The inventory of bryophytes at sites: completeness and survey effort

References

• Alexander M. , 2010, A guide to management planning. Talgarth: CMS Consortium. [accessed July 2011]. Available at: <http://www.esdm.co.uk/cms>.
   Google Scholar
• Aranda SC, Gabriel R, Borges PAV, Lobo JM. Assessing the completeness of bryophytes inventories: an oceanic island as a case study (Terceira, Azorean Archipelago). Biodiversity and Conservation, 2010, 19: 2469–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCT. , 2007, Bat surveys: good practice guidelines. London: The Bat Conservation Trust. [accessed July 2011]. Available at: <http://www.bats.org.uk/download_info.php>.
   Google Scholar
• Bebber DP, Marriott FHC, Gaston KJ, Harris SA, Scotland RW. Predicting unknown species numbers using discovery curves. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 2007, 274: 1651–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BHSP (Biological Heritage Sites Partnership). Biological heritage sites: guidelines for site selection., 1998, Preston: Lancashire County Council.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs J, Fox G, Nicolet P, Walker D, Whitfield M, Williams P. 1998, A guide to the methods of the national pond survey. Oxford: Pond Action. [accessed July 2011]. Available at: <http://www.pondconservation.org.uk/Data/surveymethods/NPS>.
   Google Scholar
• Cantarello E, Green R, Westerhoff D. The condition of the new forest habitats: an overview. In: A.C. Newton, ed. Biodiversity in the new forest, 2010, Newbury: Pisces Publications, 124–31.
   Google Scholar
• DEFRA. Local sites: guidance on their identification, selection and management, 2006, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. [accessed July 2011].: Available at: <http://archive.defra.gov.uk/rural/protected/localsites.htm>.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Francés E, Soberón J. Statistical estimation and model selection of species-accumulation functions. Conservation Biology, 2005, 19: 569–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• During HJ. Life strategies of bryophytes: a preliminary review. Lindbergia, 1979, 5: 2–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• During HJ. Ecological classification of bryophytes and lichens. In: J.W. Bates & A.M. Farmer, eds. Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment, OxfordClarendon Press1992, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Eken G, Bennun L, Brooks TM, Darwall W, Fishpool LDC, Foster M, Knox D, Langhammer P, Matiku P, Radford E, Salaman P, Sechrest W, Smith ML, Spector S, Tordoff A. Key biodiversity areas as site conservation targets. BioScience, 2004, 54: 1110–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick MC, Preisser EL, Ellison AM, Elkinton JS. Observer bias and the detection of low-density populations. Ecological Applications, 2009, 19: 167–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gaston KJ. Rarity, 1994, LondonChapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gaston KJ. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges, 2003, OxfordOxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert G, Gibbons DW, Evans J. Bird monitoring methods, 1998, SandyThe Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.
   Google Scholar
• Goff FG, Dawson GA, Rochow JJ. Site examination for threatened and endangered plant species. Environmental Management, 1982, 6: 307–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO, Blackstock TH, Long DG, Rothero GP. A checklist and census catalogue of British and Irish bryophytes., 2008, CardiffThe British Bryological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgetts NG. Guidelines for the selection of biological SSSIs: non-vascular plants, 1992, Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee. [accessed July 2011]. Available at: <http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-2303>.
   Google Scholar
• Huebner CD: Detection and monitoring of invasive exotic plants: a comparison of four sampling methods. Northeastern Naturalist, 2007, 14: 183–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEM. Guidelines for ecological impact assessment, 2006, WinchesterThe Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management. [accessed July 2011].. Available at: <http://www.ieem.net/ecia>
   Google Scholar
• JNCC. Common standards monitoring guidance for bryophytes and lichens, 2005, Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee. [accessed July 2011]. Available at: <http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-2231>.
   Google Scholar
• Lotz A, Allen CR. Observer bias in anuran call surveys. Journal of Wildlife Management, 2007, 71: 675–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren MA, Cadman MD. Can novice volunteers provide credible data for bird surveys requiring song identifications? Journal of Field Ornithology, 1999, 70: 481–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson AT, Slade NA. Extrapolating inventory results into biodiversity estimates and the importance of stopping rules. Diversity and Distributions, 1998, 4: 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe DA. Guidelines for selection of biological SSSIs, 1989, Peterborough: The Nature Conservancy Council. [accessed July 2011]. Available at: <http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-2303>.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing, 2011, Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [accessed July 2011]. Available at: <http://www.r-project.org>.
   Google Scholar
• Rothero G, Dobson D, Fasham M. , 2005, Bryophytes. In: D. Hill, M. Fasham, G. Tucker, M. Shewry & P. Shaw, eds. Handbook of biodiversity methods: survey, evaluation and monitoring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 288–94..
   Google Scholar
• Soberón J, Llorente J. The use of species accumulation functions for the prediction of species richness. Conservation Biology, 1993, 7: 180–8.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer JW, Kirby KJ. An inventory of ancient woodland for England and Wales. Biological Conservation, 1992, 62: 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS, Dolman PM, Knight TM. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2004, 19: 305–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson DM. The ‘standardized search’: an improved way to conduct bird surveys. Austral Ecology, 2003, 28: 515–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson DM. Comparative evaluation of new approaches to survey birds. Wildlife Research, 2004, 31: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson DM. Optimizing inventories of diverse sites: insights from Barro Colorado Island birds. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2010, 1: 280–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Jackman S. , 2007, Regression models for count data in R. Research Report Series (Department of Statistics and Mathematics) 53. Vienna: Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration. [accessed July 2011]. Available at: <http://epub.wu.ac.at/1168>.
   Google Scholar