664
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Management Accounting Research and Structuration Theory: A Critical Realist Critique

&

References

  • Alawattage, C. and D. Wickramasinghe 2009. ‘Weapons of the weak: subalterns’ emancipatory accounting in Ceylon tea’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability 22(3): 379–404.
  • Archer, M. 1982. ‘Morphogenesis versus structuration: on combining structure and action’. British Journal of Sociology 33(2): 455–83.
  • Archer, M. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Archer, M. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Armstrong, P. 2008. ‘Calling out for more: comment on the future of interpretive accounting research’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19(6): 867–79.
  • Ashraf, M.J. and S. Uddin. 2013. ‘A consulting giant; a disgruntled customer: a “failed” attempt to change management controls in a public sector organisation’. Financial Accountability and Management 29(2): 186–203.
  • Bacharach, B. and B. Mundell. 1993. ‘Organizational politics in schools: micro, macro, and logics of action’. Educational Administration Quarterly 29(4): 423–52.
  • Baxter, J. J. and W. F. Chua 2003. ‘Alternative management accounting research: whence and whither’. Accounting, Organisations and Society 28(2–3): 97–126.
  • Bhaskar, R. [1975] 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.
  • Bhaskar, R. 1979. Possibility of Naturalism. Hassocks: Harvester.
  • Boland, R. J. 1993. ‘Accounting and the interpretative act’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 18(2/3): 125–46.
  • Broadbent, J., K. Jacobs and R. Laughlin 2001. ‘Organisational resistance strategies to unwanted accounting and finance changes: the case of general medical practice in the UK’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 14(5): 565–86.
  • Burns, J. E. and R. W. Scapens 2000. ‘Conceptualising management accounting change: an institutional framework’. Management Accounting Research 11: 3–25.
  • Chenhall, R. H. 2003. ‘Management control system design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28(2/3): 127–68.
  • Coad, A. and L. Glyptis 2014. ‘Structuration: a position–practice perspective and an illustrative study’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25(2): 142–61.
  • Coad, A. and I. Herbert 2009. ‘Back to the future: new potential for structuration theory in management accounting research?’ Management Accounting Research 20(3): 177–92.
  • Cohen, I.J. 1989. Structuration Theory: Anthony Giddens and the Constitution of Social Life. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Conrad, L. 2005. ‘A structuration analysis of accounting systems and systems of accountability in the privatised gas industry’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16(1): 1–26.
  • Covaleski, M. A. and M. W. Dirsmith 1986. ‘The budgetary process of power and politics’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 11(3): 193–214.
  • Covaleski, M. A. and M. W. Dirsmith 1988. ‘The use of budgetary symbols in the political arena: an historically informed field study’. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 13(1): 1–24.
  • Dent, J. F. 1991. ‘Accounting and organisational cultures: a field study of the emergence of a new organisational reality’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16(8): 693–703.
  • Elder-Vass, D. 2010. The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Englund, H. and J. Gerdin 2008. ‘Structuration theory and mediating concepts: pitfalls and implications for management accounting’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19(8): 1122–34.
  • Englund, H. and J. Gerdin 2014. ‘Structuration theory in accounting research: applications and applicability’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25(2): 162–80.
  • Englund, Hans, J. Gerdin and J. Burns 2011. ‘25 years of Giddens in accounting research: achievements, limitations and the future’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 36(8): 494–513.
  • Friedland, R. and R.R. Alford. 1987. ‘Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions.’ In Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity, eds S. Lash and S. Whimster, 232–63. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Giddens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.
  • Giddens, A. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.
  • Giddens, A. 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Giddens, A. 1989. ‘A reply to my critics’. In Social Theories of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and his Critics, eds D. Held and J.B. Thompson, 249–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Granlund, M. 2001. ‘Towards explaining stability in and around management accounting systems’. Management Accounting Research 12(2): 141–66.
  • Gregson, N. 1989. ‘On the (ir)relevance of structuration theory to empirical research’. In Social Theories of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and his Critics, eds D. Held and J. B. Thompson, 235–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hassan, M. K. 2010. ‘Understanding the behavioural aspects of costing systems in public health organisations’. International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance 1(3): 207–23.
  • Jack, L. and A. Kholeif 2007. ‘Introducing strong structuration theory for informing qualitative case studies in organization, management and accounting research’. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 2: 208–25.
  • Jack, L. and A. Kholeif 2008. ‘ERP and a contest to limit the role of management accountants: a strong structuration perspective’. Accounting Forum 32(1): 30–45.
  • Jayasinghe, K. and D. Thomas 2009. ‘The preservation of indigenous accounting systems in a subaltern community’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 22(3): 351–78.
  • Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M.-L., K. Lukka and J. Kuorikoski 2008. ‘Straddling between paradigms: a naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(2/3): 267–91.
  • Kilfoyle, E. and A. J. Richardson 2011. ‘Agency and structure in budgeting: thesis, antithesis and synthesis’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 22(2): 183–99.
  • Lawrenson, D. M. 1992. ‘Britain's railways: the predominance of engineering over accountancy during the inter-war period’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 3(1): 45–60.
  • Macintosh, N. B. and R. W. Scapens 1990. ‘Structuration theory in management accounting’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 15(5): 455–77.
  • Modell, S. 2015. ‘Making institutional accounting research critical: dead end or new beginning?’ Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 28(5): 773–808.
  • Mouritsen, J. 1999. ‘The flexible firm: strategies for a subcontractor's management control’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24(1): 31–55.
  • Outhwaite, W. 1987. New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics, and Critical Theory. Hampshire: Macmillan.
  • Parker, J. 2006. ‘Structuration's future? From “all and every” to “who did what, where, when, how and why?” Journal of Critical Realism 5(1): 122–38.
  • Porpora, D. V. 1989. ‘Four concepts of social structure’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 19(2): 195–211.
  • Roberts, J. 2014. ‘Testing the limits of structuration theory in accounting’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25(2): 135–41.
  • Roberts, J. and R. Scapens 1985. ‘Accounting systems and systems of accountability: understanding accounting practices in their organisational contexts’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 10(4): 443–56.
  • Sayer, A. 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, 2nd edn. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  • Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.
  • Scapens, R. W. and J. Roberts 1993. ‘Accounting and control: a case study of resistance to accounting and change’. Management Accounting Research 4(1): 1–32.
  • Seo, M. and W. E. D. Creed 2002. ‘Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: a dialectical perspective’. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 222–47.
  • Sewell, W. 1992. ‘A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation’. American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1–29.
  • Spaargaren, G and H. Mommaas. 2006. ‘Book Review: Structuration Theory’. Sociology 40: 1219–20.
  • Stones, R. 2001. ‘Refusing the realism-structuration divide’. European Journal of Social Theory 4: 177–97.
  • Stones, R. 2005. Structuration Theory. London: Palgrave.
  • Thompson, J. B. 1989. ‘The theory of structuration’. In Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and his Critics, eds J. B. Thompson and D. Held, 56–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Uddin, S. and M. Tsamenyi 2005. ‘Public sector reforms and the public interest: a case study of accounting control changes and performance monitoring in a Ghanaian state-owned enterprise’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 18(5): 648–74.
  • Weber, M. 1991. ‘Politics as vocation’. In Essays in Sociology, eds E. Gerth and J. R. Mills, 77–128. London: Routledge.
  • Wickramasinghe, D. and T. Hopper 2005. ‘A cultural political economy of management accounting controls: a case study of a textile mill in a traditional Sinhalese village’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16(4): 473–503.
  • Willis, P. 1977. Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.