Fractal compressed sensing imaging with sparse difference based on fractal and entropy recognition

References

• Candès E, Romberg J and Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2006, 52, 489–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candès E, Romberg J and Tao T. Near optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies? IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2006, 52, 5406–5425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho DL. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2006, 52, 1289–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright J, Yang AY, Ganesh A, Sastry SS and Ma Y. Robust face recognition via sparse representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2009, 31, 210–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao L, Chen S and Tan X. Sparsity preserving projections with applications to face recognition. Pattern Recogn., 2010, 43, 331–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baboulaz L and Dragotti PL. Exact feature extraction using finite rate of innovation principles with an application to image super-resolution. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2009, 18, 281–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J and Le Dimet FX. Deblurring from highly incomplete measurements for remote sensing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2009, 47, 792–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustig M, Donoho DL and Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med., 2007, 58, 1182–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallat S and Zhang Z. Matching pursuits with time–frequency dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 1993, 41, 3397–3415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candès E. Compressive sampling, Proc. Int. Cong. Mathematics 3, Madrid, Spain, August 2006, IEEE, pp. 1433–1452.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SS, Donoho DL and Saunders MA. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 1998, 20, 33–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berinde R and Indyk P. Sparse recovery using sparse random matrices. Proc. IEEE, 2010, 98, 937–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do TT, Tran TD and Gan L. Fast compressive sampling with structurally random matrices, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics,speech, and signal processing 2008: ICASSP’08, Las Vegas, NV, USA, April 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Society, pp. 3369–3372.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtaszczyk P. Stability and instance optimality for Gaussian measurements in compressed sensing. Found. Comput. Math., 2010, 10, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyré G. Best basis compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2010, 58, 2613–2622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur PL and Philipos CL. Voiced/unvoiced speech discrimination in noise using Gabor atomic decomposition, Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics,speech, and signal processing 2003: ICASSP’03, Hong Kong, China, April 2003, IEEE Signal Processing Society, pp. 820–828.
   Google Scholar
• ORL Database. Available at: <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/dtg/attarchive/facedatabase.html>
   Google Scholar
• ALOI Database. Available at: <http://aloi.science.uva.nl/>
   Google Scholar
• Romberg J. Imaging via compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 2008, 25, 14–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shechtman Y, Gazit S, Szameit A, Eldar YC and Segev M. Super-resolution and reconstruction of sparse images carried by incoherent light. Opt. Lett., 2010, 35, 1148–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis L, Lorenz D, Thiébaut E, Fournier C and Trede D. Inline hologram reconstruction with sparsity constraints. Opt. Lett., 2009, 34, 3475–3477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazit S, Szameit A, Eldar YC and Segev M. Super-resolution and reconstruction of sparse sub-wavelength images. Opt. Express, 2009, 17, 23920–23946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle DC. Automatic PCA dimension selection for high dimensional data and small sample sizes. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2008, 9, 2733–2759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung S and Marron JS. PCA consistency in high dimension, low sample size context. Ann. Stat., 2009, 37, 4104–4130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Perera A and Gutierrez-Osuna R. Principal discriminants analysis for small-sample-size problems application to chemical sensing, Proc. IEEE Sensors 2004, Vienna, Austria, October 2004, Vienna University of Technology, pp. 591–594.
   Google Scholar
• Tang YY, Tao Y and Lam ECM. New method for feature extraction based on fractal behavior. Pattern Recogn., 2002, 35, 1071–1081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WL and Hsieh KS. A robust algorithm for the fractal dimension of images and its applications to the classification of natural images and ultrasonic liver images. Signal Process., 2010, 90, 1894–1904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz A, Akin M, Poyraz M and Kirbas G. Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for vigilance level estimation by using wavelet-entropy feature extraction. Exp. Syst. Appl., 2009, 36, 7390–7399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MY and Yang CY. Entropy-based feature extraction and decision tree induction for breast cancer diagnosis with standardized thermograph images. Comput. Meth. Programs Biomed., 2010, 100, 269–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Y, Lam ECM and Tang YY. Feature extraction using wavelet and fractal. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 2001, 22, 271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussa SB, Zahour A, Benabdelhafid A and Alimi AM. New features using fractal multi-dimensions for generalized Arabic font recognition. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 2010, 31, 361–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu HG, Wang J and Huang XB. Fabric defect detection based on multiple fractal features and support vector data description. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 2009, 22, 224–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz RL, Mancini HL and Calbet X. A statistical measure of complexity. Phys .Lett. A, 1995, 209, 321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman DP and Crutchfield JP. Measures of statistical complexity: why?. Phys. Lett. A, 1998, 238, 244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiner JS, Davison M and Landsberg PT. Simple measure for complexity. Phys. Rev. E, 1999, 59, 1459–1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das K and Nenadic Z. Approximate information discriminant analysis: a computationally simple heteroscedastic feature extraction technique. Pattern Recogn., 2008, 41, 1548–1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hild KE, Erdogmus D, Torkkola K and Principe JCFeature extraction using information-theoretic learning. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2006, 28, 1385–1392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins PS and Zucker SW. Greedy basis pursuit. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2007, 55, 3760–3772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo MAT, Nowak RD and Wright SJ. Gradient projection for sparse reconstruction application to compressed sensing and other inverse problems. IEEE J. Sel. Top Signal Process., 2007, 1, 586–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumensath T and Davies ME. Gradient pursuits. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 2008, 56, 2370–2382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva ARF. Atomic decomposition with evolutionary pursuit. Digit. Signal Process., 2003, 13, 317–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport MA and Wakin MB. Analysis of orthogonal matching pursuit using the restricted isometry property. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2010, 56, 4395–4401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei D and Milenkovic O. Subspace pursuit for compressive sensing signal reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2009, 55, 2230–2249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath G and Guillemot C. On a simple derivation of the complementary matching pursuit. Signal Process., 2010, 90, 702–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh-Thu Q and Ghanbari M. Scope of validity of PSNR in image–video quality assessment. Electron. Lett., 2008,44, 800–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR and Simoncelli EP. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2004, 13, 600–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar