Practical servoing of VTOL UAVs from object of unknown 3D geometry: new hybrid approach

References

• Engel, J., Sturm, J. and Cremers, D. Camera-based navigation of a low-cost quadrocopter. Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent robots systems, October 2012, IEEE, pp. 2815–2821.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, S., Scaramuzza, D. and Siegwart, R. Monocular SLAM based navigation for autonomous micro helicopters in GPS-denied environments. J. Field Robot., 2011, 28/6, 854–874. doi: 10.1002/rob.20412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malis, E. and Chaumette, F. 2 1/2 d visual servoing with respect to unknown objects through a new estimation scheme of camera displacement. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 2000, 37/1, 79–97. doi: 10.1023/A:1008181530296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araar, O. and Aouf, N. A new hybrid approach for the visual servoing of VTOL UAVS from unknown geometries. Proc. 2014 22nd Mediterranean Conf. on Control and automation (MED), June 2014, pp. 1425–1432.
   Google Scholar
• Malis, E., Chaumette, F. and Boudet, S. 2 1/2 D visual servoing. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., 1999, 15, 238–250. doi: 10.1109/70.760345
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., Dixon, W. E., Dawson, D. M. and Chawda, P. Homography-based visual servo regulation of mobile robots. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 2005, 35, 1041–1050. doi: 10.1109/TSMCB.2005.850155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariottini, G. Image-based visual servoing for nonholonomic mobile robots using epipolar geometry. IEEE Trans. Robot., 2007, 23/1, 87–100. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2006.886842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, D. and Jawahar, C. Robust homography-based control for camera positioning in piecewise planar environments. In Kalra, P. K. and Peleg, S. (eds.). Computer vision, graphics and image processing, 2006 (Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg), pp. 906–918.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. and Ostrowski, J. Robust visual servoing based on relative orientation. Proc. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer vision and pattern recognition, Fort Collins, CO, USA, June 1999, IEEE Computer Society, Cat. no PR00149, pp. 574–580.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Nicolas, G., Sagues, C. and Guerrero, J. J. Parking with the essential matrix without short baseline degeneracies. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and automation, Kobe, Japan, May 2009, IEEE, pp. 1098–1103.
   Google Scholar
• Rives, P. Visual servoing based on epipolar geometry. Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent robots and systems, Takamatsu, Japan, October–November 2000, IEEE, pp. 602–607.
   Google Scholar
• de Plinval, H., Morin, P., Mouyon, P. and Hamel, T. Visual servoing for underactuated VTOL UAVs: a linear, homography-based approach. Proc. 2011 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and automation, Shanghai, China, May 2011, IEEE, pp. 3004–3010.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, D., Hamel, T. and Mahony, R. Visual servo control using homography estimation for the stabilization of an x4-flyer. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Decision and control, Las Vegas, NV, USA, December 2002, IEEE, pp. 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X.-S., Hou, X.-R., Tang, J. and Cheng, H.-F. Complete solution classification for the perspective-three-point problem. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2003, 25, 930–943. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1217599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan, L. and Lan, Z. Linear n-point camera pose determination. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1999, 21/7, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, R. In defense of the eight-point algorithm. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1997, 19, 580–593. doi: 10.1109/34.601246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, R. and Zisserman, A. Multiview geometry in computer vision. 2nd edn, 2004 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
   Google Scholar
• Chaumette, F. and Hutchinson, S. Visual servo control. I: basic approaches. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag., 2006, 82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Bourquardez, O., Mahony, R., Guenard, N., Chaumette, F., Hamel, T. and Eck, L. Image-based visual servo control of the translation kinematics of a quadrotor aerial vehicle. IEEE Trans. Robot., 2009, 25/3, 743–749. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2008.2011419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araar, O., Nabil, A. and Dietz, L. V. Power pylon detection and monocular depth estimation from inspection UAVs. Ind. Robot, 2015, 42/3, 200–213. doi: 10.1108/IR-11-2014-0419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. and Stephens, M. A combined corner and edge detector. Proc. Alvey Vision Conf. 1988, Manchester, UK, August–September 1988 pp. 23.1–23.6.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, J. and Tomasi, C. Good features to track. Proc. IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer vision and pattern recognition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 1994, IEEE, pp. 593–600.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B. and Kanade, T. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. Proc. 7th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial intelligence, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 1981, Vol. 130 pp. 674–679.
   Google Scholar
• Bouguet, J. Pyramidal implementation of the affine Lucas Kanade feature tracker description of the algorithm, 2001 (Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA)
   Google Scholar
• Lowe, D. G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 2004, 60, 91–110. doi: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torr, P. and Murray, D. The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 1997, 24/3, 271–300. doi: 10.1023/A:1007927408552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, M. and Bolles, R. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM, 1981, 24/6) doi: 10.1145/358669.358692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torr, P. and Murray, D. Outlier detection and motion segmentation. Prco. Conf. Sensor Fusion VI, Boston, MA, USA, September 1993, pp. 432–443.
   Google Scholar
• Ar.drone simulator. http://wiki.ros.org/tum_simulator.
   Google Scholar