Actual versus theoretical torsional play in conventional and self-ligating bracket systems

References

• Al Fakir H, Carey JP, Melenka GW, Nobes DS, Heo G, Major PW. Investigation into the effects of stainless steel ligature ties on the mechanical characteristics of conventional and self-ligated brackets subjected to torque. J Orthod 2014; 41: 188–200.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance, origin, controversy, commentary. J Clin Orthod 1976a; 10: 99–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance. Explained and compared. J Clin Orthod 1976b; 10: 174–195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews LF. Straight Wire: the Concept and Appliance. 1st edn. San Diego, CA: LA Wells. 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Balut N, Klapper L, Sandrik J, Bowman D. Variations in bracket placement in the preadjusted orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 102: 62–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauchli LM, Senn C, Wichelhaus A. Active and passive self-ligation — a myth? Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 312–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauchli LM, Steineck M, Wichelhaus A. Active and passive self-ligation: a myth? Part 1: torque control. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 663–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstone CJ, Koenig HA. Creative wire bending — the force system from step and V bends. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 93: 59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstone CR. Deep overbite correction by intrusion. Am J Orthod 1977; 72: 1–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burstone CJ, Qin B, Morton JY. Chinese NiTi wire — a new orthodontic alloy. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 445–452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cash AC, Good SA, Curtis RV, McDonald F. An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets-are standards as expected? Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 450–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellinger EL. A scientific assessment of the straight-wire appliance. Am J Orthod 1978; 73: 290–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer-Brandies H, Orthuber W, Es-Souni M, Meyer S. Torque transmission between square wire and bracket as a function of measurement, form and hardness parameters. J Orofac Orthop 2000; 61: 258–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghaleb N, Bouserhal J, Bassil-Nassif N. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 228–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianelly AA, Bednar JR, Dietz VS. A bidimensional edgewise technique. J Clin Orthod 1985; 19: 418–421.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussels W, Nanda RS. Effect of maxillary incisor angulation and inclination on arch length. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 91: 233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major TW, Carey JP, Nobes DS, Heo G, Major PW. Deformation and warping of the bracket slot in select self-ligating orthodontic brackets due to an applied third order torque. J Orthod 2012; 39: 25–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Major TW, Carey JP, Nobes DS, Heo G, Melenka GW, Major PW. An investigation into the mechanical characteristics of select self-ligated brackets at a series of clinically relevant maximum torquing angles: loading and unloading curves and bracket deformation. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 719–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC, Trevisi HJ. Systemized Orthodontic Treatment Mechanics. Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby. 2001
   Google Scholar
• Meling TR, Odegaard J, Seqner D. On bracket slot height: a methodologic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 113: 387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melsen HM, Frederiksen MMA, Godtfredsen EAKL, Melsen B. Force System Identification. Eur J Orthod 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Menghi C, Planert J, Melsen B. 3-D experimental identification of force systems from orthodontic loops activated for first order corrections. Angle Orthod 1999; 69: 49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miethke RR, Melsen B. Effect of variation in tooth morphology and bracket position on first and third order correction with preadjusted appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 329–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal N, Xia Z, Chen J, Stewart KT, Liu SS. Three-dimensional quantification of pretorqued nickel–titanium wires in edgewise and prescription brackets. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 484–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morina E, Eliades T, Pandis N, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Torque expression of self-ligating brackets compared with conventional metallic, ceramic, and plastic brackets. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 233–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planche P. L’evaluation des techniques prè-enfermées depuis Andrews. Rev Orthop Denta Faciale 1997; 31: 453–471.
   Google Scholar
• Rinchuse DJ, Miles PG. Self-ligating brackets: present and future. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 216–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebanc J, Brantley WA, Pincsak JJ, Conover JP. Variability of effective root torque as a function of edge bevel on orthodontic arch wires. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 43–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siatkowski RE. Loss of anterior torque control due to variations in bracket slot and archwire dimensions. J Clin Orthod 1999; 33: 508–510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. Torque expression of 0.018 and 0.022 inch conventional brackets. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35: 610–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sifakakis I, Pandis N, Makou M, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Bourauel C. Torque efficiency of different archwires in 0.018- and 0.022-inch conventional brackets. Angle Orthod 2014; 84: 149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streva AM, Cotrim-Ferreira FA, Garib DG, Carvalho PE. Are torque values of preadjusted brackets precise? J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19: 313–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loenen M, Degrieck J, de Pauw G, Dermaut L. Anterior tooth morphology and its effect on torque. Eur J Orthod 2005; 27: 258–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar