Semistatic Animation – Integrating Past, Present and Future in Map Animations

REFERENCES

• Acevedo W. (1997). ‘Time-series animation techniques for visualizing urban growth’, Computers & Geosciences, 23, pp. 423–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertin J. (1983). Semiology of Graphics, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Blok C, Kobben B, Cheng T, Kuterema AA. (1999). ‘Visualization of relationships between spatial patterns in time by cartographic animation’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 26, pp. 139–151.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler ME. (1998). ‘The effects of prior knowledge on children’s abilities to read static and animated maps’, MSc thesis, University of South Carolina, Columbia, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge M, McDerby M, Turner M. (2008). Geographic Visualization: Concepts, Tools and Applications: Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Encyclopedia Britannica. (2011). Britannica Online Encyclopedia – Eadweard Muybridge. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/399928/Eadweard-Muybridge (accessed 24 February 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Fabrikant SI, Rebich-Hespanha S, Andrienko N, Andrienko G, Montello DR. (2008). ‘Novel method to measure inference affordance in static small-multiple map displays representing dynamic processes’, The Cartographic Journal, 45, pp. 201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrikant S, Goldsberry K. (2005). ‘Thematic Relevance and Perceptual Salience of Dynamic Geovisualization Displays’, in 22nd ICA International Cartographic Conference: Mapping Approaches into a Changing World, Theme 15.Oral 3-5. CD-ROM. A Coruna, Jul 9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrikant S, Rebich-Hespanha S, Andrienko N, Andrienko G, Montello D. (2008). ‘Novel method to measure inference affordance in static small-multiple map displays representing dynamic processes’, The Cartographic Journal, 45, pp. 201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friendly M. (2002). ‘Visions and re-visions of Charles Joseph Minard’, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, pp. 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin AL, MacEachren AM, Hardisty F, Steiner E, Li B. (2006). ‘A comparison of animated maps with static small-multiple maps for visually identifying space–time clusters’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, pp. 740–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrower M. (2001). ‘Visualizing change: using cartographic animation to explore remotely-sensed data’, Cartographic Perspectives, 39, pp. 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Harrower M. (2003). ‘Tips for designing effective animated maps’, Cartographic Perspectives, 44, pp. 63–65.
   Google Scholar
• Harrower M. (2009). ‘Cartographic animation’, in International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, ed. by , Kitchin R, Thrift N, pp. 408–413, Elsevier, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Harrower M, MacEachren A, Griffin AL. (2000). ‘Developing a geographic visualization tool to support earth science learning’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 27, pp. 279–293.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty M. (2004). ‘Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions’, Learning and Instruction, 14, pp. 343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty M, Kriz S, Cate C. (2003). ‘The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems’, Cognition and Instruction, 21, pp. 209–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koussoulakou A, Kraak MJ. (1992). ‘Spatia-temporal maps and cartographic communication’, The Cartographic Journal, 29, pp. 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren AM. (2004). How Maps Work: Representation, Visualization, and Design, 1st ed., The Guilford Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbø T. (2007). ‘Advanced Legends for Interactive Dynamic Maps’, in 23rd International Cartographic Conference, Theme 15. Oral 3-2. CDROM. , Aug 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbø T. (2001a). ‘Perception of Time Variables on Dynamic Maps’, in 20th International Cartographic Conference, Theme 12. CD-ROM. Beijing, Aug 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbø T. (2001b). ‘Visualization of the Temporal Dimension in Multimedia’, in 8th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science, Ås, Jun 25–27, 213–224.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbø T, Clarke KC, Fabrikant S. (2007). ‘Human Interaction with Animated Maps: The Portrayal of the Passage of Time’, in 11th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographical Information Science, Ås, Sep 5–7, pp. 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Midtbø T, Larsen E. (2005). ‘Map Animations Versus Static Maps – When is One of Them Better?’, in Joint ICA Commissions Seminar on Internet-based Cartographic Teaching and Learning, pp. 1–6, Madrid, Jul 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Monmonier M. (1990). ‘Strategies for the visualization of geographic time-series data’, Cartographica, 27, pp. 30–45.
   Google Scholar
• Monmonier M, Gluck M. (1994). ‘Focus groups for design improvement in dynamic cartography’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 21, pp. 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison JB. (2000). ‘Does animation facilitate learning? An evaluation of the congruence and equivalence hypotheses’, PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ogao P, Kraak M.-J. (2002). ‘Defining visualization operations for temporal cartographic animation design’, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 4, pp. 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Papliatseyeu A, Kotilainen N, Mayora O, Osmani V. (2009). ‘FINDR: low-cost indoor positioning using FM radio’, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, 12, pp. 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson MP. (1999). ‘Active legends for interactive cartographic animation’, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13, pp. 375–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price S. (2004). ‘Processing animation: integrating information from animated diagrams’, in Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, ed. by , Blackwell A, Marriott K, Shimojima A, pp. 127–138, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Rensink RA, O’Regan JK, Clark JJ. (1997). ‘To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes’, Psychological Science, 8, pp. 368–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieber L, Parmley M. (1995). ‘To teach or not to teach? Comparing the use of computer-based simulations in deductive versus inductive approaches to learning with adults in science’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, pp. 359–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slocum T, Sluter R, Kessler F, Yoder S. (2004). ‘A qualitative evaluation of MapTime, a program for exploring spatiotemporal point data’, Cartographica, 39, pp. 43–68.
   Google Scholar
• Slocum T, Yoder S, Kessler F, Sluter R. (2000). ‘MapTime: software for exploring spatiotemporal data associated with point locations’, Cartographica, 37, pp. 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Spence R. (2006). Information Visualization: Design for Interaction, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Tufte ER. (2001). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Tufte ER. (2006). Beautiful Evidence, Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky B, Morrison J, Betrancourt M. (2002). ‘Animation: can it facilitate?’, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 57, pp. 247–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasiliev I. (1997). ‘Mapping time’, Cartographica, 34, pp. 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ware C. (2004). Information Visualization: Perception for Design (Morgan Kaufmann Interactive Technologies Series), Morgan Kaufmann San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar