Cochlear-implanted children from homes where English is an additional language: findings from a recent audit in one London centre

References

• Archbold S, Lutman ME, Marshall DH 1995. Categories of auditory performance. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology, 166(Suppl): 312–314.
   Google Scholar
• BATOD British Association of Teachers of the Deaf. 2003. [2009 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.batod.org.uk/index.php?id=/publications/survey/Englandsurvey-2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Belzner KA, Seal BC 2009. Children with cochlear implants: a review of demographics and communication outcomes. American Annals of the Deaf, 154(3): 311–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrettini S, Forli F, Genovese E, Santarelli R, Arslan E, Chilosi A, Cipriani P 2008. Cochlear implantation in deaf children with associated disabilities: challenges and outcomes. International Journal of Audiology, 47: 199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman RS 2000. Children's language learning: an interactionist perspective. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(1): 33–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RM, McDaniel DM 1989. Development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32: 347–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DCSF Department of Children Schools and Families. 2008. Local Authority Tables See Table 10. [updated 2010 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000786/LATablesWeb.xls
   Google Scholar
• Farran LK, Lederberg AR, Jackson LA 2009. Maternal input and lexical development: the case for deaf preschoolers. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44(2): 145–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenson L, Virginia A, Marchman , Donna J, Thal DJ, Philip S, Dale PS, Reznick JS, Bates E 2007. The MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: user's guide and technical manual (2nd Edition). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Filipo R, Bosco E, Mancini P, Ballantyne D 2004. Cochlear implants in special cases: deafness in the presence of disabilities and/or associated problems. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 552(Suppl): 74–80.
   Google Scholar
• Fortnum HM, Marshall DH, Summerfield AQ 2002. Epidemiology of the UK population of hearing-impaired children, including characteristics of those with and without cochlear implants: audiology, aetiology, co-morbidity and affluence. International Journal of Audiology, 41: 170–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis AL, Ho DWL 2003. Case report: acquisition of three spoken languages by a child with a cochlear implant. Cochlear Implants International, 4: 31–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallaway C, Woll B 1994. Interaction and childhood deafness. In: , Gallaway C, Richards BJ (eds.) Input and Interaction in Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Geers A, Moog J, Biedenstein J, Brenner C, Hayes H 2009. Spoken language scores of children using cochlear implants compared to hearing age-mates at school entry. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(3): 371–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts P, Daemers K, Yperman M, De Beukelaer C, De Saegher G, De Ceulaer G 2006. Auditory speech sounds evaluation (A section signE(R)): a new test to assess detection, discrimination and identification in hearing impairment. Cochlear Implants International, 7(2): 92–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guiberson MM 2005. Children with cochlear implants from bilingual families: consideration for intervention and a case study. Volta Review, 105: 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff E 2006. How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26(1): 55–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RF, Kirk KI 2005. Speech and language development in cognitively delayed children with cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 6(2): 132–148.
   Google Scholar
• Le Normand M, Ouellet C, Cohen H 2003. Productivity of lexical categories in French-speaking children with cochlear implants. Brain and Cognition, 53: 257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon M 2003. Conversations with young deaf children in families where English is an additional language. In , Gallaway C, Young SA (eds.) Deafness and Education in the UK. Research Perspectives. London: Whurr, pp. 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mahon M, Crutchley A, Quinn T 2003. Editorial: New directions in the assessment of bilingual children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19(3): 237–243.
   Google Scholar
• Martin N, Brownell R 2008. TAPS-3 Test of Auditory Processing Skills (3rd Edition). Northumberland: Ann Arbor Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer C, Wells G 1996. Can the linguistic interdependence theory suport a bilingual-bicultural model of literacy education for deaf students?. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1(2): 93–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MED-EL LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire. [2010 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.medel.com/english/50_Rehabilitation/03_For_Children/Paediatric_Assessment_Tools.php.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy K 2009. Accounting for parental language input in bilingual and multilingual families: the development of a “home language environment” questionnaire. Unpublished MRes thesis, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto T, Svirsky M, Robbins A 1997. Enhancement of expressive language in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngology, 117: 154–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mytton J, Mackenzie I 2005. Observed and expected prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in Oldham. Journal of Public Health, 27(3): 298–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeem Z, Newton V 1996. Prevalence of sensori-neural hearing loss in Asian children. British Journal of Audiology, 30(5): 332–339.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NDCS – National Deaf Children's Society Factsheet (2008). [2010 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.ndcs.org.uk/family_support/education_m/choosing_a_school/england.rma NICE–National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2008). [2009 Nov 20]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CochlearImplantsFAD.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolas J, Geers A 2007. Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 50: 1048–1062.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads EA 2008. Working with multicultural and multilingual families of young children. In: , Madell J, Flexer C (eds.) Pediatric Audiology: Birth Through Adolescence. New York: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins AM 2003. Bilingual Family Interview (BIFI). [2010 Jan 13]. Available from: http://www.advancedbionics.com/UserFiles/File/3-01066-B-5_Bilingual%20Family%20Interview%20%28BIFI%29-FNL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins AM 2007. Clinical management of bilingual families and children with cochlear implants. Loud and Clear!, 1: 1–12. [2010 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.bionics.com/userfiles/File/Loud_and_Clear_107.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins AM, Green J, Waltzman SB 2004. Bilingual oral language proficiency in children with cochlear implants. Archives Otology: Head and Neck Surgery, 130: 644–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCSLT Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists Specific Interest Group in Bilingualism. 2007. Good Practice for Speech and Language Therapists Working with Clients from Linguistic Minorities. [2010 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.rcslt.org/docs/Linguistic_Minority_Communities_good__practice_for_SLTs_Oct_2007_Final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Saxton M 2008. What's in a name? Coming to terms with the child's linguistic environment. Journal of Child Language, 35: 677–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schauwers K, Govaerts P, Gillis S (eds) 2002. Language acquisition in very young children with a cochlear implant. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, 102: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma A, Dorman MF, Spahr AJ 2002. A sensitive period for the development of the central auditory system in children with cochlear implants: implications for age of implantation. Ear and Hearing, 23(6): 532–539.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spencer P 2004. Individual differences in language performance after cochlear implantation at one to three years of age: child, family, and linguistic factors. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9: 395–412.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svirsky M, Teoh S, Neuburger H 2004. Development of language and speech perception in cogenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 9: 224–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szagun G 2001. Language acquisition in young German-speaking children with cochlear implants: Individual differences and implications for conceptions of a “sensitive phase”. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 6: 288–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szagun G 2004. Individual differences in language acquisition by young children with cochlear implants and implications for a concept of ‘sensitive phase’. In: , Miyamoto R (ed.) Cochlear Implants. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 308–311.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas E, El-Kashlan H, Zwolan TA 2008. Children with cochlear implants who live in monolingual and bilingual homes. Otology and Neurotology, 29: 230–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoutenhoofd E, Archbold SM, Gregory S, Lutman ME, Nikolopoulos TP, Sach TH (eds.) 2005. Paediatric Cochlear Implantation: Evaluating Outcomes. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello M 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomblin B, Barker B, Spencer L, Zhang X, Gantz B 2005. The effect of age at cochlear implant stimulation on expressive language growth in infants and toddlers. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 48: 853–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers DA, Moore BCJ, Baer T 2001. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(2): 1164–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltzman SB, Robbins AM, Green J, Cohen N 2003. Second oral language capabilities in children with cochlear implants. Otology and Neurotology, 24(5): 757–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherby A, Prizant B 2002. Communication and Symbolic Behavioural Scales Developmental Profile. (CSBS DP). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brooks Publishing Co. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RE 2008. Preschool Language Scale UK, 4th edn (PLS 4). London: Pearson PsychCorp.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman-Phillips S, Robbins AM, Osberger MJ 2000. Assessing cochlear implant benefit in very young children. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngoogy, 109(12) Supplement: 42–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar