Assessment of the print quality parameters’ impact on the high-quality flexographic print visual experience

References

• Brody AL and Marsh KS. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology, 1997, 2nd edition, 785–787 (John Wiley & Sons, New York/Chichester/Weinheim/Brisbane/Singapore/Toronto).
   Google Scholar
• Anyadike N. Introduction to Flexible Packaging, 2003, 09–10 (Pira International, Surrey).
   Google Scholar
• DFTA and Meyer KH. Flexo Printing Technology, 2000, 4th edition, pp. 327–357 (Verlag Coating Thomas & Co., St Gallen).
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen M, Bonnier N, Hardeberg JY and Albregtsen F. Attributes of image quality for color prints. J. Electron. Imaging, 2010, 19, 011016-1–011016-13.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent GL. ‘Prediction of the substrate printing in flexography by using a new established «Printing Coefficient»’, PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Asikainen R. ‘Quality analysis of a printed natural reference image’, MSc thesis, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lundström J and Verikas A. Assessing print quality by machine in offset colour printing. Knowl.-Based Syst., 2013, 37, 70–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundström J, Verikas A, Tullander B and Larsson B. Assessing, exploring and monitoring quality of offset colour printing. Measurement, 2013, 46, 1427–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eerola T, Lensu L and Kälviäinen H. Full reference printed image quality: measurement framework and statistical evaluation. J. Imaging Sci. Technol., 2010, 54, 010201-1–010201-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eerola T, Lensu L, Kamarainen J.-K, Leisti T, Ritala R, Nyman G and Kälviäinen H. Bayesian network model of overall print quality: construction and structural optimization. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 2011, 32, 1558–1566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eerola T, Lensu L, Kälviäinen H and Bovik AC. Study of no-reference image quality assessment algorithms on printed images. J. Electron. Imaging, 2014, 23, 061106-1–061106-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchan J, Thompson RC and Manning A. A computational model of print-quality perception. Expert Syst. Appl., 1999, 17, 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perner P. A knowledge-based image-inspection system for automatic defect recognition, classification, and process diagnosis. Mach. Vis. Appl., 1994, 7, 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temponi C, Fard FD and Corley HW. A fuzzy decision model for colour reproduction. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 1999, 58, 31–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng CJ, Lee KL and Ingersoll GM. An introduction to logistic analysis and reporting. J. Educ. Res. 2002, 96, 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW and Lemeshov S. Applied Logistic Regression, 2000, 2nd edition, pp. 31–47 (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Allison PD. Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Applications, 2012, 2nd edition, 05-31 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
   Google Scholar
• Vittinghoff E, Glidden DV, Shiboski SC and McCulloch CE. Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival and Repeated Measures Models, 2004, 2nd edition, pp. 139–202 (Springer, New York/Dorecht/Heidelberg/London).
   Google Scholar
• Mesic B. ‘Printability of polyethylene coated paper and paperboard’, PhD thesis, Karlstad University, Karlstad, Sweden, 2006, pp. 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Yang L. A unified model of optical and physical dot gain in print colour reproduction. J. Imaging Sci. Technol., 2004, 48, 347–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavson S. ‘Dot gain in colour halftones’, PhD thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 1997, pp. 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Murray A. Monochrome reproduction in photoengraving. J. Franklin Inst., 1936, 221, 721–744.
   Google Scholar
• Kipphan H. Handbook of Print Media, 2001, pp. 100–103 (Springer, Berlin).
   Google Scholar
• Field GG. Colour and Its Reproduction, 1999, pp. 165–170 (GAFT Press, Pittsburgh, PA).
   Google Scholar
• Stanton A and Radencic G. Ink trapping and colourimetric variation, Proc. 53rd TAGA Int. Technical Conf., San Diego, CA, USA, March 2001, TAGE, pp. 258–281.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Information technology – office equipment – measurement of image quality parameters – binary monochrome text and graphic images’, ISO/IEC 13660:2001, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Neugebauer HEJ. Die theoretischen Grundlagen des Mehrfarbenbuch-drucks. Z. Wiss. Photogr. Photo, 1937, 36, 73–89.
   Google Scholar