Exploring Eye Movement Patterns on Cartographic Animations Using Projections of a Space-Time-Cube

REFERENCES

• Anselin L, Syabri I and Smirnov O. (2002). ‘Visualizing multivariate spatial correlation with dynamically linked windows’, in New Tools for Spatial Data Analysis: Proceedings of the Specialist Meeting, ed. by Anselin L and Rey S pp5–22, CSISS, Santa-Barbara, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Brodersen L, Andersen HHK and Weber S. (2002). Applying Eye-Movement Tracking for the Study of Map Perception and Map Design, Kort & Matrikelstyrelsen, København.
   Google Scholar
• Buscher G, Dumais ST and Cutrell E. (2010). ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Random: An Eye-Tracking Study of Ad Quality in Web Search’, in 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 42–49, Boston, CA, Jul 19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Buswell GT. (1935). How People Look at Pictures, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Chandon P, Hutchinson JW, Bradlow ET and Young SH. (2009). ‘Does in-store marketing work? Effects of the number and position of shelf facings on brand attention and evaluation at the point of purchase’, Journal of Marketing, 73, pp. 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandon P, Hutchinson WJ and Young SH. (2001). Measuring the value of point-of-purchase marketing with commercial eye-tracking data. INSEAD Business School Research Paper No. 2007/22/MKT/ACGRD. http://ssrn.com/abstract = 1032162 or http://dx.doi.org/10·2139/ssrn.1032162
   Google Scholar
• Dias E, Edwardes A and Purves R. (2007). ‘Analysing and Aggregating Visitor Tracks in a Protected Area’, in 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality, pp. 15–16, Enschede, Jun 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Djamasbi S, Siegel M and Tullis T. (2010). ‘Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking’, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 68, pp. 307–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski A. (2007). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice, Springer, London.
   Google Scholar
• Ekpenyong F, Palmer-Brown D and Brimicombe A. (2009). ‘Extracting road information from recorded GPS data using snap-drift neural network’, Neurocomputing, 73, pp. 24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrikant S and Goldsberry K. (2005). ‘Thematic relevance and perceptual salience of dynamic geovisualization displays’, in 22nd ICA International Cartographic Conference: Mapping Approaches into a Changing World, A Coruna, Spain, Jul 9–16. http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2005/htm/pdf/oral/TEMA15/Session%203/SARA%20IRINA%20FABRIKANT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fabrikant S, Hespanha SR and Hegarty M. (2009). ‘Cognitively inspired and perceptually salient graphic displays for efficient spatial inference making’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100, pp. 13–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrikant SI, Rebich-Hespanha S, Andrienko N, Andrienko G, Montello DR and Irina Fabrikant S. (2008). ‘Novel method to measure inference affordance in static small-multiple map displays representing dynamic processes’, The Cartographic Journal, 45, pp. 201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friendly M. (2002). ‘Visions and re-visions of Charles Joseph Minard’, Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, pp. 31–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahegan M, Takatsuka M, Wheeler M and Hardisty F. (2002). ‘GeoVISTA Studio: a geocomputational workbench’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26, pp. 267–292.
