Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 16, 2015 - Issue sup3: Music Perception and Cochlear Implants
368
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users

, , , &

References

  • Adunka, O., Kiefer, J. 2006. Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 135(3): 374–382.
  • Boëx, C., Baud, L., Cosendai, G., Sigrist, A., Kós, M. I., Pelizzone, M. 2006. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 7(2): 110–124.
  • Boyd, P. J. 2011. Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes. Ear and Hearing, 32(4): 411–427.
  • Donaldson, G. S., Kreft, H. A., Litvak, L. 2005. Place–pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(2): 623–626.
  • Eisen, M. D. and Franck, K. H. 2005. Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 6(2): 160–170.
  • Finley, C. C., Holden, T. A., Holden, L. K., Whiting, B. R., Chole, R. A., Neely, G. J., et al. 2008. Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otology & Neurotology, 29(7): 920–928.
  • Firszt, J. B., Koch, D. B., Downing, M., Litvak, L. 2007. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients. Otology & Neurotology, 28(5): 629–636.
  • Gifford, R. H., Dorman, M. F., Skarzynski, H., Lorens, A., Polak, M., Driscoll, C. L., et al. 2013. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear and Hearing, 34(4): 413–425.
  • Glueckert, R., Pfaller, K., Kinnefors, A., Rask-Andersen, H., Schrott-Fischer, A. 2005. The human spiral ganglion: new insights into ultrastructure, survival rate and implications for cochlear implants. Audiology and Neurotology, 10(5): 258–273.
  • International Telecommunication Union. 2003. Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate sound quality (MUSHRA; ITU-R. Recommendation.BS.1534-1). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
  • Koch, D. B., Downing, M., Osberger, M. J., Litvak, L. 2007. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear and Hearing, 28(2 Suppl.): 38S–41S.
  • Limb, C. J. and Roy, A. T. 2014. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, 308: 13–26.
  • Miranda, P. C., Sampaio, A. L., Lopes, R. A., Ramos Venosa, A., de Oliveira, C. A. 2014. Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery. International Journal of Otolaryngology, 2014: 468515.
  • Nogueira, W., Litvak, L. M., Saoji, A. A., Büchner, A. 2015. Design and evaluation of a cochlear implant strategy based on a ‘phantom’ channel. PLoS ONE, 10(3): e0120148.
  • Roy, A. T., Jiradejvong, P., Carver, C., Limb, C. J. 2012a. Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception. Trends in Amplification, 16(4): 191–200.
  • Roy, A. T., Jiradejvong, P., Carver, C., Limb, C. J. 2012b. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening. Otology & Neurotology, 33(3): 319–327.
  • Roy, A. T., Carver, C., Jiradejvong, P., Limb, C. J. 2015 [Epub ahead of print]. Musical sound quality in cochlear implant (CI) users: a comparison in bass frequency perception between fine structure processing (FSP) and HDCIS strategies. Ear and Hearing.
  • Saoji, A. A., Litvak, L. M. 2010. Use of ‘phantom electrode’ technique to extend the range of pitches available through a cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 31(5): 693–701.
  • Soda-Merhy, A., Gonzalez-Valenzuela, L., Tirado-Gutierrez, C. 2008. Residual hearing preservation after cochlear implantation: comparison between straight and perimodiolar implants. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 139(3): 399–404.
  • Stickney, G. S., Loizou, P. C., Mishra, L. N., Assmann, P. F., Shannon, R. V., Opie, J. M. 2006. Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions. Hearing Research, 211(1–2): 33–45.
  • Townshend, B., Cotter, N., Van Compernolle, D., White, R. L. 1987. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82 (1): 106–115.
  • Vincent, E. 2005. MUSHRAM: A MATLAB interface for MUSHRA listening tests. Retrieved from http://c4dm.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/downloads/#mushram
  • Wilson, B. S., Lawson, D. T., Zerbi, M., Finley, C. C. 1994. Recent developments with the CIS strategies. In: I. Hochmair-Desoyer and E. S. Hochmair (eds) Advances in Cochlear Implants – Proc. of the Third Int. Cochlear Implant Conf., pp. 103–112. Vienna, Austria: Datenkonvertierung, Reproduction and Druck.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.