Detection of brain tumour from MRI image using modified region growing and neural network

REFERENCES

• Bhoi N, Meher S. Total variation based wavelet domain filter for image denoising, Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Emerging trends in engineering and technology: ICETET 08, Nagpur, India, July 2008, G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering, pp. 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bhandarkar SM, Nammalwar P. Segmentation of multispectral MR images using a hierarchical self-organizing map, Proc. 14th IEEE Symp. on Computer-based medical system: CBMS 2001, Bethesda, MD, USA, July 2001, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 294–299.
   Google Scholar
• Jabbar NI, Mehrotra M. Application of fuzzy neural network for image tumor description. Proc. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2008, 34, 575–577.
   Google Scholar
• Zijdenbos A, Forghani R, Evans A. Automatic pipeline analysis of 3D MRI data for clinical trials: application to multiple sclerosis. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2002, 21, 1280–1291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Rao HY, Giannetta J, Hurt H, Wang JJ, Davatzikos C, Shen DG. Diagnosis of brain abnormality using both structural and functional MR images. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., 2006, 6585–6588.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaya J, Thanushkodi K, Karnan M. Tracking algorithm for de-noising of MR brain images. IJCSNS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Network Secur., 2009, 9, 262–267.
   Google Scholar
• Vatsa M, Singh R, Noore A. Denoising and segmentation of 3D brain images, Proc. Int. Conf. on Image processing, computer vision and pattern: IPCV 2009, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 2009, CSREA Press, pp. 561–567.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver JB, Yansun X, Healy D, Cromwell LD. Filtering noise from images with wavelet transforms. Magn. Reson. Med., 1991, 21, 288–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham DL, Xu CY, Prince JL. A survey of current methods in medical image segmentation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2000, 2, 315–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beevi SZ, Sathik MM. An effective approach for segmentation of MRI images: combining spatial information with fuzzy C-means clustering. Eur. J. Sci. Res., 2010, 41, 437–451.
   Google Scholar
• Iscan Z, Dokur Z, Ölmez T. Tumor detection by using Zernike moments on segmented magnetic resonance brain images. Expert Syst. Appl., 2010, 37, 2540–2549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kekre HB, Sarode T, Raut K. Detection of tumor in MRI using vector quantization segmentation. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2010, 2, 3753–3757.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Chung ACS. A novel framework for segmentation of deep brain structures based on Markov dependence tree. NeuroImage, 2009, 46, 1027–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corso JJ, Sharon E, Dube S, El-Saden S, Sinha U, Yuille A. Efficient multilevel brain tumor segmentation with integrated Bayesian model classification. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2008, 27, 629–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao L, Lin TS, Li B. MRI brain image segmentation and bias field correction based on fast spatially constrained kernel clustering approach. J. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 2008, 29, 1580–1588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjón JV, Carbonell-Caballero J, Lull JJ, García-Martí G, Martí-Bonmatí L, Robles M. MRI denoising using non-local means. Med. Image Anal., 2008, 12, 514–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand CS, Sahambi JS. Wavelet domain non-linear filtering for MRI denoising. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2010, 28, 842–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatsa M, Singh R, Noore A. Denoising and segmentation of 3D brain images, Proc. Int. Conf. on Image processing, computer vision and pattern: IPCV 2009, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 2009, CSREA Press, pp. 561–567.
   Google Scholar
• Thavavela V, Jaffer Basha J, Murugesan R. A novel intelligent wavelet domain noise filtration technique: application to medical images. In press, corrected proof, Expert Syst. Appl., 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Iscan Z, Dokur Z, Ölmez T. Tumor detection by using Zernike moments on segmented magnetic resonance brain images. Expert Syst. Appl., 2010, 37, 2540–2549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulaikha Beevi S, Mohamed Sathik M. An effective approach for segmentation of MRI images: combining spatial information with fuzzy C-means clustering. Eur. J. Sci. Res., 2010, 41, 437–451.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad RA, Akansu AN. A class of fast gaussian binomial filters for speech and image processing. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 1991, 39, 723–727.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson S. Stephen Johnson on Digital Photography, 2006 (O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA).
   Google Scholar
• Cybenko G. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math. Control Signals Syst., 1989, 2, 303–314.
   Google Scholar
• Hornik K. Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Networks, 1991, 4, 251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan E. Neural network classification: a Bayesian interpretation. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 1990, 1, 303–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu W, Zeng N, Wang N. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, associated confidence interval and ROC analysis with practical SAS® implementations, Proc. NESUG 2010, Baltimore, MD, USA, November 2010, NESUG, p. 9.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton N, Holt A, Scarborough J, Yan L, Gong P. Accuracy assessment measures for object-based image segmentation goodness. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 2010, 76, 289–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidner U. Contribution to the assessment of segmentation quality for remote sensing applications. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., 2008, 37, 479–484.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt WK. Digital Image Processing, 4th edition, 2007 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Los Altos, CA).
   Google Scholar