   Google Scholar
• Gams E, Rehrl K and Kaschl D. (2009). ‘Using Other People’s Trails for Navigation Assistance’, in 5th Geographic Information Days, Münster, pp 25–41 Sep 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Garlandini S and Fabrikant S. (2009). ‘Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of visual variables for geographic information visualization’, in Spatial Information Theory: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Spatial information Theory, pp. 195–211, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Gitelman DR. (2002). ‘ILAB: a program for post experimental eye movement analysis’, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, p. 605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg J. (1999). ‘Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs’, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24, pp. 631–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg J and Kotval X. (1998). ‘Eye movement-based evaluation of the computer interface’, in Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety, ed. by Kumar S, pp. 529–532, IOS Press, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin AL, MacEachren AM, Hardisty F, Steiner E and Li B. (2006). ‘A Comparison of animated maps with static small-multiple maps for visually identifying space–time clusters’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, pp. 740–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardisty F. (2009). ‘GeoJabber: enabling geo-collaborative visual analysis’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 36, pp. 267–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty M, Canham MS and Fabrikant SI. (2010). ‘Thinking about the weather: how display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, pp. 37–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägerstrand T. (1970). ‘What about people in Regional Science?’, Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24, pp. 6–21.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen SA, San Agustin J, Skovsgaard H, Hansen JP and Tall M. (2011). ‘Low cost vs. high-end eye tracking for usability testing’, in CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1177–1182, ACM Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Just MA and Carpenter PA. (1976). ‘Eye fixations and cognitive processes’, Cognitive Psychology, 8, pp. 441–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keehner M, Hegarty M, Cohen C, Khooshabeh P and Montello D. (2008). ‘Spatial reasoning with external visualizations: what matters is what you see, not whether you interact’, Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, pp. 1099–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolers PA, Duchnicky RL and Ferguson DC. (1981). ‘Eye movement measurement of readability of CRT displays’, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 23, pp. 517–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan MP and Lee J. (2004). ‘Geovisualization of human activity patterns using 3D GIS: a time-geographic approach’, in Spatially Integrated Social Science, ed. by Goodchild M F and Janelle D G, pp. 48–66, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Çöltekin A and Kraak M.-J. (2010). ‘Visual exploration of eye movement data using the space-time-cube’, Geographic Information Science, 6292, pp. 295–309.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren AMAM and Kraak M.-JMJ. (2001). ‘Research challenges in geovisualization’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28, pp. 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• MacEachren AM and Kraak MJ. (1997). ‘Exploratory cartographic visualization: advancing the agenda’, Computers & Geosciences, 23, pp. 335–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackworth N. (1976). ‘Stimulus density limits the useful field of view’, in Eye Movements and Psychological Processes, ed. by Monty R A and Senders, pp. 307–321, Erlbaum, J. W. Hillsdale, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Nossum AS. (2010). ‘Semistatic Animations – Integrating Past, Present and Future in Map Animations’, in GIScience 2010, Zurich, Sep 14–17. http://docs.alexanno.net/files/Nossum_Semistatic_ShortPaper_crc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nossum AS. (2012). ‘Semistatic animations – integrating past, present and future in animations’, The Cartographic Journal, 49, pp. 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooms K, Andrienko G, Andrienko N, de Maeyer P and Fack V. (2012). ‘Analysing the spatial dimension of eye movement data using a visual analytic approach’, Expert Systems with Applications, 39, pp. 1324–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opach T and Nossum AS. (2011). ‘Evaluating the Usability of Cartographic Animations with Eye-Movement Analysis’, in 25th International Cartographic Conference, Paris, Jul 3–8. http://icaci.org/files/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2011/Oral%20Presentations%20PDF/A3-Visualisation%20efficiency/CO-005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ponsoda V, Scott D and Findlay JM. (1995). ‘A probability vector and transition matrix analysis of eye movements during visual search’, Acta Psychologica, 88, pp. 167–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole A and Ball LJ. (2005). ‘Eye tracking in human–computer interaction and usability research: current status and future prospects’, in Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, ed. by Ghaoui C, pp. 211–219, Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Sankoff D and Kruskal JB. (1983). Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison, Vol. 1, Addison-Wesley Publication, London.
   Google Scholar
• Scinto LFM and Barnette BD. (1986). ‘An algorithm for determining clusters, pairs or singletons in eye-movement scan-path records’, Behavior Research Methods, 18, pp. 41–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright DJ, O’Dea E, Cushing JB, Cuny JE and Toomey DR. (2003). ‘Why Web GIS may not be enough: a case study with the virtual research vessel’, Marine Geodesy, 26, pp. 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J and Fu H. (2001). ‘Application of GIS in the study of the migration of the population gravity center’, Engineering of Surveying and Mapping, 10, pp. 48–51.
   Google Scholar