- Naini FB, Donaldson AN, McDonald F, Cobourne MT. Assessing the influence of chin height on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, layperson and clinician. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 88–95.
- de Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 67–73.
- Michiels G, Sather AH. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1994; 9: 95–103.
- Erbay EF, Caniklioğlu CM. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 121: 65–72.
- Johnston DJ, Hunt O, Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson M, Hepper P. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 349–54.
- Knight H, Keith O. Ranking facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 340–48.
- Maple JR, Vig KW, Beck FM, Larsen PE, Shanker S. A comparison of providers’ and consumers’ perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 690–96.
- Naini FB, Cobourne MT, McDonald F, Donaldson AN. The influence of craniofacial to standing height proportion on perceived attractiveness. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 37: 877–85.
- Varlik SK, Demirbaş E, Orhan M. Influence of lower facial height changes on frontal facial attractiveness and perception of treatment need by lay people. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 1159–64.
- Abu Arqoub SH, Al-Khateeb SN. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 103–11.
- Barrer JG, Ghafari J. Silhouette profiles in the assessment of facial esthetics: a comparison of cases treated with various orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 385–91.
- Ioi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts A. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 326–32.
- Naini FB. Facial proportions. In: Naini FB (ed.). Facial aesthetics: concepts and clinical diagnosis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, 150–164.
- Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Hreczko TA, Deutsch C, Munro IR. Anthropometric proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young White adults. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 52–60.
- Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Whites: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 75: 328–38.
- Farkas LG, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Geography of the nose: a morphometric study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1986; 10: 191–223.
- Farkas LG, Kolar JC. Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women’s faces. Clin Plast Surg 1987; 14: 599–616.
- Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the attractive North American Caucasian face. In: Farkas LG (ed.). Anthropometry of the head and face, 2nd Edn. New York: Raven Press, 1994, 159–179.
- Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull 2000; 126: 390–423.
- Naini FB. Psychological ramifications of facial deformities. In: Naini FB (ed.). Facial aesthetics: concepts and clinical diagnosis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, 54–61.
- Bhatia SN, Leighton BC. A Manual of Facial Growth: A Computer Analysis of Longitudinal Cephalometric Growth Data. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.