Measuring outcome after severe TBI

References

• Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, NCfIPaC, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Thurman DJ, Alverson C, Dunn KA, Guerrero J, Sniezek JE. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: a public health perspective. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14:602–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Dawson DR, McLellan BA. Head injury in young adults: long-term outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:550–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilfoyle MR, Seeley HM, Corteen E, Harkin C, Richards H, Menon DK, et al.. Assessing quality of life after traumatic brain injury: examination of the short form 36 health survey. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:2173–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paniak C, Phillips K, Toller-Lobe G, Durand A, Nagy J. Sensitivity of three recent questionnaires to mild traumatic brain injury-related effects. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14:211–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Smith-Knapp K, Granger CV. Outcomes in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter M, Sullivan M, Dahllof AG, Siosteen A. Partner relationships, functioning, mood and global quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury. Spinal Cord. 1998;36:252–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temkin N, McLean A, Dikmen S, Gale J, Bergner M, Almes MJ. Development and evaluation of modifications to the sickness impact profile for head injury. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella G, Ford B, Moran C. Survival of social relationships following head injury. Int Disabil Stud. 1989;11:9–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Carroll RE, Woodrow J, Maroun F. Psychosexual and psychosocial sequelae of closed head injury. Brain Inj. 1991;5:303–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resch JA, Villarreal V, Johnson CL, Elliott TR, Kwok OM, Berry JW, et al.. Trajectories of life satisfaction in the first 5 years following traumatic brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2009;54:51–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein E, Corso PS, Miller TR. The incidence and economic burden of injuries in the United States. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Langfitt TW. Measuring the outcome from head injuries. J Neurosurg. 1978;48:673–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Marmarou A, Choi S, Maas A, Murray G, Steyerberg EW. Mortality from traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;95:281–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein SC, Georgoff P, Meghan S, Mizra K, Sonnad SS. 150 years of treating severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of progress in mortality. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1343–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas AI, Roozenbeek B, Manley GT. Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: past experience and current developments. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7:115–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas AI, Menon DK, Lingsma HF, Pineda JA, Sandel ME, Manley GT. Re-orientation of clinical research in traumatic brain injury: report of an international workshop on comparative effectiveness research. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:32–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde EA, Whiteneck GG, Bogner J, Bushnik T, Cifu DX, Dikmen S, et al.. Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:1650–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale GM, Pettigrew LE, Wilson JT, Murray G, Jennett B. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:587–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1:480–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N. Disability after severe head-injury – observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;44:285–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas AI, Braakman R, Schouten HJ, Minderhoud JM, van Zomeren AH. Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 1983;58:321–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson SI, Housley AM, Jones PA, Slattery J, Miller JD. Glasgow Outcome Scale: an inter-rater reliability study. Brain Inj. 1993;7:309–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson JTL, Pettigrew LEL, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, Boake C, Song J, Mccauley S, Contant C, Diaz-Marchan P, et al.. Validity and sensitivity to change of the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18:575–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir J, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Lu J, Lingsma HF, McHugh GS, et al.. Does the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale add value to the conventional Glasgow Outcome Scale? J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:53–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department CHR. Craig handicap assessment and reporting technique short form (CHART-SF) manual. Englewood, CO: Craig Hospital; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusick CP, Gerhart KA, Mellick DC. Participant-proxy reliability in traumatic brain injury outcome research. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15:739–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellick D, Brooks CA, Harrison-Felix C, Whiteneck GG. Craig handicap assessment and reporting technique (CHART): a new short form. In: Annual meeting of the American Public Health Association. Boston, MA; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gontkovsky ST, Russum P, Stokic DS. Comparison of the CIQ and CHART short form in assessing community integration in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Neuro Rehabilitation. 2009;24:185–92.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, Belleza T, Cope DN. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:118–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvier WD, Blanton PD, LaPorte KK, Nepomuceno C. Reliability and validity of the disability rating scale and the levels of cognitive functioning scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:94–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall K, Cope DN, Rappaport M. Glasgow Outcome Scale and disability rating scale: comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:35–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SC, Marmarou A, Bullock R, Nichols JS, Wei X, Pitts LH. The American Brain Injury Consortium Study Group. Primary end points in phase III clinical trials of severe head trauma: DRS versus GOS. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:771–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla D, Devi BI, Agrawal A. Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011;113:435–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke. 2011;42:1146–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgalla MH, Will BE, Roser F, Tatagiba M. Do long-term results justify decompressive craniectomy after severe traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurg. 2008;109:685–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell J, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:193–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson KM, Pentland B. Disability in patients following traumatic brain injury – which measure? Int J Rehabil Res. 1997;20:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts KF, Caro JJ. The Barthel index and modified Rankin scale as prognostic tools for long-term outcomes after stroke: a qualitative review of the literature. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23:1627–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV. The emerging science of functional assessment: our tool for outcomes analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:235–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielesny M, Sherwin FS. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 1986;1:59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton B, Laughlin J, Granger C, Kayton R. Interrater agreement of the seven level functional independence measure (FIM). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:790.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:127–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Johnston MV. Outcomes evaluation in TBI rehabilitation. Part II: measurement tools for a nationwide data system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:SC10-8; discussion SC 27–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall K, Mann N, High W, Wright K, Kreutzer J, Wood D. Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: ceiling effects of FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS and CIQ. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KM. The functional assessment measure. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas. 1997;1:63–5.
