Does Quantum Theory Redefine Realism? The Neo-Copenhagen View

References

• Aczel, A. 2003. Entanglement. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Khalili, J. 2004. Quantum: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Arianrhod, R. 2012. Seduce by Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Assiter, A. 2013. ‘Speculative and Critical Realism’. Journal of Critical Realism 12(3): 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. S. 2008. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. [1975] 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. [1979] 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1993. Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. 1950. Quantum Theory. New York: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. [1957] 1971. Causality and Chance in Modern Physics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. 2012. The Particle at the End of the Universe. Oxford: Oneworld.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castelvecchi, D. 2010. ‘‘Quantum Microphone’ Puts Visible Object in Two Places at Once’. Scientific American 302(6) (1 June): 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, B. 2014. ‘Why Many Universes Make More Sense Than One’. The Life Scientific 12: 2014. BBC, 23 September 2014, http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p026ymrs, accessed 12 October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, B., and Forshaw J.. 2011. The Quantum Universe: Everything That Can Happen Does Happen. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, A., Podolsky B., and Rosen N.. 1935. ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?’. Physical Review 47(10): 777–80.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. 1968. Ludwig Feuerbach and the Outcome of Classical German Philosophy, in Selected Works. 586–622. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• D'Espagnat, B. 2006. On Physics and Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gribbin, J. [1984] 1996. In Search of Schrödinger's Cat. London: Black Swan.
   Google Scholar
• Gribbin, J. 2012. Erwin Schrödinger and the Quantum Revolution. London: Bantam.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M. 2007. ‘Critical Realism’. In Dictionary of Critical Realism, edited by Hartwig M., 96–105. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. 1998. Science of Logic, translated by A.V. Miller. New York: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Heisenberg, W. [1958] 2000. Physics and Philosophy. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, N. 1987. Quantum Reality: Beyond the New Physics. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, A. S. 2007. ‘Léon Rosenfelds Marxist Defence of Complementarity’. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 37(Supplement): 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kastner, R. 2013. The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keat, R., and Urry J.. 1975. Social Theory as Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. 1942. ‘Newton, the Man’. Lecture prepared for the Royal Society of London, http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Extras/Keynes_Newton.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1957. The Copernican Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, M. 2008. Quantum: Einstein, Bohr and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality. Cambridge: Icon.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. 2008. Uncertainty: Einstein, Heisenberg, Bohr and the Struggle for the Soul of Science. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Makela, J. 2011. ‘Is Reality Digital or Analog?’ Foundational Questions Institute, http://www.fqxi.org/community/essay/winners/20111.
   Google Scholar
• Neffe, J. 2007. Einstein: A Biography. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, I. [1687] 2003. ‘The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy’. In On the Shoulders of Giants, edited by Hawking S., 733–1160. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, C. 2000. Quantum Theory and the Flight from Realism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 2007. ‘Realism’. In Dictionary of Critical Realism, edited by Hartwig M., 397–400. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosshauer, M., Kofler J., and Zeilinger A.. 2013. ‘A Snapshot of Foundational Attitudes toward Quantum Mechanics’. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44: 222–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz, G. 1998. ‘Critical Realism and Historical Sociology: A Review Article’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 40(1): 170–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegmark, M. 2010. ‘Many Worlds in Context’. In Many Worlds? edited by Saunders S., Barrett J., Kent A. and Wallace D., 554–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, D. 2011. ‘Physics and the Integers’. Foundational Questions Institute, http://www.fqxi.org/community/essay/winners/2011.1.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, D. 2012. ‘The Unquantum Quantum’. Scientific American 307(6): 46–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedral, V. 2011. ‘Living in a Quantum World’. Scientific American 304(6): 38–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. 2010. ‘Decoherence and Ontology (or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love FAPP)’. In Many Worlds? edited by Saunders S., Barrett J., Kent A. and Wallace D., 53–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar