Forsstroemia Lindb. (Neckeraceae) revisited

References

• Borsch T, Quandt D. 2009. Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of non-coding plastid DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 282: 169–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherus VF. 1929. Musci. In: , Handel-Mazzetti H, ed. Symbolae sinicae. Wien: Verlag von Julius Springer, Vol. IV, pp. 1–147, pls. I–V..
   Google Scholar
• Buck WR. 1980. Animadversions on Pterigynandrum with special commentary on Forsstroemia and Leptopterigynandrum Bryologist, 83: 451–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon HN. 1933. Mosses of Hong Kong with other Chinese mosses. Hong Kong Naturalist, Supplement, 2: 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Enroth J. 1994. Notes on the Neckeraceae (Musci). 20. Neckera goughiana and its geographic distribution. Hikobia, 11: 539–42.
   Google Scholar
• Enroth J, Ji M. 2006. Shevockia (Neckeraceae), a new moss genus with two species from Southeast Asia. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 100: 68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Goffinet B, Buck WR. 2004. Systematics of the Bryophyta (mosses): from molecules to a revised classification. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 98: 205–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L, Zare H. 2010. The Euxinian-Hyrcanian endemic species Forsstroemia remotifolia (Lindb. ex Broth.) Hedenäs and Zare, comb. nov. (Neckeraceae, Bryophyta). Nova Hedwigia Beiheft, 138: 61–7.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Miller RE, Ronquist F. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology, 51: 673–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17: 754–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science, 294: 2310–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttunen S, Ignatov MS. 2010. Evolution and taxonomy of aquatic species in the genus Rhynchostegium (Brachytheciaceae, Bryophyta). Taxon, 59: 791–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchner SA. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 87: 482–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg SO. 1863. Om ett nytt slägte, Epipterygium, bland bladmossorna. Öfversigt af Kongliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar, 19: 599–609.
   Google Scholar
• Manuel MG. 1974. A revised classification of the Leucodontaceae and a revision of the subfamily Alsioideae. Bryologist, 77: 531–50.
   Google Scholar
• Müller KF. 2005. SeqState — primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Applied Bioinformatics, 4: 65–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller KF. 2007. PRAP2 — likelihood and parsimony ratchet analysis, v.0·9. Available from: www.bioinf.web.
   Google Scholar
• Müller KF, Quandt D, Müller J, Neinhuis C. 2005. PhyDE® 0·995: phylogenetic data editor, Dresden. Available from: www.phyde.de.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon KC. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics, 15: 407–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi A. 1947. A review of the Leucodontineae and Neckerineae of Japan, Loo Choo and of Formosa, I. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 2: 27–79.
   Google Scholar
• Noguchi A. 1989. (supplemented by Z. Iwatsuki). Illustrated moss flora of Japan. Part 3. Nichinan: Hattori Botanical Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson S, Buchbender V, Enroth J, Hedenäs L, Huttunen S, Quandt D. 2009a. Phylogenetic analyses reveal high levels of polyphyly among pleurocarpous lineages as well as novel clades. Bryologist, 112: 447–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson S, Buchbender V, Enroth J, Hedenäs L, Huttunen S, Quandt D. 2010. Phylogenetic relationships in the ‘Pinnatella’ clade of the moss family Neckeraceae (Bryophyta). Organisms, Diversity and Evolution, 10: 107–22.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson S, Buchbender V, Enroth J, Huttunen S, Hedenäs L, Quandt D. 2009b. Evolution of the Neckeraceae: resolving the backbone phylogeny. Systematics and Biodiversity, 7: 419–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson S, Enroth J, Buchbender V, Hedenäs L, Huttunen S, Quandt D. 2011. Neckera and Thamnobryum (Neckeraceae, Bryopsida) — paraphyletic assemblages. Taxon, 60: 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson S, Rumsey F, Grundmann M, Russel S, Enroth J, Quandt D. 2009c. Convergent evolution of British and Macaronesian endemic Thamnobryums (Neckeraceae). Journal of Bryology, 31: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quandt D, Huttunen S, Tangney R, Stech M. 2009. Back to the future? Molecules take us back to the 1925 classification of the Lembophyllaceae (Bryopsida). Systematic Botany, 34: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Quandt D, Müller KF, Huttunen S. 2003. Characterisation of the chloroplast DNA psbT-H region and the influence of dyad symmetrical elements on phylogenetic reconstructions. Plant Biology, 5: 400–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quandt D, Stech M. 2004. Molecular evolution of the trnTUGU-trnFGAA region in Bryophytes. Plant Biology, 6: 545–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2007. Tracer v1·4. Available from: http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw JA, Allen B. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships, morphological incongruence, and geographic speciation in the Fontinalaceae (Bryophyta). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 16: 225–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology, 49: 369–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotiaux A, Enroth J, Olsson S, Quandt D, Vanderpoorten A. 2009. When morphology and molecules tell us different stories: a case-in-point with Leptodon corsicus, a new and unique endemic moss species from Corsica. Journal of Bryology, 31: 186–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark LR. 1987. A taxonomic monograph of Forsstroemia Lindb. (Bryopsida: Leptodontaceae). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 63: 133–218.
   Google Scholar
• Stöver BC, Müller KF. 2010. TreeGraph 2: combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. BMC Bioinformatics, 11: 7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tsubota H, De Luna E, Gonzales D, Ignatov M, Deguchi H. 2004. Molecular phylogenetics and ordinal relationships based on analyses of a large-scale data set of 600 rbcL sequences of mosses. Hikobia, 14: 149–70.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderpoorten A, Jacquemart AL. 2004. Evolutionary mode, tempo, and phylogenetic association of continuous morphological traits in the aquatic moss genus Amblystegium. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17: 279–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, He S. 2011. Pterobryaceae. In: , Wu P-C, Crosby MR, eds. Moss flora of China, English version. Vol. 5. Erpodiaceae–Climaciaceae. Beijing & New York: Science Press & St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press, pp. 215–257.
   Google Scholar