Molecular, morphological, and ecological differences between the terrestrial and aquatic forms of Oxyrrhynchium speciosum (Brid.) Warnst. (Brachytheciaceae)

References

• APHA, (American Public Health Association). 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Banaś, K. 2002. Impact of humic substances on Sphagnum denticulatum habitats. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 71(1): 63–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, JW. 1995. A bryophyte flora of Berkshire. Journal of Bryology. 18(3): 503–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, E. 1911. Musci Europaei Exsiccati. Die laubmoose Europas unter mitwirkung namhafter bryologen und floristen Abbreviation, 16: 751–800.
   Google Scholar
• Beever, JE., Fife, AJ. & West, CJ. 1996. Mosses of the Kermadec Islands, northern New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 34: 463–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E., Bobbink, R. & Roelofs, JGM. 2002. Restoration of aquatic macrophyte vegetation in acidified and eutrophied softwater lakes: an overview. Aquatic Botany, 73: 405–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling, PM., Freedman, B., Stewart, C., Kerekes, JJ. & Lefkovitch, LP. 1986. Aquatic plants of acid lakes in Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia; floristic composition and relation to water chemistry. Canadian Journal of Botany, 64(4): 724–9.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, PA. & Kalff, J. 1985. Depth distribution and biomass of submersed aquatic macrophyte communities in relation to Secchi depth. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42: 701–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogoni, A., Scrugli, A. & Cortis, P. 2009. Bryophyte flora of some temporary pools in Sardinia and Corsica. Bryophyte Diversity & Conservation, 143, Supplement: 97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Dąmbska, I. 1966. Zbiorowiska ramienic Polski [Communities of Characeae in the area of Poland]. Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk, Wydział Matematyczno-Przyrodniczy, Prace Komisji Biologicznej, 31: 1–75 (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• De Winton, MD. & Beever, JE. 2004. Deep-water bryophyte records from New Zealand lakes. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 38(2): 329–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond, AJ., Ashton, B., Buxton, S., Cheung, M., Cooper, A., Duran, C., Field, M., Heled, J., Kearse, M., Markowitz, S., Moir, R., Stones-Havas, S., Sturrock, S., Thierer, T. & Wilson, A. 2011. Geneious, v5·4.; Available from http://www.geneious.com/ (Accessed 2012 March 23).
   Google Scholar
• Edgar, RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Research, 32: 1792–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, R. 1991. Index to bryophyte chromosome counts. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca, 40: 1–352.
   Google Scholar
• Gąbka, M. 2009. Charophytes of the Wielkopolska region (NW Poland): distribution, taxonomy and autecology. Poznań: Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
   Google Scholar
• Galbraith, DW., Harkins, KR. & Maddox, JM. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science, 220(4601): 1049–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glime, JM. & Vitt, DH., 1984. The physiological adaptations of aquatic Musci. Lindbergia, 10: 41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradstein, SR. & Smittenberg, JH. 1977. The hydrophilous vegetation of Western Crete. Vegetatio, 34: 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, TA., 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium, Ser. 41: 95–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, MO., Preston, CD. & Smith, AJE. eds 1994. Atlas of the bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Volume 3: Mosses (Diplolepideae). Colchester: Harley Books, p348.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, JP. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17(8): 754–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttunen, S. & Ignatov, MS. 2010. Evolution and taxonomy of aquatic species in the genus Rhynchostegium (Brachytheciaceae, Bryophyta). Taxon, 59(3): 791–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignatov, MS. & Kurbatova, NB. 1990. A review of deep water bryophytes with new records from USSR. Hikobia, 10: 393–401.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatov, MS. & Huttunen, S. 2002. Brachytheciaceae (Bryophyta) – a family of sibling genera. Arctoa, 11: 245–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kanda, H. & Ohtani, S. 1991. Morphology of the aquatic mosses collected in Lake Yukidori, Langhovde, Antarctica. Proceedings of the NIPR Symposium on Polar Biology, 4(1): 14–122.
   Google Scholar
• Kerekes, J. & Freedman, B. 1989. Characteristics of three acidic lakes in Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia, Canada. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 18: 183–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, SV. 1981. The identity of a gathering of Eurhynchium speciosum (Brid.) Jur. from Turkey. Journal of Bryology, 11: 563–5.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, SV. 1982. Chromosome evolution in the Brachytheciaceae. Journal of Bryology, 12: 233–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middelboe, AL. & Markager, S. 1997. Depth limits and minimum light requirements of freshwater macrophytes. Freshwater Biology, 37(3): 553–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mönkemeyer, W. 1927. Die laubmoose Europas. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, KJ. 2002. Plant communities and plant diversity in softwater lakes of northern Europe. Aquatic Botany, 73(4): 287–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyholm, E. 1965. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. II. Musci. 5: 407–647. Lund: Swedish Natural Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Priddle, J. 1979. Morphology and adaptation of aquatic mosses in an Antarctic lake. Journal of Bryology, 10: 517–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozen, S. & Skaletsky, H. 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods in Molecular Biology. 132: Research council 132: 65–86.
   Google Scholar
• Rusińska, A., Górski, P., Gąbka, M., Stebel, A., Fudali, E., Szczepański, M., Rosadziński, S., Wolski, G., Pisarek, W., Zubel, R., Staniaszek-Kik, M., Pawlikowski, P., Wilhelm, M., Salachna, A. & Zalewska-Gałosz, J.2009 . Bryoflora of the spring fen ‘Makąty’ in north-western Wielkopolska Region. Botanika - Steciana, 13: 155–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sand-Jensen, K., Riis, T., Markager, S. & Vincent, WF. 1999. Slow growth and decomposition of mosses in Arctic lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56(3): 388–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, AJ. & Allen, B. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships, morphological incongruence, and geographic speciation in the Fontinalaceae (Bryophyta). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 16: 225–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, AJE. 1978. Moss Flora of Britain & Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spagnuolo, V., Caputo, P., Cozzolino, S., Castaldo, R. & De Luca, P. 1999. Patterns of relationship in Trichostomoideae (Pottiaceae, Musci). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 216: 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szmeja, J. 2010. Changes in the aquatic moss Sphagnum denticulatum Brid. population abundance in a softwater lake over period of three years. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 79(2): 167–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Braak, CJF. & Šmilauer, P. 1998. CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Wageningen, Netherlands: Centre for Biometry.
   Google Scholar
• Thuresson, M. 2008. Inventering av vattenväxter i tio sjöar 2008. Länsstyrelseni Stockholmslän. Rapport 2009. www.ab.lst.se/publikationer, (accessed 23 March 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Toivonen, H. & Huttunen, P. 1995. Aquatic macrophytes and ecological gradients in 57 small lakes in southern Finland. Aquatic Botany, 51(3): 197–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veljić, M., Ljubić, B., Marin, PD. & Marin, M. 2008. Bryophyte flora on the northern slopes of Zlatar Mountain (southwest Serbia). Archives of Biological Science Belgrade, 60(1): 145–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veljić, M., Marin, PD., Lakušić, D., & Ljubić B. 2006. Bryophyte flora of the Uvac River gorge (southwest Serbia). Archives of Biological Science Belgrade, 58 (3): 187–94.
   Google Scholar
• Vestergaard, O. & Sand-Jensen, K. 2000. Alkalinity and trophic state regulate aquatic plant distribution in Danish lakes. Aquatic Botany, 67: 85–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnstorf, C. 1899. Miscellenaus der Europäischen moosflora. Allgemeine botanische Zeitschrift für Systematik, Floristik, Pflanzengeographie, Beihefte 5: 28–43.
   Google Scholar
• White, TJ., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, M. Gelfand, D. Sninsky J. & White, T. eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 315–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wynns, J. 2006. Taxonomic studies in the aquatic moss genus Platyhypnidium (Brachytheciaceae). MSc thesis, Appalachian State University.
   Google Scholar
• Wynns, JT., Keith, JN., Murrell, ZE, McFarland, KD. & Buck, WR. 2009. Studies on aquatic Oxyrrhynchium (Brachytheciaceae), with an emphasis on O. pringlei n. comb. Bryologist, 112(4): 786–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zechmeister, HG., Tribsch, A. & Hohenwallner, D. 2002. Die moosflora von Linz und ihre bedeutungfür die bioindikation. Naturkundliches Jahrbuch der Stadt Linz, 48: 111–91.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Schwartz, S., Wagner, L. & Miller, W. 2000. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. Journal of Computational Biology, 7(1–2): 203–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar