Mapping Literature: Visualisation of Spatial Uncertainty in Fiction

REFERENCES

• Auger A, Roy J. (2008). ‘Expression of Uncertainty in Linguistic Data’, in 11th International Conference on Information Fusion, Cologne, Jun 30–Jul 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bär HR, Hurni L. (2011). ‘Improved density estimation for the visualisation of literary spaces’, The Cartographic Journal, 48, 4, pp. 309–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner U. (1990). ‘Generalisierung topographischer Karten’, in Kartographisches Generalisieren, pp. 23–24, Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Kartographie, Bern.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett B. (2001). ‘What is a forest? On the vagueness of certain geographic concepts’, Topoi, 20, pp. 189–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertin J. (1983). Semiology of graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
   Google Scholar
• Bittner G, Stell JG. (2002). ‘Vagueness and rough location’, Geoinformatica, 6, pp. 99–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollmann J, Koch WG. (2002). Lexikon der Kartographie und Geomatik in zwei Bänden, Band 2 Karto bis Z, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg/Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury M. (1996). The Atlas of Literature (Introduction: unpaged), de Agostini, London.
   Google Scholar
• Clementini E. (2008). ‘Objects with broad boundaries’, in Encyclopedia of GIS, ed. by , Shekhar S, Xiong H, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 793–799.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper D, Gregory IN. (2011). ‘Mapping the English Lake District: a literary GIS’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, pp. 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring J. (2009). ‘Zur Geschichte der Literaturkarte (1907–2008)’, in Mediengeographie. Theorie – Analyse – Diskussion, ed. by , Döring J, Thielmann T, pp. 247–290, transcript Verlag, Bielefeld.
   Google Scholar
• Egenhofer MJ, Mark DM. (1995). ‘Naive geography’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 988, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Erwig M, Schneider M. (1997). ‘Vague regions‘, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1262, pp. 298–320.
   Google Scholar
• Evans AJ, Waters T. (2007). ‘Mapping vernacular geography: web-based GIS tools for capturing “fuzzy” or “vague” entities’, International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 7, pp. 134–150.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild MF. (2008). ‘Imprecision and spatial uncertainty’, in Encyclopedia of GIS, ed. by , Shekhar S, Xiong H, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 480–483.
   Google Scholar
• Heller E. (2005). Wie Farben wirken. Farbpsychologie – Farbsymbolik – Kreative Farbgestaltung, pp. 23–24, 56, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbeck bei Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Hurni L. (1999). ‘Digitalisierung und Virtualisierung der Landschaft’, in Vermessene Landschaften – Zur Kulturgeschichte einer technischen Praxis, ed. by , Gugerli D, pp. 65–78, Chronos, Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Hurni L. (2008). ‘Multimedia atlas information system’, in Encyclopedia of GIS, ed. by , Shekhar S, Xiong H, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 759–763.
   Google Scholar
• Hurni L, Sell G. (2010). ‘Cartography and architecture: interplay between reality and fiction’, The Cartographic Journal, 46, pp. 323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhof E. (2007). Cartographic Relief Presentation (1st edition in English, 1982), ESRI Press, Redlands, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser W. (1960). Das literarische Kunstwerk (1st edition, 1948), p. 352, Bern, Francke.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren AM. (1992). ‘Visualizing uncertain information’, Cartographic Perspectives, 13, pp. 10–19.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren AM, Robinson A, Hopper S, Gardner S, Murray R, Gahegan M, Hetzler E. (2005). ‘Visualizing geospatial information uncertainty: what we know and what we need to know’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32, pp. 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Montello DR, Goodchild MF, Gottsegen J, Fohl P. (2003). ‘Where’s downtown?: behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries’, Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3, pp. 50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti F. (1998). Atlas of the European Novel 1800–1900, p. 7, London, Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Pang AT, Wittenbrink C, Lodha S. (1997). ‘Approaches to uncertainty visualization’, The Visual Computer, 13, pp. 370–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang AT. (2001). ‘Visualizing Uncertainty in Geo-spatial Data’, in Workshop in the Intersections between Geospatial Information and Information Technology, Arlington, VA, Oct 1–2, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Piatti B. (2008). Die Geographie der Literatur. Schauplätze, Handlungsräume, Raumphantasien, Wallstein, Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Piatti B. (2009): ‘Literary Geography – or How Cartographers Open up a New Dimension for Literary Studies’, in 24th International Cartographic Conference, CD-ROM, Santiago, Nov 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Piatti B, Reuschel AK, Bär HR, Cartwright W, Hurni L. (2009). ‘Mapping literature towards a geography of fiction’, in Cartography and Art, ed. by , Cartwright W, Gartner G, Lehn A, pp. 177–192, Springer, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Reuschel AK, Piatti B, Hurni L. (2009). ‘Mapping Literature. The Prototype of “A Literary Atlas of Europe”’, in 24th International Cartographic Conference, CD-ROM, Santiago, Nov 15–21, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Salvisberg A. (2010). Historischer Atlas der Region Basel. Geschichte der Grenzen, pp. 81–87, Christoph Merian Verlag, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer K. (2002). Farbsysteme in Kunst und Wissenschaft, DuMont Literatur und Kunst Verlag, Köln.
   Google Scholar
• Trau J, Hurni L. (2007). ‘Possibilities of incorporationg and visualizing uncertainty in natural hazard prediction’, in 23rd International Cartographic Conference, Moscow, Aug 4–10, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Blok CA, Tang X. (2008). ‘Animated Representation of Uncertainty and Fuzziness in Dutch Spatial Planning Maps’, in XXIst ISPRS Congress, Beijing, July 3–11, pp. 1043–1048.
   Google Scholar
• Zipfel F. (2001). Fiktion, Fiktivität, Fiktionalität. Analysen zur Fiktion in der Literatur und zum Fiktionsbegriff in der Literaturwissenschaft, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar