Participatory design of a music aural rehabilitation programme

References

• Boothroyd, A. 2007. Adult aural rehabilitation: what is it and does it work? Trends in Amplification, 11: 63–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clemensen, J., Larsen, S.B., Kyng, M., Kirkevold, M. 2007. Participatory design in health sciences: using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology. Qualitative Health Research, 17: 122–130. doi:10.1177/1049732306293664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. 1995. About face: the essentials of user interface design. Foster City, CA: IDG Books Worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, D., Cooper, R.A., Pearlman, J. 2007. Incorporating participatory design action into research and education. In: Proceedings: International Conference On Engineering Education 2007, Coimbra, Portugal, viewed 13 February 2015, http://ineer.org/Events/ICEE2007/papers/553.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, V.D. 2012. The effects of training on recognition of musical instruments by adults with cochlear implants. Seminars in Hearing, 33: 410–418. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1329230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu, Q-.J., Galvin, J.J. III 2007. Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients. Trends in Amplification, 11: 193–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujita, S., Ito, J. 1999. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 108: 634–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, J.J. III, Fu, Q-.J., Nogaki, G. 2007. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear & Hearing, 28: 302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin III, J.J., Fu, Q-.J., Oba, S.I. 2009. Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125: EL 98–103. doi:10.1121/1.3062148.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Knutson, J.F., Woodworth, G., Witt, S., DeBus, B. 1998. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 9: 1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Mehr, M., Witt, S. 2001. Aural rehabilitation of music perception and enjoyment of adult cochlear implant users. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 34: 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Adamek, M., Mehr, M., Rogers, J., Stordahl, J., 2002a. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 13: 132–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Witt, S.A., Kim, K.-H., Adamek, M., Coffman, D. 1999. Preliminary report of a computerized music training program for adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 32: 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Stordahl, J., Mehr, M., Woodworth, G. 2000. The effects of training on melody recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 33: 115–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Woodworth, G., Mehr, M., Knutson, J. 2002b. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 111: 349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Woodworth, G., Robin, D.A., Witt, S., Knutson, J.F. 1997. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear & Hearing, 18: 252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng, J., Cantarero, G., Elhilali, M., Limb, C.J. 2011. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 280: 192–200. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., Nixon, R. 2014. The action research planner: doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, Y-.Y., Cruz, R., Jones, J.A., Zeng, F-.G. 2004. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear & Hearing, 25: 173–185. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000120365.97792.2F.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y-.Y., Mullangi, A., Marozeau, J., Epstein, M. 2011. Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54: 981–994. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0196).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, V., McDermott, H., McKay, C., Hickson, L. 2004. Pitch discrimination and melody recognition by cochlear implant users. International Congress Series, 1273: 197–200. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2004.08.038.
   Google Scholar
• Looi, V., She, J. 2010. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. International Journal of Audiology, 49: 116–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, B.R., van Besouw, R.M., Nicholls, D.R. 2012. The ‘Interactive Music Awareness Program’ (IMAP) for cochlear implant users. In: Proceedings: International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, viewed 13 February 2015, http://www.nime.org/proceedings/2012/nime2012_109.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, B., Mortensen, M.V., Hansen, M., Vuust, P. 2012. Singing in the key of life: a study on effects of musical ear training after cochlear implantation. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 22: 134–151. doi:10.1037/a0031140.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, G. 2006. Adult rehabilitation. In: H.R. Cooper, and L.C. Craddock (eds.), Cochlear implants: a practical guide. 2nd ed. London: Whurr Publishers, 299–321.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, R. 2010. HOPE Notes DVD. Cochlear (re)habilitation resources. Centennial: Cochlear Americas.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, V., Simpson, R.C., LoPresti, E.F., Mostowy, C., Olson, J., Puhlman, J., et al. 2008. Participatory design in the development of the wheelchair convoy system. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 5: 1. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-5-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sucher, C.M., McDermott, H.J. 2007. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 230: 80–87. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetow, R., Palmer, C.V. 2005. Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 16: 494–504.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweetow, R.W., Sabes, J.H. 2007. Technologic advances in aural rehabilitation: applications and innovative methods of service delivery. Trends in Amplification, 11: 101–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Besouw, R.M., Nicholls, D.R., Oliver, B.R., Hodkinson, S.M., Grasmeder, M.L. 2014. Aural rehabilitation through music workshops for cochlear implant users. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 25: 311–323. doi:10.3766/jaaa.25.4.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Besouw, R.M., Oliver, B.R., Grasmeder, M.L., Hodkinson, S.M., Solheim, H. in press. Evaluation of an interactive music awareness program for cochlear implant recipients. Music Perception.
   Google Scholar
• van Besouw, R.M., Oliver, B.R., Grasmeder, M.L., Nicholls, D.R., Hodkinson, S.M., Polfreman, R., et al. 2013. The Interactive Music Awareness Programme (IMAP). University of Southampton, available online: www.morefrommusic.org.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., Chen, B., Galvin III, J.J., Fu, Q-.J. 2011. Influence of pitch, timbre, and timing cues on melodic contour identification with a competing masker (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130: 3562–3565. doi:10.1121/1.3658474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar