Effects of Cartographic Elevation Visualizations and Map-reading Tasks on Eye Movements

REFERENCES

• Antes JR, Chang K and Mullis C. (1985). ‘The visual effect of map design: An eye-movement analysis’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 12, pp. 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley RJ and Tatler BW. (2006). ‘High frequency edges (but not contrast) predict where we fixate: A bayesian system identification analysis’, Vision Research, 46, pp. 2824–2833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bex PJ and Makous W. (2002). ‘Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images’, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 19, pp. 1096–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Board C. (1978). ‘Map reading tasks appropriate in experimental studies in cartographic communication’, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 15, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Board C and Taylor RM. (1977). ‘Perception and maps: Human factors in map design and interpretation’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 2, pp. 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunyé TT and Taylor HA. (2009). ‘When goals constrain: Eye movements and memory for goal-oriented map study’, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, pp. 772–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caduff D and Timpf S. (2008). ‘On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation’, Cognitive Processing, 9, pp. 249–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell FW and Robson JG. (1968). ‘Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings’. The Journal of Physiology, 197, pp. 551–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang K.-T, Antes J and Lenzen T. (1985). ‘The Effect of Experience on Reading Topographic Relief Information: Analyses of Performance and Eye Movements’, The Cartographic Journal, 22, pp. 88–94.
   Google Scholar
• Delplanque S, N’diaye K, Scherer K and Grandjean D. (2007). ‘Spatial frequencies or emotional effects? A systematic measure of spatial frequencies for IAPS pictures by a discrete wavelet analysis’, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 165, pp. 144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson MW. (1977). ‘Eye movement parameters and map reading’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 4, pp. 39–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gärling T. (1999). ‘Human information processing in sequential spatial choice’, in Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes, ed. by Golledge G., pp. 81–98. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• Geisler WS and Cormack L. (2011). ‘Models of overt attention’, in Oxford handbook of eye movements, ed. by Liversedge S P, Gilchirst I D and Everling S, pp. 439–454, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Gell A. (1985). ‘How to read a map: Remarks on the practical logic of navigation’, Man, pp. 271–286.
   Google Scholar
• Gilchrist ID. (2011). ‘Saccades’, in Oxford handbook of eye movements, ed. by Liversedge S P, Gilchirst I D and Everling S, pp. 85–94, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Graef P. (2007). ‘Transsaccadic recognition in scene exploration’, in Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, ed. by van Gompel R P G, Fischer M H, Murray W S and Hill R L, pp. 165–192, Elsevier, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin TLC and Lock BF. (1979). ‘The Perceptual Problem in Contour Interpretation’, The Cartographic Journal, 16, pp. 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Groner MT, Groner R and Mühlenen A. (2008). ‘The effect of spatial frequency content on parameters of eye movements’, Psychological Research, 72, pp. 601–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty M, Smallman HS and Stull AT. (2012). ‘Choosing and using geospatial displays: Effects of design on performance and metacognition’, Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 18, pp. 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty M, Smallman HS, Stull AT and Canham MS. (2009). ‘Naïve cartography: How intuitions about display configuration can hurt performance’, Cartographica, 44, pp. 171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson JM. (2003). ‘Human gaze control during real-world scene perception’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, pp. 498–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson JM and Hollingworth A. (1999). ‘High-level scene perception’, Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson JM, Brockmole JR, Castelhano MS and Mack M. (2007). ‘Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes’, in Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, ed. by van Gompel R P G, Fischer M H, Murray W S and Hill R L, pp. 537–562, Elsevier, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hirtle S, Timpf S and Tenbrink T. (2011). ‘The effect of activity on relevance and granularity for navigation’, in Spatial information theory, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6899, ed. by Egenhofer, M., Giudice, N., Moratz, R. and Worboys, M., pp. 73–89, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist K, Nyström M, Andersson R, Dewhurst R, Jarodzka H and van de Weijer J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hooge ITH, Vlaskamp BNS and Over EAB. (2007). ‘Saccadic search: On the duration of a fixation’, in Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, ed. by van Gompel R P G, Fischer M H, Murray W S and Hill R L, pp. 581–596, Elsevier, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Itti L. (2000). ‘A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention’, Vision Research, 40, pp. 1489–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti L, and Koch C. (2001). ‘Computational modelling of visual attention’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, pp. 194–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettunen P, Irvankoski K, Krause CM, Sarjakoski T and Sarjakoski LT. (2013). ‘Geospatial images in the acquisition of spatial knowledge for wayfinding’, Journal of Spatial Information Science, 5, pp. 75–106.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen P, Sarjakoski T, Sarjakoski LT and Oksanen J. (2009). ‘Cartographic Portrayal of Terrain in Oblique Parallel Projection’, in Proceedings of the 24th International Cartographic Conference, Santiago, Nov 15–21. http://icaci.org/documents/ICC_proceedings/ICC2009/html/refer/20_10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lobben AK. (2004). ‘Tasks, strategies and cognitive processes associated with navigational map reading: A review perspective’, Professional Geographer, 56, pp. 270–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller GA. (1956). ‘The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information’, Psychological Review, 63, pp. 81–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills M, Hollingworth A, Van der Stigchel S, Hoffman L and Dodd MD. (2011). ‘Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations’, Journal of Vision, 11, pp. 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello DR, Sullivan CN and Pick HL Jr. (1994). ‘Recall memory for topographic maps and natural terrain: Effects of experience and task performance’, Cartographica, 31, pp. 18–36.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison JL. (1978). ‘Towards a functional definition of the science of cartography with emphasis on map reading’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 5, pp. 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Nivala AM, Sarjakoski LT, Laakso K, Itäranta J and Kettunen P. (2009). ‘User requirements for location-based services to support hiking activities’, in Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography: Location based services and telecartography II. From sensor fusion to context models, ed. by Gartner G and Rehrl K, pp. 167–184, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Näsänen R, Ojanpää H and Kojo I. (2001). ‘Effect of stimulus contrast on performance and eye movements in visual search’, Vision Research, 41, pp. 1817–1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Schwarzbach F, Tiina Sarjakoski L and Sarjakoski T. (2011). ‘Map design for a multi-publishing framework-case menomaps in Nuuksio national park’, The Cartographic Journal, 48, pp. 116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhurst DJ and Niebur E. (2004). ‘Texture contrast attracts overt visual attention in natural scenes’, European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, pp. 783–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips RJ. (1979). ‘An Experiment with Contour Lines’, The Cartographic Journal, 16, pp. 72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips RJ, Lucia A and Skelton N. (1975). ‘Some Objective Tests of the Legibility of Relief Maps’, The Cartographic Journal, 12, pp. 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Porwik P and Lisowska A. (2004). ‘The Haar-wavelet transform in digital image processing: its status and achievements’, Machine Graphics and Vision, 13, pp. 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Potash LM, Farrell JP and Jeffrey TS. (1978). ‘A Technique for Assessing Map Relief Legibility’, The Cartographic Journal, 15, pp. 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Core Team R (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rajashekar U, Van der linde I, Bovik AC and Cormack LK. (2006). ‘Foveated analysis and selection of visual fixations in natural scenes’, in Image processing, 2006 IEEE International Conference, pp. 453–456, Mumbai, India, Dec 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner K. (2009). ‘Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, pp. 1457–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Elahipanah A and Reingold EM. (2007). ‘Effects of context and instruction on the guidance of eye movements during a conjunctive visual search task’, in Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, ed. by van Gompel R G P, Fischer M H, Murray W S and Hill R L, pp. 75–95, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrows M and Hirtle S. (1999). ‘The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces’, in Spatial information theory, ed. by Freksa C, Brauer W, Habel C and Wender K F, pp. 37–50, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Tatler BW, Baddeley RJ, and Gilchrist ID. (2005). ‘Visual correlates of fixation selection: Effects of scale and time’, Vision Research, 45, pp. 643–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatler BW, Baddeley RJ, and Vincent BT. (2006). ‘The long and the short of it: Spatial statistics at fixation vary with saccade amplitude and task’, Vision Research, 46, pp. 1857–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli A, Linde IVD, Bovik C and Cormack K. (2009). ‘Eye movements selective for spatial frequency and orientation during active visual search’, Vision Research, 49, pp. 173–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HA. (2005). ‘Mapping the understanding of understanding maps’, in The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, ed. by Taylor H A. Shah P and Miyake A, pp. 295–333. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Theeuwes J. (2010). ‘Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection’, Acta Psychologica, 135, pp. 77–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood G, Foulsham T, van Loon E, Humphreys L and Bloyce J. (2006). ‘Eye movements during scene inspection: A test of the saliency map hypothesis’, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, pp. 321–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens CD and McCarley JS. (2008). Applied Attention Theory, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Wickens CD, Vincow M and Yeh M. (2005). ‘Design applications of visuospatial thinking: The importance of frame of reference’, in The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, ed. by Taylor H A, Shah P and Miyake A, pp. 383–425, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham H. (2009). Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis, Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkening J and Fabrikant S. (2011). ‘How do decision time and realism affect map-based decision making?’, in Spatial Information Theory, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6899, ed. by Egenhofer, M., Giudice, N., Moratz, R. and Worboys, M., pp. 1–19, Springer, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Zelinsky GJ. (2008). ‘A theory of eye movements during target acquisition’, Psychological Review, 115, pp. 787–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar