Pitch and lexical tone perception of bilingual English–Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant recipients, hearing aid users, and normally hearing listeners

References

• ANSI 1994. American National Standard Acoustical Terminology. New York: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Arehart, K.H. 1994. Effects of harmonic content on complex-tone fundamental-frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95: 3574–3585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, D.K. 2003. Effects of stimulation rates on Cantonese lexical tone perception by cochlear implant users in Hong Kong. Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences, 28: 533–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan, W.R., Rubinstein, J.T. 2008. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45: 779–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• François, C., Chobert, J., Besson, M., Schön, D. 2013. Music training for the development of speech segmentation. Cerebral Cortex, 23(9): 2038–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q.J., Zeng, F.G. 2000. Identification of temporal envelope cues in Chinese tone recognition. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 5: 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Q.J., Zeng, F.G., Shannon, R.V., Soli, S.D. 1998. Importance of tonal envelope cues in Chinese speech recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104: 505–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q.J., Hsu, C.J., Horng, M.J. 2004. Effects of speech processing strategy on Chinese tone recognition by Nucleus-24 cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 25: 501–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, J.J., Fu, Q., Nogaki, G. 2007. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear and Hearing, 28: 302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, J.J., Fu, Q., Oba, S. 2008. Effect of instrument timbre on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124: EL189–EL195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Olszewski, C., Turner, C., Gantz, B., Oleson, J. 2006. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 11(Suppl 1): 12–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Turner, C., Oleson, J., Zhang, X., Gantz, B., Froman, R., et al. 2007. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear and Hearing, 28: 412–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Oleson, J., Knutson, J., Breheny, P., Driscoll, V. and Olszewski, C. 2008. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 19: 120–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, D., Liu, B., Zhou, N., Chen, X., Kong, Y., Liu, H., et al. 2009. Lexical tone perception with HiResolution and HiResolution 120 sound-processing strategies in pediatric Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 30: 169–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtsma, A.J.M. 1997. Pitch and timbre: definition, meaning and use. Journal of New Music Research, 26: 104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, L.M. 1993. The phonology of tone: the representation of tonal register. In: Van Der Hulst, H. and Snider, K. eds. Register tone and tonal geometry. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Koelsch, S., Siebel, W.A. 2005. Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9: 578–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y., Stickney, G., Zeng, F.G. 2005. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117: 1351–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, N., McGee, T., Carrell, T., Sharma, C. 1995. Neurophysiologic bases of speech discrimination. Ear and Hearing, 16: 19–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, W., Dillier, N. 2002. MACarena: a flexible computer-based speech testing environment. 7th international cochlear implant conference, 4–6 September 2002, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L. 2010. The tonal system of Singapore Mandarin. Proceedings of the 22nd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics and the 18th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics. 20–22 May 2010, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Limb, C. J., Molloy, A. T., Jiradejvong, P., Braun, A. R. 2010. Auditory cortical activity during cochlear implant-mediated perception of spoken language, melody, and rhythm. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 11: 133–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limb, C.J., Roy, A.T. 2014. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 308: 13–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, V. 2008. The effect of cochlear implantation of music: a review. Otorinolaringologia, 58: 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Looi, V., McDermott, H., McKay, C., Hickson, L. 2008a. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing. International Journal of Audiology, 47: 257–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, V., McDermott, H., McKay, C., Hickson, L. 2008b. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear and Hearing, 29: 421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, V., Gfeller, K., Driscoll, V. 2012a. Music appreciation and training for cochlear implant recipients: a review. Seminars in Hearing, 33: 307–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Looi, V., King, J., Kelly-Campbell, R. 2012b. A music appreciation training program developed for clinical application with cochlear implant recipients and hearing aid users. Seminars in Hearing, 33: 361–380.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, X., Fu, Q.J., Galvin, J.J. 2007. Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users. Trends in Amplification, 11: 301–315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDermott, H. 2012. Music perception. In: Zeng, F.G., Popper, A., Fay, R.R. (eds.) Auditory prostheses: new horizons. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. 2007. Cochlear hearing loss: physiological, psychological and technical issues. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C., Carlyon, R.P. 2005. Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. Pitch. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, L., Simons, G., Fenning, C. 2014. Ethnologue: languages of the world, 17th ed. [ Online]. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Available: http://www.ethnologue.com/17/. [Accessed 14 March 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S.C., Tomblin, J.B., Cheung, H., Lin, Y.S., Wang, L.S. 2004. Perception and production of Mandarin tones in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 25: 251–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, C. 2000. Perception and expression of emotion in speech. Unpublished PhD thesis, Macquarie University, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, K. 2006. Emotion perception in speech: discrimination, identification and the effects of talker and sentence variability. Unpublished Doctor of Audiology Capstone Project, Washington University School of Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Sucher, C.M., McDermott, H.J. 2007. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 230: 80–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, D., Deng, R., Jiang, Y., Galvin, J.J., Fu, Q.J., Chen, B. 2014. Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 36: 102–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torppa, R., Faulkner, A., Huotilainen, M., Järvikivi, J., Lipsanen, J., Laasonen, M., et al. 2014. The perception of prosody and associated auditory cues in early-implanted children: the role of auditory working memory and musical activities. International Journal of Audiology, 53(3): 182–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., Carrell, T.D., McGee, T. 1997. Central auditory system plasticity: generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102: 3762–3773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R. 1993. The Standard Chinese Database. Unpublished internal material, University of Science and Technology of China.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Zhou, N., Xu, L. 2011. Musical pitch and lexical tone perception with cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology, 50: 270–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, W.I., Wong, R., Hui, Y., Au, D.K., Wong, B.Y., Ho, W., et al. 2000. Chinese tonal language rehabilitation following cochlear implantation in children. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 120: 218–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, C.G., Cao, K., Zeng, F.G. 2004. Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects. Hearing Research, 197: 87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L.L., Liu, S., Han, N. 2008. The Mainland Mandarin hearing in noise test. International Journal of Audiology, 47: 393–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf, N.K., Ryan, A.F., Bone, R.C. 1981. Neural phase-locking properties in the absence of cochlear outer hair cells. Hearing Research, 4: 335–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J.L., Yang, H.M. 2003. Speech perception of Mandarin Chinese speaking young children after cochlear implant use: effect of age at implantation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 67: 247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, M. 1989. Contour tones. Phonology, 6: 149–174.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, N., Huang, J., Chen, X., Xu, L. 2013. Relationship between tone perception and production in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Otology & Neurotology, 34: 499–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar