The electronic counting arm movement test (eCAM test)

References

• Prablanc C, Pélisson D, Goodale MA. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand. Exp Brain Res. 1986;62(2):293–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansay C, Manto M, Camut S, Bodranghien F. The CAM test: a novel tool to quantify upper limb pointing movements in the vertical plane. 2013. Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:1–97.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman C, Hughes A-M, Burridge J, Chappell P, Lewin P, Rogers E. Iterative learning control of fes applied to the upper extremity for rehabilitation. Control Eng Practice. 2009;17(3):368–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi M, Takeda K, Otaka Y, Osu R, Hanakawa T, Gouko M, et al. Event related desynchronization-modulated functional electrical stimulation system for stroke rehabilitation: a feasi- bility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012;9(1):56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• del Ama AJ, Gil-Agudo Á, Pons JL, Moreno JC. Hybrid fes-robot cooperative control of ambulatory gait rehabilitation exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mangold S, Schuster C, Keller T, Zimmermann-Schlatter A, Ettlin T. Motor training of upper extremity with functional electrical stimulation in early stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(2):184–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonsey R, Barr RC. Bioelectricity: a quantitative approach. New York: Springer; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Arduino.cc [Internet]. Arduino Uno board specs (cited 2014 June 23). Available from: http://arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoBoardUno.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9(1):97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian AJ, Thach WT. Cerebellar outflow lesions: a comparison of movement deficits resulting from lesions at the levels of the cerebellum and thalamus. Ann Neurol. 1995;38(6):881–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• du Montcel ST, Charles P, Ribai P, Got C, Le Bayon A, Labauge P, et al. Composite cerebellar functional severity score: validation of a quantitative score of cerebellar impairment. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 5):1352–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimaldi G, Fernandez A, Manto M. Augmented visual feedback counteracts the effects of surface muscular functional electrical stimulation on physiological tremor. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dempster W. Space requirements of the seated operator. Ohio: Wright-Patterson Air Force Base; 1955 (WADC TR 55-159).
   Google Scholar
• Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Boessenkool J, Nijhof E-J, Erkelens C. A comparison of curvatures of left and right hand movements in a simple pointing task. Exp Brain Res. 1998;120(3):369–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myles K, Binseel MS. The tactile modality: a review of tactile sensitivity and human tactile interfaces, Tech. rep., DTIC Document; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Abraira VE, Ginty DD. The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron. 2013;79(4):618–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadmore K, Exell T, Freeman C, Kutlu M, Rogers E, Hughes A-M, et al. Electrical stimulation and iterative learning control for functional recovery in the upper limb post-stroke. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2013;2013. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wu F-C, Lin Y-T, Kuo T-S, Luh J-J, Lai J-S. Clinical effects of combined bilateral arm training with functional electrical stimulation in patients with stroke. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2011;2011. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• McGie SC, Zariffa J, Popovic MR, Nagai MK. Short-term neuroplastic effects of brain-controlled and muscle-controlled electrical stimulation. Neuromodulation. doi: 10.1111/ner.12185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecatto RB, Maximino JR, Chadi G. Motor recovery and cortical plasticity after functional electrical stimulation in a rat model of focal stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(9):791–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson AK, Stein RB, Chen XY, Wolpaw JR. Modulation in spinal circuits and corticospinal connections following nerve stimulation and operant conditioning. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;1:2138–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawashima N, Popovic MR, Zivanovic V. Effect of intensive functional electrical stimulation therapy on upper-limb motor recovery after stroke: case study of a patient with chronic stroke. Physiotherapy Canada. 2013;65(1):20–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein RB, Everaert DG, Roy FD, Chong S, Soleimani M. Facilitation of corticospinal connections in able-bodied people and people with central nervous system disorders using eight interventions. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;30(1):66–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding P, Riddoch MJ. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the upper limb alleviates unilateral neglect: a case series analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2009;19(1):41–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier E. Sémiologie EMG élémentaire. Lavoisier: Médecine Sciences publications. 2013. p. 139–67.
   Google Scholar
• Green LA, Parro JJ, Gabriel DA. Beneficial effects of serial contractions on muscle performance after a brief period of rest. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(8):1657–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara Y, Obayashi S, Tsujiuchi K, Muraoka Y. The effects of electromyography-controlled functional electrical stimulation on upper extremity function and cortical perfusion in stroke patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124(10):2008–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith NP, Barclay CJ, Loiselle DS. The efficiency of muscle contraction. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2005;88(1):1–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crevecoeur F, McIntyre J, Thonnard J-L, Lefévre P. Gravity-dependent estimates of object mass underlie the generation of motor commands for horizontal limb movements. J Neurophysiol. 2014;112(2):384–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Song W-K, Lee J, Lee H-Y, Park DS, Ko B-W, et al. Kinematic analysis of upper extremity movement during drinking in hemiplegic subjects. Clin Biomech. 2014;29(3):248–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essers JMNH, Meijer K, Murgia A, Bergsma A, Verstegen P. An inverse dynamic analysis on the influence of upper limb gravity compensation during reaching. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2013;2013. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar