References
- Begum T. A guideline on developing effective multiple choice questions and construction of single best answer format. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2012; 30: 159–166.
- Bullock D, LaBella V, Clingan T, Ding Z, Stewart G and Thibado P. Enhancing the student-instructor interaction frequency. Phys Teach 2002; 40: 535–541. doi: 10.1119/1.1534821
- Caldwell JE. Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE Life Sci Educ 2007; 6: 9–20. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205
- Dhaliwal HK, Allen M, Kang J, Bates C and Hodge T. The effect of using an audience response system on learning, motivation and information retention in the orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over trial. J Orthod 2015; 42: 123–136. doi: 10.1179/1465313314Y.0000000129
- Draper SW and Brown MI. Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. J Comput Assist Learn 2004; 20: 81–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x
- El-Rady J. To click or not to click: that's the question. Innovate 2006; 2: 1–5.
- Elashvili A and Denehy G. Evaluation of an audience response system in a preclinical operative dentistry course. J Dent Educ 2008; 72: 1296–1303.
- General Dental Council. Preparing for Practice – Dental Team Learning Outcomes for Registration, 2012;. http://www.gdc-uk.org/Newsandpublications/Publications/Publications/GDC Learning Outcomes.pdf.
- Honey J, Lynch CD, Burke F and Gilmour ASM. Ready for practice? A study of confidence levels of final year dental students at cardiff university and university college cork. Eur J Dent Educ 2011; 15: 98–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2010.00646.x
- Kay RH and LeSage A. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: a review of the literature. Comput Educ 2009; 53: 819–827. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.001
- Kay RH. Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems. Comput Educ 2009; 52: 730–740. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.015
- Murphy RJ, Gray SA, Straja SR and Bogert MC. Student learning preferences and teaching implications. J Dent Educ 2004; 68: 859–866.
- Pelton LF and Pelton T. Selected and constructed response systems in mathematics classrooms. In Banks D (ed.). Audience Response Systems in Higher Education: Applications and Cases, Information Science Publishing, London, UK, 2006. pp. 175–186.
- Pileggi R and O'Neill PN. Team-based learning using an audience response system: an innovative method of teaching diagnosis to undergraduate dental students. J Dent Educ 2005; 72: 1182–1188.
- Satheesh K. Student evaluation of clickers in a combined dental and dental hygiene periodontology course. J Dent Educ 2013; 77: 1321–1329.
- Siau K, Sheng H and Nah FH. Use of a classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE Trans Educ 2006; 49: 398–403. doi: 10.1109/TE.2006.879802
- Stoddard HA and Piquette CA. A controlled study of improvements in student exam performance with the use of an audience response system during medical school lectures. Acad Med 2010; 85: S37–S40. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed3b40
- Wellek S and Blettner M. On the proper use of the crossover design in clinical trials: part 18 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109: 276.
- Wenz HJ, Zupanic M, Klosa K, Schneider B and Karsten G. Using an audience response system to improve learning success in practical skills training courses in dental studies - a randomised, controlled cross-over study. Eur J Dent Educ 2014; 18: 147–153. doi: 10.1111/eje.12071