REFERENCES
- National Research Council. Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, 2009 (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).
- Sheasby DR, MacDonald DG. A forensic classification of distortion in human bite marks. Forensic Sci. Int., 2001, 122, 75–78.
- Freeman AJ, Senn DR, Arendt DM. Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and bitter demographics, type of crime, and legal disposition. J. Forensic Sci., 2005, 50, 1436–1443.
- Thali MJ, Braun M, Markwalder TH, Brueschweiler W, Zollinger U, Malik NJ, Yen K, Dirnhofer R. Bite mark documentation and analysis: the forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry approach. Forensic Sci. Int., 2003, 135, 115–121.
- Blackwell SA, Taylor RV, Gordon I, Ogleby CL, Tanijiri T, Yoshino M, Donald MR, Clement JG. 3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks. Int. J. Legal Med., 2007, 121, 9–17.
- Martin-de las Heras S, Valenzuela A, Javier Valverde A, Torres JC, Luna-del-Castillo JD. Effectiveness of comparison overlays generated with DentalPrint© software in bite mark analysis. J. Forensic Sci., 2007, 52, 151–156.
- British Association of Forensic Odontology. What is a forensic odontologist and what is the scope of their work? [online], 2002. [accessed 12 April 2010]. Available at: <http://www.bafo.org.uk/guide.php>
- Federation Dentaire Internationale. Two-Digit Notation [online], 2011. [accessed 28 June 2011]. Available at: <http://www.fdiworldental.org/content/two-digit-notation>