   Google Scholar
• Dikmen S, Machamer J, Miller B, Doctor J, Temkin N. Functional status examination: a new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18:127–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak AM, Caesar RR, Frol AB, Krueger K, Harper CR, Nancy R, et al.. Functional outcome scales in traumatic brain injury: a comparison of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (extended) and the functional status examination. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:1319–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter S, Leigh E, Wade D, Fleminger S. The Rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire: a confirmatory factor analysis. J Neurol. 2006;253:1603–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyres S, Carey A, Gilworth G, Neumann V, Tennant A. Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:878–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinidou F, Thomas RD, Scharp VL, Laske KM, Hammerly MD, Guitonde S. Effects of categorization training in patients with TBI during postacute rehabilitation: preliminary findings. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005;20:143–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen C, Malkmus D, Durham P. Levels of cognitive functioning. Downey, CA: Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Rao N, Kilgore KM. Predicting return to work in traumatic brain injury using assessment scales. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:911–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock MR, Merchant RE, Choi SC, Gilman CB, Kreutzer JS, Marmarou A, et al.. Outcome measures for clinical trials in neurotrauma. Neurosurg Focus. 2002;13:ECP1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reitan RM. The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. J Consult Psychol. 1955;19:393–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wechsler D.W.. Adult Intelligence Scale III. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment Inc; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D.W.. Adult Intelligence Scale IV. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment Inc; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Malec JF. Impact of comprehensive day treatment on societal participation for persons with acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:885–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malec JF, Degiorgio L. Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful completers of 3 postacute brain injury rehabilitation pathways. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1759–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Seale GS, Caroselli JS, High WM, Becker CL, Neese LE, Scheibel R. Use of community integration questionnaire (CIQ) to characterize changes in functioning for individuals with traumatic brain injury who participated in a post-acute rehabilitation programme. Brain Inj. 2002;16:955–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill J, Hibbard MR, Brown M, Jaffe M, Sliwinski M, Vandergoot D, et al.. The effect of employment on quality of life and community integration after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13:68–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay J, Friel JC. Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:943–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: a review of community integration questionnaire studies. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997;12:74–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985;49:71–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP. Correlates of life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:867–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Bogner JA, Mysiw WJ, Clinchot D, Fugate L. Life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001;16:543–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MR, Noonan VK, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:438–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findler M, Cantor J, Haddad L, Gordon W, Ashman T. The reliability and validity of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire for use with individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2001;15:715–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilfoyle MR, Seeley HM, Corteen E, Harkin C, Richards H, Menon DK, et al.. Assessing quality of life after traumatic brain injury: examination of the short form 36 health survey. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:2173–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert-Gruner M, Maegele M, Haverkamp H, Klug N, Wedekind C. Health-related quality of life during the first year after severe brain injury with and without polytrauma. Brain Inj. 2007;21:451–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne G, Gruen RL, Kaye AH. Traumatic brain injury and long-term quality of life: findings from an Australian study. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:1623–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M. SF-36 Health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center Hospitals; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow outcome scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69:204–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol AD, Higgins AM, Gabbe BJ, Murray LJ, Cooper DJ, Cameron PA. Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists. Injury. 2011;42:281–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The health utilities index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilson BS, Gilson JS, Bergner M, Bobbit RA, Kressel S, Pollard WE, et al.. The sickness impact profile. Development of an outcome measure of health care. Am J Public Health. 1975;65:1304–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19:787–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagulayan KF, Temkin NR, Machamer J, Dikmen SS. A longitudinal study of health-related quality of life after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:611–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truelle JL, Koskinen S, Hawthorne G, Sarajuuri J, Formisano R, Von Wild K, et al.. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: the clinical use of the QOLIBRI, a novel disease-specific instrument. Brain Inj. 2010;24:1272–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truelle JL, von Wild K, Hofer S, Neugebauer E, Lischetzke T, von Steinbuchel N. The QOLIBRI – towards a quality of life tool after traumatic brain injury: current developments in Asia. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2008;101:125–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawthorne G, Kaye AH, Gruen R, Houseman D, Bauer I. Traumatic brain injury and quality of life: initial Australian validation of the QOLIBRI. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18:197–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Steinbuchel N, Wilson L, Gibbons H, Hawthorne G, Höfer S, Schmidt S, et al.. Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): scale validity and correlates of quality of life. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1157–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailhan L, Azouvi P, Dazord A. Life satisfaction and disability after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19:227–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman-Pare D, Colantonio A, Ratcliff G, Chase S, Vernich L. Factors associated with perceived quality of life many years after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001;16:330–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Divan N, Fiedler RC. Functional assessment scales. A study of persons after traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74:107–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen S. Quality of life 10 years after a very severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): the perspective of the injured and the closest relative. Brain Inj. 1998;12:631–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boake C, High WM. Functional outcome from traumatic brain injury: unidimensional or multidimensional? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;75:105–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick HA, Doshi JA, Sonnad SS, Polsky D. Economic evaluation in clinical trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols J, Chambers I, Taga T, Smith A. Physiological rationale for responsiveness of mouse embryonic stem cells to gp130 cytokines. Development. 2001;128:2333–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks P, Lubetkin EI, Gold MR, Tancredi DJ, Jia H. Mapping the SF-12 to the EuroQol EQ-5D Index in a national US sample. Med Decis Making. 2004;24:247–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol MB, Sengupta N, Globe DR. Evaluating quality-adjusted life years: estimation of the health utility index (HUI2) from the SF-36. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:105–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1115–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosty J, Macyszyn L, Lai K, McCroskery J, Park HR, Stein SC. Relating quality of life to Glasgow outcome scale health states. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:1322–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray GD, Barer D, Choi S, Fernandes H, Gregson B, Lees KR, et al.. Design and analysis of phase III trials with ordered outcome scales: the concept of the sliding dichotomy. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:511–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1944.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A social tariff for the EuroQol: Results from a UK general population survey. York: University of York, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Fryback DG. Measuring health-related quality of life. In: Workshop on advancing social science theory: the importance of common metrics. Washington, DC: The National Academies DoBaSSaE, 2010.
   Google Scholar