Value of multimodality monitoring using brainstem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials in endoscopic endonasal surgery

References

• Sindou M, Fobé JL, Ciriano D, Fischer C. Hearing prognosis and intraoperative guidance of brainstem auditory evoked potential in microvascular decompression. Laryngoscope. 1992;102(6):678–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatayama T, Møller AR. Correlation between latency and amplitude of peak V in the brainstem auditory evoked potentials: intraoperative recordings in microvascular decompression operations. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(7):681–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins RH, Radtke RA, Erwin CW. Value of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring in reducing the auditory morbidity associated with microvascular decompression of cranial nerves. Skull Base Surg. 1991;1(2):106–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R. The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1 Suppl):E213; discussion E213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejjani GK, Nora PC, Vera PL, Broemling L, Sekhar LN. The predictive value of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring: review of 244 procedures. Neurosurgery. 1998;43(3):491–8; discussion 498–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentili F, Lougheed WM, Yamashiro K, Corrado C. Monitoring of sensory evoked potentials during surgery of skull base tumours. Can J Neurol Sci. 1985;12(4):336–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thirumala PD, Kassasm AB, Habeych M, Wichman K, Chang YF, Gardner P, et al.. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgery: analysis of observed changes. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(1 Suppl Operative):ons64–76; discussion ons76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penchet G, Arné P, Cuny E, Monteil P, Loiseau H, Castel JP. Use of intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials to prevent ischaemic stroke after surgical exclusion of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2007;149(4):357–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guérit JM, Witdoeckt C, de Tourtchaninoff M, Ghariani S, Matta A, Dion R, et al.. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery. I. Relationships between qualitative SEP alterations and intraoperative events. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;104(6):459–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Vleeschauwer P, Horsch S, Matamoros R. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials in carotid surgery: results, usefulness and limitations of the method. Ann Vasc Surg. 1988;2(1):63–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Bose B, Li M, et al.. Neurophysiological identification of position-induced neurologic injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20(6):437–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung I, Glow JA, Dimopoulos V, Walid MS, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, et al.. Upper-limb somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in lumbosacral spine surgery: a prognostic marker for position-related ulnar nerve injury. Spine J. 2009;9(4):287–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller AR, Møller MB. Does intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials reduce incidence of hearing loss as a complication of microvascular decompression of cranial nerves? Neurosurgery. 1989;24(2):257–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassam A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, Mintz A. Evolution of reconstructive techniques following endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kassam AB, Gardner P, Snyderman C, Mintz A, Carrau R. Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(1):E6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Grahovac S, et al.. Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(1):6–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzer JR, Rose RD, Welch WC, Sclabassi RJ. Simultaneous somatosensory evoked potential and electromyographic recordings during lumbosacral decompression and instrumentation. Neurosurgery. 1998;42(6):1318–24; discussion 1324–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polo G, Fischer C, Sindou MP, Marneffe V. Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes and warning values to prevent hearing loss–prospective study in a consecutive series of 84 patients. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(1):97–104; discussion 104–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little JR, Lesser RP, Lueders H, Furlan AJ. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in posterior circulation surgery. Neurosurgery. 1983;12(5):496–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramnarayan R, Mackenzie I. Brain-stem auditory evoked responses during microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: predicting post-operative hearing loss. Neurol India. 2006;54(3):250–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZY, Wong HK, Chan YH. Variability of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(6):470–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York DH, Chabot RJ, Gaines RW. Response variability of somatosensory evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987;12(9):864–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappa KH, Harrison JL, Brooks EB, Young RR. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in 200 patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1980;7(2):135–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stippler M, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(2):268–77; discussion 277–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willie CK, Macleod DB, Shaw AD, Smith KJ, Tzeng YC, Eves ND, et al.. Regional brain blood flow in man during acute changes in arterial blood gases. J Physiol. 2012;590(Pt 14):3261–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baik MW, Branston NM, Bentivoglio P, Symon L. The effects of experimental brain-stem ischaemia on brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in primates. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990;75(5):433–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hata R, Matsumoto M, Hatakeyama T, Ohtsuki T, Handa N, Niinobe M, et al.. Differential vulnerability in the hindbrain neurons and local cerebral blood flow during bilateral vertebral occlusion in gerbils. Neuroscience. 1993;56(2):423–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branston NM, Bentivoglio P, Momma F, Symon L. Changes in pyramidal tract conduction with experimental brain-stem ischaemia in the monkey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;69(5):469–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heiss WD. Flow thresholds of functional and morphological damage of brain tissue. Stroke. 1983;14(3):329–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrup J, Blennow G, Nilsson B. Effects of reduced cerebral blood flow upon EEG pattern, cerebral extracellular potassium, and energy metabolism in the rat cortex during bicuculline-induced seizures. Brain Res. 1979;177(1):115–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar