References
- Yamaguchi, I. A laser speckle strain gauge. J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum., 1981, 14, 1270–1273. doi: 10.1088/0022-3735/14/11/012
- Peter, W. H. and Ranson, W. F. Digital imaging technique in experimental stress analysis. Opt. Eng., 1982, 21/3, 427–431.
- Pan, B. Recent progress in digital image correlation. Exp. Mech., 2011, 51, 1223–1235. doi: 10.1007/s11340-010-9418-3
- Eskandari, M., et al. In-situ strain localization analysis in low density transformation-twinning induced plasticity steel using digital image correlation. Opt. Lasers Eng., 2015, 67, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.10.005
- Pan, B., et al. Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review. Meas. Sci. Technol., 2009, 20/6, 062001. doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/20/6/062001
- Tong, W. An evaluation of digital image correlation criteria for strain mapping applications. Strain, 2005, 41/4, 167–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2005.00227.x
- Pan, B., et al. Digital image correlation using iterative least squares and pointwise least squares for displacement field and strain field measurements. Opt. Lasers Eng., 2009, 47, 865–874. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.10.014
- Liu, X. Y., et al. Performance of iterative gradient-based algorithms with different intensity change models in digital image correlation. Opt. Laser Technol., 2012, 44/4, 1060–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2011.10.009
- Peng, B., et al. Modified correlation criterion for digital image correlation considering the effect of lighting variations in deformation measurements. Opt. Eng., 2012, 51/1, 017004. doi: 10.1117/1.OE.51.1.017004
- Sutton, M. A., Orteu, J. J. and Schreier, H. W. Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements, 2009, Springer.
- Zhou, P. and Goodson, K. E. Subpixel displacement and deformation gradient measurement using digital image/speckle correlation. Opt. Eng., 2001, 40/8, 1613–1620. doi: 10.1117/1.1387992
- Schreier, H. W. and Sutton, M. A. Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions. Exp. Mech., 2002, 42/3, 303–310. doi: 10.1007/BF02410987
- Jackway, P. T. Improved morphological Top-hat. IEEE Electron. Lett., 2000, 36/14, 1194–1195. doi: 10.1049/el:20000873
- Liu, L. and Zhao, Z. M. Morphological image processing in the speckle metrology. Imaging Sci. J., 2011, 59, 303–310. doi: 10.1179/1743131X10Y.0000000020
- Pan, B., Lu, Z. X. and Xie, H. M. Mean intensity gradient: an efficient global parameter for quality assessment of the speckle patterns used in digital image correlation. Opt. Lasers Eng., 2010, 48, 469–477. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2009.08.010
- Yu, H., et al. Application of the mean intensity of the second derivative in evaluating the speckle patterns in digital image correlation. Opt. Lasers Eng., 2014, 60, 32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2014.03.015
- Yao, S., et al. Parameter estimation for HFM signals using combined STFT and iteratively reweighted least squares linear fitting. Signal. Process., 2014, 99, 92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2013.12.029
- Abedin, K. M., Wahadoszamen, M. and Haider, A. F. M. Y. Measurement of in-plane motions and rotations using a simple electronic speckle pattern interferometry. Opt. Laser Technol., 2002, 34/4, 293–298. doi: 10.1016/S0030-3992(02)00016-6