Model-based human gait tracking, 3D reconstruction and recognition in uncalibrated monocular video

REFERENCES

• Cheng JC, Moura JMF. Capture and representation of human walking in live video sequence. IEEE Trans. Multimed., 1999, 1, 144–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning H, Tan T, Wang L, Hu W. Kinematics-based tracking of human walking in monocular video sequences. Image Vis. Comput., 2004, 22, 429–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeslund TB, Hilton A, Kruger V. A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and analysis. Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 2006, 104, 90–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna SJ, Jabri S, Duric Z, Rosenfeld A, Wechsler H. Tracking groups of people. Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 2000, 80, 42–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins RT, Lipton A, Fujiyoshi H, Kanade T. Algorithms for cooperative multi-sensor surveillance. Proc. IEEE, 2001, 89, 1456–1477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L. ‘On-line visual tracking with feature-based adaptive models’, MSc thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Australia, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmood K, Mrak M, Calic J, Kondoz A. Object tracking in surveillance videos using compressed domain features from scalable bit-streams. Signal Process. Image Commun., 2009, 24, 814–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delamarre Q, Faugeras O. 3D articulated models and multi-view tracking with physical forces. Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 2001, 81, 328–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thome N, Merad D, Miguet S. Learning articulated appearance models for tracking humans: a spectral graph matching approach. Signal Process. Image Commun., 2008, 23, 769–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paragios N, Deriche R. Geodesic active contours and level sets for the detection and tracking of moving objects. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 2000, 22, 266–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertalmío M, Sapiro G, Randall G. Morphing active contours. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 2000, 22, 733–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdem ÇE. Video object segmentation and tracking using region-based statistics. Signal Process. Image Commun., 2007, 22, (10), 891–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunado D, Nixon MS, Carter JN. Automatic extraction and description of human gait models for recognition purposes. Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 2003, 90, 1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little JJ, Boyd JE. Recognizing people by their gait: the shape of motion. J. Comput. Vis. Res., 1998, 1, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Green RD, Guan L. Quantifying and recognizing human movement patterns from monocular video images — Part I: A new framework for modeling human motion. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 2004, 14, 179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green RD, Guan L. Quantifying and recognizing human movement patterns form monocular video images — Part II: Applications to biometrics. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 2004, 14, 191–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagg DK, Nixon MS. On automated model-based extraction and analysis of gait, Proc. 6th IEEE Int. Conf. on Automatic face and gesture recognition: FGR ’04, Seoul, Korea, May 2004, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Lok WW, Chan KL. Model-based human motion analysis in monocular video, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustic speech and signal processing: ICASSP ’05, Philadelphia, PA, USA, March 2005, IEEE, Vol. 2, pp. 697–700.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Ning H, Tan T, Hu W. Fusion of static and dynamic body biometrics for gait recognition. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 2004, 14, (2), 149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenAbdelkader C, Culter R, Nanda H, Davis L. EigenGait: motion-based recognition of people using image self-similarity, Proc. Int. Conf. on Audio- and video-based biometric person authentication: AVBPA ’01, Halmstad, Sweden, June 2001, pp. 284–294 (Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Collins R, Gross R, Shi J. Silhouette-based human identification from body shape and gait, Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Conf. on Automatic face and gesture recognition: FGR ’02, Washington DC, USA, May 2002, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 366–371.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips P, Sarkar S, Robledo I, Grother P, Bowyer K. The gait identification challenge problem: data sets and baseline algorithm, Proc. 16th Int. Conf. on Pattern recognition: ICPR ’02, Quebec, Canada, August 2002, IEEE Computer Society, Vol. I, pp. 385–388.
   Google Scholar
• Delamarre Q, Faugeras O. 3D articulated models and multi-view tracking with silhouettes, Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Computer vision: ICCV ’99, Kerkyra, Greece, September 1999, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 716–721.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe D. Fitting parameterized 3-D models to images. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 1991, 13, 441–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachter S, Nagel HH. Tracking persons in monocular image sequences. Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 1999, 74, 174–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidenbladh H, Black M, Fleet D. Stochastic tracking of 3D human figures using 2D image motion, Proc. 6th Eur. Conf. on Computer vision: ECCV 2000, Dublin, Ireland, June–July 2000, IEEE, Vol. 2, pp. 702–718.
   Google Scholar
• Wagg DK, Nixon MS. Model-based gait enrolment in real-world imagery, Proc. Workshop on Multimodal user authentication, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, December 2003, ISCA, EURASIP and IEEE, pp. 189–195.
   Google Scholar
• Borgefors G. Hierarchical chamfer matching: a parametric edge matching algorithm. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell., 1988, 10, 849–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isard M, Blake A. CONDENSATION — conditional density propagation for visual tracking. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 1998, 29, 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CS, Elgammal A. Gait tracking and recognition using person-dependent dynamic shape model, Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Automatic face and gesture recognition: FGR ’06, Southampton, UK, April 2006, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 553–559.
   Google Scholar
• Dockstader SL, Imennov NS. Prediction for human motion tracking failures. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2006, 15, 411–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung G, Baker S, Kanade T. Shape-from-silhouette for articulated objects and its use for human body kinematics estimation and motion capture, Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer vision and pattern recognition: CVPR ’03, Madison, WI, USA, June 2003, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Menier C, Boyer E, Raffin B. 3D skeleton-based body pose recovery, Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on 3D data processing, visualisation and transmission: 3DPVT ’06, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, June 2006, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 389–396.
   Google Scholar
• Kim H, Sohn K. 3D reconstruction from stereo images for interactions between real and virtual objects. Signal Process. Image Commun., 2005, 20, 61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor CJ. Reconstruction of articulated objects from point correspondences in a single uncalibrated image. Comput. Vis. Image Underst., 2000, 80, 349–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Chen Z. Determination of human body posture from a single view. Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process., 1985, 30, 148–168.
   Google Scholar
• Remondino F, Roditakis A. 3D reconstruction of human skeleton from single images or monocular video sequences, In Pattern Recognition (Ed. B. Michaelis and G. Krell), 2003, pp. 100–107 (Springer, Berlin).
   Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Lee HJ. Knowledge-guided visual perception of 3-D human gait from a single image sequence. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 1992, 22, 336–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren X, Berg AC, Malik J. Recovering human body configurations using pairwise constraints between parts, Proc. 10th IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer vision: ICCV ’05, Beijing, China, October 2005, IEEE Computer Society, Vol. 1, pp. 824–831.
   Google Scholar
• Webb JA. Static analysis of moving jointed objects, Proc. 1st Natl. Conf. of American Association of Artificial Intelligence, Stanford, CA, USA, August 1980, AAAI, pp. 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• Jain R, Sethi IK. Establishing correspondence of nonrigid objects using smoothness of motions, Proc. 2nd IEEE Workshop on Computer vision: representation and control, Annapolis, MD, USA, April 1984, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 83–87.
   Google Scholar
• Chinese Academy of Science, Institute of Automation. Available at: <http://www.sinobiometrics.com>
   Google Scholar
• Available at: <http://www.autodesk.com>
   Google Scholar
• Passerini A, Pontil M, Frasconi P. New results on error correcting output codes of kernel machines. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 2004, 15, 45–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwaighofer A. Support vector machine toolbox for MATLAB. Version 2·51, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Niyogi SA, Adelson EH. Analyzing and recognizing walking figures in XYT, Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer vision and pattern recognition: CVPR ’94, Seattle, WA, USA, June 1994, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 469–474.
   Google Scholar
• Murase H, Sakai R. Moving object recognition in eigenspace representation: gait analysis and lip reading. Patt. Recogn. Lett., 1996, 17, 155–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri A, Fathy M, Tahery R. Human identification by gait using k-mean clustering algorithm and dynamic time warping, Proc. 12th Int. CSI Computer Conf.: CSICC’07, Tehran, Iran, February 2007, CSI, pp. 2423–2427.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y.-L, Chai J. 3D reconstruction of human motion and skeleton from uncalibrated monocular video, Proc. 9th Asian Conf. on Computer vision: ACCV ’09, Xi’an, China, September 2009, Asian Federation of Computer Vision Societies, pp. 71–82.
   Google Scholar