Circle detection on images based on the Clonal Selection Algorithm (CSA)

References

• Brabazon A and O’Neill M. Biologically Inspired Algorithms for financial Modelling, 2006 (Springer, Berlin).
   Google Scholar
• Chih-Chih L. A novel image segmentation approach based on particle swarm optimization. IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci., 2006, 89, 324–327.
   Google Scholar
• Le Hégarat-Mascle S, Hégarat-Mascle L, Kallel A and Descombes X. Ant colony optimization for image regularization based on a nonstationary markov modeling. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2007, 16, 865–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammouche K, Diaf M and Siarry P. Amultilevel automatic thresholding method based on a genetic algorithm for a fast image segmentation. Comput. Vis. Image Understand., 2008, 109, 163–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baştürk A and Günay E. Efficient edge detection in digital images using a cellular neural network optimized by differential evolution algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl., 2009, 36, 2645–2650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Fontoura Costa L and Marcondes Cesar R Jr. Shape Analysis and Classification, 2001 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).
   Google Scholar
• Peura M and Iivarinen J. In Advances in Visual Form Analysis (Ed. Arcelli C, Cordella L P and di Baja G S), 1997, pp.443–451 (World Scientific, Singapore).
   Google Scholar
• Yuen H, Princen J, Illingworth J and Kittler J. Comparative study of Hough transform methods for circle finding. Image Vis. Comput., 1990, 8, 71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iivarinen J, Peura M, Sarela J and Visa A. Comparison of combined shape descriptors for irregular objects, Proc. 8th British Machine Vision Conf., Cochester, UK, September 1997, University of Essex, pp. 430–439.
   Google Scholar
• Jones G, Princen J, Illingworth J and Kittler J. Robust estimation of shape parameters, Proc. British Machine Vision Conf., Oxford, UK, September 1990, BMVA, pp. 43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer M and Bolles R. Random sample consensus: a paradigm to model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM, 1981, 24, 381–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongiovanni G and Crescenzi P. Parallel simulated annealing for shape detection. Comput. Vis. Image Understand., 1995, 61, 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth G and Levine MD. Geometric primitive extraction using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1994, 16, 901–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muammar H and Nixon M. Approaches to extending the Hough transform, Proc. Int. Conf. on Acoustics, speech and signal processing: ICASSP-89, Glasgow, UK, May 1989, IEEE, Vol. 3, pp. 1556–1559.
   Google Scholar
• Atherton TJ and Kerbyson DJ. Using phase to represent radius in the coherent circle Hough transform, Proc. IEE Coll. on the Hough transform, London, UK, May 1993, IEE. 269–278.
   Google Scholar
• Shaked D, Yaron O and Kiryati N. Deriving stopping rules for the probabilistic Hough transform by sequential analysis. Comput. Vis. Image Understand., 1996, 63, 512–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M and Bolles R. Random sample consensus: a paradigm to model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM, 1981, 24, 381–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Oja E and Kultanen P. A new curve detection method: randomized Hough transform (RHT). Pattern Recogn. Lett., 1990, 11, 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JH, Koczy LT and Poston T. Fuzzy Hough transform, Proc. 2nd IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy systems, San Francisco, CA, USA, March 1993, IEEE, Vol. 2, pp. 803–808.
   Google Scholar
• Lu W and Tan JL. Detection of incomplete ellipse in images with strong noise by iterative randomized Hough transform (IRHT). Pattern Recogn., 2008, 41, 1268–1279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth G and Levine MD. Geometric primitive extraction using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1994, 16, 901–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutton E and Martinez P. A genetic algorithm for the detection 2-D geometric primitives on images, Proc. of the 12th Int. Conf. on Pattern recognition, Jerusalem, Israel, October 1994, IEEE, Vol. 1, pp. 526–528.
   Google Scholar
• Yao J, Kharma N and Grogono P. Fast robust GA-based ellipse detection, Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Pattern recognition: ICPR-04, Cambridge, UK, August 2004, IEEE, Vol. 2, pp. 859–862.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen S and Ma C. Genetic algorithm with competitive image labelling and least square. Pattern Recogn., 2000, 33, 1949–1966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayala-Ramirez V, Garcia-Capulin CH, Perez-Garcia A and Sanchez-Yanez RE. Circle detection on images using genetic algorithms. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 2006, 27, 652–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S, Das S, Biswas A and Abraham A. Automatic circle detection on digital images whit an adaptive bacterial foraging algorithm. Soft Comput., 2009, 14, 1151–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosin PL. Further five point fit ellipse fitting, Proc. 8th British Machine Vision Conf., Cochester, UK, September 1997, University of Essex, pp.290–299.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsby GA, Kindt TJ, Kuby J and Osborne BA. Immunology, 2003, 5th edition (Freeman, New York).
   Google Scholar
• de Castro LN and Timmis J. Artificial Immune Systems: A New Computational Intelligence Approach, 2002 (Springer, London).
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta D. Advances in artificial immune systems. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag., 2006, 1, 40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Gao XZ and Ovaska SJ. Artificial immune optimization methods and applications — a survey, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, man, and cybernetics, The Hague, The Netherlands, October 2004, IEEE, pp.3415–3420.
   Google Scholar
• de Castro LN and von Zuben FJ. Learning and optimization using the clonal selection principle. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 2002, 6, 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ada GL and Nossal G. The clonal selection theory. Sci. Am., 1987, 257, 50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma HP, Simon D, Fei MR and Chen ZX. On the equivalences and differences of evolutionary algorithms. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 2013, 26, 2397–2407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhart RC and Shi YH. Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 1998, 1447, 611–616.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas A, Das S, Abraham A and Dasgupta S. Stability analysis of the reproduction operator in bacterial foraging optimization. Theor. Comput. Sci., 2010, 411, 2127–2139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ülker ED and Ülker S. Comparisons study for clonal selection algorithm and genetic algorithm. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., 2012, 4, 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng Q, Zhou LS and Yue YX. A clonal selection based differential evolution algorithm for double-track railway train schedule optimization, Proc. 2nd IEEE Int. Conf. on Advanced computer control: ICACC 2010, Shenyang, China, January 2010, IEEE, 155–158.
   Google Scholar
• Yap DFW, Koh SP and Tiong SK. A comparative analysis on the performance of particle swarm optimization and artificial immune systems for mathematical test functions. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci., 2009, 3, 4344–4350.
   Google Scholar
• Coello Coello CA and Cortes NC. Solving multiobjective optimization problems using an artificial immune system. Genet. Program. Evolv. Mach., 2005, 6, 163–190.
   Google Scholar
• Campelo F, Guimaraes FG, Igarashi H and Ramirez JA. A clonal selection algorithm for optimization in electromagnetics. IEEE Trans. Magn., 2005, 41, 1736–1739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong WS, Shi GM and Li Z. Immune memory clonal selection algorithms for designing stack filters. Neurocomputing 2007, 70, 777–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong M, Jiao L, Zhang L and Du H. Immune secondary response and clonal selection inspired optimizers. Prog. Nat. Sci., 2009, 19, 237–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro L, N and von Zuben FJ. Learning and optimization using the clonal selection principle. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 2002, 6, 239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutello V, Narzisi G, Nicosia G and Pavone M. Clonal Selection Algorithms: a comparative case study using effective mutation potentials. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2005, 3627, 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gong M, Jiao L and Zhang X. A population-based artificial immune system for numerical optimization. Neurocomputing, 2008, 72, 149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Wang X and Ovaska S. Fusion of clonal selection algorithm and differential evolution method in training cascade–correlation neural network. Neurocomputing, 2009, 72, 2483–2490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poli R and Langdon WB. Foundations of Genetic Programming, 2002 (Springer, Berlin).
   Google Scholar
• Yoo J and Hajela P. Immune network simulations in multicriterion design. Struct. Optimiz., 1999, 18, 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Gao XZ and Ovaska SJ. A hybrid optimization algorithm in power filter design, Proc. 31st Annual Conf. of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Raleigh, NC, USA, November 2005, IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pp.1335–1340.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X and Zhang J. An improved immune evolutionary algorithm for multimodal function optimization, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Natural computation, Haikou, China, August 2007, IEEE, pp.641–646.
   Google Scholar
• Tang T and Qiu J. An improved multimodal artificial immune algorithm and its convergence analysis, Proc. 6th World Cong. on Intelligent control and automation, Dalian, China, June 2006, IEEE, pp.3335–3339.
   Google Scholar
• Bresenham JE. A linear algorithm for incremental digital display of circular arcs. Commun. ACM, 1987, 20, 100–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aken JR. An efficient ellipse drawing algorithm. Comput. Graph. Appl., 1984, 4, 24–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T.-C and Chung K.-L. An efficient randomized algorithm for detecting circles. Comput. Vis. Image Understand., 2001, 83, 172–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar