Adaptive, scalable and robust watermarking for wavelet-based progressive image transmission

REFERENCES

• Cox IJ, Miller ML, Bloom JA, Fridrich J, Kalker T. Digital watermarking and Steganography, 2008, 2nd edition (Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA).
   Google Scholar
• Cox IJ, Miller ML. A review of watermarking and the importance of perceptual modeling. Proc. SPIE, 1997, 3016, 92–99.
   Google Scholar
• Cvejic N. ‘Algorithms for audio watermarking and steganography’, PhD thesis, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hartung F, Kutter M. Multimedia watermarking techniques. Proc. IEEE, 1999, 87, 1079–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasdoken S, Cuhadar A. Watermarking digital image and video data. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2000, 17, 20–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potdar VM, Han S, Chang E. A survey of digital image watermarking techniques, Proc. 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. on Industrial informatics: INDIN 2005, Perth, WA, Australia, August 2005, IEEE, pp. 709–719.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker C. Hidden Bits: A Survey of Techniques for Digital Watermarking [online], 2002. [accessed at Oct. 2009], Available at: <http://www.vu.union.edu/˜shoemakc/watermarking/watermarking.html>.
   Google Scholar
• Cox IJ, Miller ML. The first 50 years of electronic watermarking. EURASIP J. Appl. Signal Process., 2002, 2002, 126–132.
   Google Scholar
• Craver S, Memon N, Yeo B, Yeung M. Resolving rightful ownerships with invisible watermarking techniques limitations, attacks, and implications. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 1998, 16, 573–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng J, Lin I, Tsai C, Chu Y. Reversible watermarking: current status and key issues. Int. J. Network Secur., 2006, 2, 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Danyali H, Deljavan Amiri M. A multiresolution robust watermarking approach for scalable wavelet image compression. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2008, 5259, 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Danyali H, Deljavan Amiri M. A scalable blind watermarking for progressive image transmission, Proc. 5th Iranian Conf. on Machine vision and image processing: MVIP 2008, Tabriz, Iran, November 2008,University of Tabriz, 11165001.
   Google Scholar
• Deljavan Amiri M, Danyali H, Zahir-Azami B. An adaptive, robust and multiresolution image watermarking for progressive wavelet image coding, Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Wireless communications, networking and mobile computing: WiCOM 2010, Chengdu, China, October 2010, IEEE, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Jayant NJ, Johnson J, Safranek R. Signal compression based on models of the human perception. Proc. IEEE, 1993, 81, 1385–1422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro JM. Embedded image coding using zerotree of wavelet coefficients. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 1993, 41, 3445–3462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chee YK. Survey of progressive image transmission methods. Int. J. Imag. Syst. Technol., 1999, 10, 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said A, Pearlman WA. A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 1996, 6, 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrier M, Cruz DS, Larsson M. JPEG2000, the next millennium compression standard for still images, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia computing systems, Florence, Italy, July 1999, IEEE, pp. 131–132.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell BG, Howard PG, LeCun YA, Puria A, Ostermann J, Civanlar MR, Rabiner L, Bottou L, Haffner P. Image and video coding-emerging standards and beyond. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 1998, 8, 814–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaid AO, Makhloufi A, Bouallegue A. Wavelet domain watermark embedding strategy using TTCQ quantization. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Network Secur., 2007, 7, 165–170.
   Google Scholar
• Parker K, M, Fowler JE. Redundant-wavelet watermarking with pixel-wise masking, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image processing: ICIP 2005, Genova, Italy, September 2005, IEEE, pp. 685–688.
   Google Scholar
• Makhloufi A, Zaid AQ, Bouallegue R, Bouallegue A. Watermark integration to wavelet image coding scheme, Proc. 8th IEEE Int. Symp. on Multimedia: ISM 2006, San Diego, CA, USA, December 2006, IEEE, pp. 685–689.
   Google Scholar
• Lee D, Kim T, Lee S, Paik J. A robust watermarking algorithm using attack pattern analysis. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2006, 4179, 757–766.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai P, Hu Y, Chang C. A progressive secret reveal system based on SPIHT image transmission. Signal Process.: Image Commun., 2004, 19, 285–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafri SAR, Baqai S. Robust digital watermarking for wavelet-based compression, Proc. IEEE 9th Workshop on Multimedia signal processing: MMSP 2007, Grete, Greece, October 2007, IEEE, pp. 377–380.
   Google Scholar
• Barni M, Bartolini F, Piva A. Improved wavelet-based watermarking through pixel-wise masking. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2001, 10, 783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang X, Zeng W, Huang J. A multi-band wavelet watermarking scheme. Int. J. Network Secur., 2008, 6, 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira S, Pun T. Robust template matching for affine resistant image watermarks. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2000, 9, 1123–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solachidis V, Pitas I. Circularly symmetric watermark embedding in 2-D DFT domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2001, 10, 1741–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levicky D, Foris P. Human visual system models in digital image watermarking. Radioengineering, 2004, 13, 38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonini M, Barlaud M, Mathieu P, Daubechies I. Image coding using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 1992, 1, 205–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2004, 13, 600–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available at: <http://www.ece.uwaterloo.ca/z70wang/research/ssim/>.
   Google Scholar
• Watson AB. DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images. Proc. SPIE, 1993, 1913, 202–216.
   Google Scholar
• Danyali H, Mertins A. Highly scalable image compression based on SPIHT for network applications, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image processing: ICIP 2002, Rochester, NY, USA,September 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Society, pp. 217–220.
   Google Scholar
• Danyali H, Mertins A. Flexible, highly scalable, object-based wavelet image compression algorithm for network applications, IEE Proc. – Vis. Image Signal Process., 2004, 151, 498–510.
   Google Scholar