References
- Arnold EN. 1994. Investigating the origins of performance advantage: adaptation, exaption and lineage effects. In: , Eggleton P, Vane-Wright R, eds. Phylogenetics and ecology. London: Academic Press, pp. 123–68.
- Bell N, Quandt D, O’Brien TJ, Newton AE. 2007. Taxonomy and phylogeny in the earliest diverging pleurocarps: square holes and bifurcating pegs. Bryologist, 110: 533–60.
- Buck WR. 1991. The basis for familial classification of pleurocarpous mosses. Advances in Bryology, 4: 169–85.
- Coddington JA. 1994. The roles of homology and convergence in studies of adaptation. In: , Eggleton P, Vane-Wright R, eds.Phylogenetics and ecology. London: Academic Press, pp. 53–78.
- Eggleton P, Vane-Wright R. (eds.). 1994. Phylogenetics and ecology. London:Academic Press .
- Frey W, Stech M. 2009. Division of bryophyta Schimp. (Musci, Mosses). In: , Frey W, ed. Syllabus of plant families. Adolf Engler’s Syllabus Der Pflanzenfamilien, 13th edition. Part 3. Bryophytes and seedless vascular plants. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger, pp. 116–257.
- Harvey PH, Pagel MD. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hedenäs L. 1994. The basal pleurocarpous diplolepidous mosses — a cladistic approach. Bryologist, 97: 225–43.
- Hedenäs L. 1999. How important is phylogenetic history in explaining character states in pleurocarpous mosses? Canadian Journal of Botany, 77: 1723–43.
- Hedenäs L. 2001. Environmental factors potentially affecting character states in pleurocarpous mosses. Bryologist, 104: 72–91.
- Hedenäs L. 2002. Important complexes of intercorrelated character states in pleurocarpous mosses. Lindbergia, 27: 104–21.
- Hedenäs L. 2007. Morphological characters and their use in pleurocarpous moss systematics. Systematics Association Special Volume, 71: 221–39.
- Ho BC. 2010. Evolution and diversification of the Hookeriales (Bryopsida) with emphasis on Distichophyllum (Daltoniaceae) and its allied genera. PhD thesis, Rheinischen-Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn.
- Huttunen S, Hedenäs L, Ignatov MS, Devos N, Vanderpoorten A. 2008. Origin and evolution of the northern hemisphere disjunction in the moss genus Homalothecium (Brachytheciaceae). American Journal of Botany, 95: 720–30.
- Huttunen S, Ignatov MS, Müller K, Quandt D. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae and Lembophyllaceae. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 98: 328–61.
- Losos JB. 2008. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecology Letters, 11: 995–1007.
- Olsson S, Buchbender V, Enroth J, Huttunen S, Hedenäs L, Quandt D. 2009a. Evolution of the Neckeraceae (Bryophyta): resolving the backbone phylogeny. Systematics and Biodiversity, 7: 419–32.
- Olsson S, Rumsey F, Grundmann M, Russel S, Enroth J, Quandt D. 2009b. The origin of the British and Macaronesian endemic Thamnobryum species (Neckeraceae). Journal of Bryology, 31: 1–10.
- Pedersen N, Newton AE. 2007. Phylogenetic and morphological studies within the Ptychomniales, with emphasis on the evolution of dwarf males. In: , Newton AE, Tangney RS, eds. Pleurocarpous mosses: systematics and evolution. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 367–92.
- Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1989. Statistical methods. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
- StatSoft Inc. 2008. Statistica (Data analysis software system), Version 8.0. Available at: <www.Statsoft.Com>.
- Vanderpoorten A, Hedenäs L, Cox C, Shaw AJ. 2002. Phylogeny and morphological evolution of the Amblystegiaceae (Bryopsida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 23: 1–21.
- Vanderpoorten A, Jacquemart A-L. 2004. Evolutionary mode, tempo, and phylogenetic association of continuous morphological traits in the aquatic moss genus Amblystegium. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17: 279–87.
- Vilhelmsen L, Turrisi GF. 2011. Per Arborem Ad Astra: morphological adaptations to exploiting the woody habitat in the early evolution of Hymenoptera. Arthropod Structure & Development, 40: 2–20.