A preliminary report of music-based training for adult cochlear implant users: Rationales and development

References

• American Academy of Audiology, 2010. Music training and cochlear implants, viewed 11 October 2011, http://www.audiology.org/news/Pages/20100421.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Besson, M., Schön, D., Moreno, S., Santos, A., Magne, C. 2007. Influence of musical expertise and musical training on pitch processing in music and language. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25: 399–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, A. 2010. Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21: 601–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C.J., Etler, C., He, S., O'Brien, S., Erenberg, S., Kim, J., et al. 2008. The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 29: 704–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C.J., Gfeller, K., Abbas, P., Jeon, J., Driscoll, V., Mussoi, B., et al. 2014. Musical training: effects on perception and electrophysiologic measures of discrimination. American Auditory society Scientific and Technology Meeting, Scottsdale Arizona, March 8.
   Google Scholar
• Chasin, M., Russo, F.A. 2004. Hearing AIDS and music. Trends in Amplification, 8(2): 35–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chermak, G. 2010. Music and auditory training. The Hearing Journal, 63: 57–58.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, P.J., Limb, C. 2009. Music perception in cochlear implant users. In: Niparko, J.K. (ed.) Cochlear implants: principles and practices, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, p. 223.
   Google Scholar
• Drennan, W.R., Rubinstein, J.T. 2008. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Research Development, 45: 779–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driscoll, V. 2012. The effects of training on recognition of musical instruments by adults with cochlear implants. Seminars in Hearing, 33: 410–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Driscoll, V., Oleson, J., Jiang, D., Gfeller, K. 2009. Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 20: 71–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, L.M., Tremblay, K.L. 2006. Acoustic change complexes recorded in adult cochlear implant listeners. Ear and Hearing, 27: 678–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q., Galvin, J.J. 2007. Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients. Trends in Amplification, 11: 193–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu, Q., Galvin, J.J., Wang, X., Wu, J. 2015. Benefits of music training in Mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58: 163–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, J.J., Eskridge, E., Oba, S., Fu, Q.J. 2012. Melodic contour identification training in cochlear implant users with and without a competing instrument. Seminars in Hearing, 33: 399–409.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, J.J., Fu, Q., Nogaki, G. 2007. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear and Hearing, 28: 302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, J.J., Fu, Q., Shannon, R.V. 2009. Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1169: 518–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K. 2001. Aural rehabilitation of music listening for adult cochlear implant recipients: addressing learner characteristics. Music Therapy Perspectives, 19: 88–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K.E. 2008. Music: a human phenomenon and therapeutic tool. In: Davis, W.B., Gfeller, K.E., Thaut, M.H. (eds.), An introduction to music therapy theory and practice, 3rd ed. Silver Spring, MD: American Music Therapy Association, p. 41.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K.E., Christ, A., Knutson, J.F., Witt, S.A., Murray, K.T., Tyler, R.S. 2000a. The musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11: 390–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Jiang, D., Oleson, J., Driscoll, V., Knutson, J. 2010. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21: 28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Jiang, D., Oleson, J.J., Driscoll, V., Olszewski, C., Knutson, J.F., et al. 2012. The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Journal of Music Therapy, 49: 68–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Mehr, M., Witt, S. 2001. Aural rehabilitation of music perception and enjoyment of adult cochlear implant users. Journal of the Academy for Rehabilitative Audiology, 34: 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Oleson, J., Knutson, J., Breheny, P., Driscoll, V., Olszewski, C. 2008. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 19: 120–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K.E., Turner, C.W., Zhang, X., Gantz, B.J., Froman, R.J., Olszewski, C.A. 2007. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition and speech reception in noise. Ear and Hearing, 28(3): 412–423. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180479318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Adamek, M., Mehr, M., Rogers, J., Stordahl, J., et al. 2002a. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 31: 132–145.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Stordahl, J., Mehr, M., Woodworth, G. 2000b. The effects of training on melody recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 33: 115–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Woodworth, G., Mehr, M., Knutson, J.F. 2002b. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 111: 349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, B.A., Turner, C.W. 2003. The resolution of complex spectral patterns in cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113: 2861–2873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herholz, S.C., Zatorre, R.J. 2012. Musical training as a framework for brain plasticity: behavior, function, and structure. Neuron, 76: 486–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingvalson, E.M., Wong, P.C.M. 2013. Training to improve language outcomes in cochlear implant recipients. Frontiers in Psychology, 4: 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirby, B.J., Brown, C.J. 2015. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on AAC amplitude and listener performance. Ear and Hearing, doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, N., Skoe, E. 2009. New directions: cochlear implants. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences, 1169: 516–517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraus, N., Skoe, E., Parbery-Clark, A., Ashley, R. 2009. Experience-induced malleability in neural encoding of pitch, timbre, and timing-implications for language and music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169: 543–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limb, C.J., Roy, A.T. 2014. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 308: 13–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loebach, J.L., Pisoni, D.B. 2008. Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123: 1126–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loebach, J.L., Pisoni, D.B., Svirsky, M.A. 2009. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and non-speech tasks: implications for cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 30: 662–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, V., Gfeller, K., Driscoll, V. 2012a. Music appreciation and training for cochlear implant recipients: a review. Seminars in Hearing, 33: 307–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Looi, V., King, J., Kelly-Campbell, R. 2012b. A music appreciation training program developed for clinical application with cochlear implant recipients and hearing aid users. Seminars in Hearing, 33: 361–380.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B.A., Boothroyd, A. 2000. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107: 2155–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D.R., Amitay, S. 2007. Auditory training: rules and applications. Seminars in Hearing, 28: 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Musacchia, G., Sams, M., Skoe, E., Kraus, N. 2007. Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 104: 15894–15898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, A.D. 2007. Music, language, and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, A. 2011. Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 2: 142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, B., Weed, E., Sandmann, P., Brattico, E., Hansen, M., Sorensen, S., et al. 2015. Brain response to musical feature changes in adolescent cochlear implant users. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9: 1–14. doi:10:3389/fnhum.2015.00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, R.L., Driscoll, V.D., Gfeller, K., Kliethermes, S., Oleson, J. 2013. Speech intonation and melodic contour recognition in children with cochlear implants and with normal hearing. Otology & Neurotology, 34: 490–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahin, A. 2011. Neurophysiological influence of musical training on speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology, 2: 126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J.H., Skoe, E., Wong, P.C., Kraus, N. 2008. Plasticity in the adult human auditory brainstem following short-term linguistic training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20: 1892–1902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spahr, A.J., Dorman, M.F. 2004. Performance of subjects fit with the advanced bionics CII and nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. Archives of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, 130: 624–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strait, D.L., Kraus, N., Skoe, E., Ashley, R. 2009. Musical experience promotes subcortical efficiency in processing emotional vocal sounds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169: 209–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, B., Dawson, P., McDermott, H. 2009. Investigating cochlear implant place-pitch perception with the modified melodies test. Cochlear Implants International, 10(Suppl. 1): 100–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tremblay, K.L., Kraus, N. 2002. Auditory training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research, 45: 564–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali, A., Sly, D., Cowan, R., van Hoesel, R. 2015. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues. Ear and Hearing, 36: e1–e13. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P.C.M., Skoe, E., Russo, N.M., Dees, T., Kraus, N. 2007. Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 10: 420–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar