Using heat treatment effects and EBSD analysis to tailor microstructure of hybrid Mg nanocomposite for enhanced overall mechanical response

References

• Gupta M and Sharon NML: ‘Magnesium, magnesium alloys, and magnesium composites’, 2011, Hoboken, NJ, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ye HZ and Liu XY: ‘Review of recent studies in magnesium matrix composites’, J. Mater. Sci., 2004, 39, (20), 6153–6171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieringa H: ‘Properties of magnesium alloys reinforced with nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes: a review’, J. Mater. Sci., 2011, 46, (2), 289–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kainer KU: ‘Metal matrix composites’; 2006, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd D: ‘Particle reinforced aluminium and magnesium matrix composites’, Int. Mater. Rev., 1994, 39, (1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purazrang K, Abachi P and Kainer K: ‘Investigation of the mechanical behaviour of magnesium composites’, Composites, 1994, 25, (4), 296–302.
   Google Scholar
• Jayalakshmi S, Kailas SV and Seshan S: ‘Tensile behaviour of squeeze cast AM100 magnesium alloy and its Al2O3 fibre reinforced composites’, Composites Part A, 2002, 33A, (8), 1135–1140.
   Google Scholar
• Chua B, Lu L and Lai M: ‘Influence of SiC particles on mechanical properties of Mg based composite’, Compos. Struct., 1999, 47, (1), 595–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Q, Li X and Wang H: ‘Fabrication of TiC particulate reinforced magnesium matrix composites’, Scr. Mater., 2003, 48, (6), 713–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun K, Jayaramanavar P, Nguyen Q, Chan J, Kwok R and Gupta M: ‘Investigation into tensile and compressive responses of Mg–ZnO composites’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2012, 28, (5), 582–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan S, Tan M and Gupta M: ‘Development of nano-ZrO2 reinforced magnesium nanocomposites with significantly improved ductility’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2007, 23, (11), 1309–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh C, Wei J, Lee L and Gupta M: ‘Ductility improvement and fatigue studies in Mg CNT nanocomposites’, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2008, 68, (6), 1432–1439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan S and Gupta M: ‘Effect of particulate size of Al2O3 reinforcement on microstructure and mechanical behavior of solidification processed elemental Mg’, J. Alloys Compd, 2006, 419, (1), 84–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma B, Wang H, Wang Y and Jiang Q: ‘Fabrication of (TiB2−TiC)p/AZ91 magnesium matrix hybrid composite’, J. Mater. Sci., 2005, 40, (17), 4501–4504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur SK, Srivatsan T and Gupta M: ‘Synthesis and mechanical behavior of carbon nanotube–magnesium composites hybridized with nanoparticles of alumina’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, A466, (1), 32–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibi MK, Joshi SP and Gupta M: ‘Hierarchical magnesium nano-composites for enhanced mechanical response’, Acta Mater., 2010, 58, (18), 6104–6114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan S, Jayalakshmi S and Gupta M: ‘Effect of ball milling the hybrid reinforcements on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–(Ti+n-Al2O3) composites’, J. Alloys Compd, 2011, 509, (26), 7229–7237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan S, Jayalakshmi S and Gupta M: ‘Effect of nano-Al2O3 addition and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–(5·6Ti+3Al) composite’, Mater. Charact., 2012, 75, 150–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan S, Sabat R, Jayalakshmi S, Suwas S and Gupta M: ‘Effect of hybridizing micron-sized Ti with nano-sized SiC on the microstructural evolution and mechanical response of Mg–5·6 Ti composite’, J. Alloys Compd, 2013, 575, 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaranarayanan S, Sabat R, Jayalakshmi S, Suwas S and Gupta M: ‘Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of Mg composites containing nano-B4C hybridized micro-Ti particulates’, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2014, 143, (3), 1178–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASM: ‘Binary alloy phase diagram’, 2nd edn., Plus Updates; 1996, Materials Park, OH, ASM International.
   Google Scholar
• Hu J, Luo R, Fei W and Yao C: ‘Effect of annealing treatment on the microstructure of matrix in SiC whisker reinforced aluminum composite’, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1999, 18, (18), 1525–1527.
   Google Scholar
• Hu M, Fei W and Yao C: ‘Effect of heat treatment on dislocation states and work hardening behaviors of SiCw/6061Al composite’, Mater. Lett., 2002, 56, (5), 637–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys FJ and Hatherly M: ‘Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena’; 1995, Oxford, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lim S and Gupta M: ‘Enhancing modulus and ductility of Mg/SiC composite through judicious selection of extrusion temperature and heat treatment’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2003, 19, (6), 803–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugandhar S, Gupta M and Sinha S: ‘Enhancing strength and ductility of Mg/SiC composites using recrystallization heat treatment’, Compos. Struct., 2006, 72, (2), 266–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suryanarayana C: ‘Mechanical alloying and milling’, Prog. Mater. Sci., 2001, 46, (1), 1–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham L, GuptaS M and Cheng L: ‘Influence of processing parameters during disintegrated melt deposition processing on near net shape synthesis of aluminium based metal matrix composites’, Mater. Sci. Technol., 1999, 15, (10), 1139–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘Standard test method for microindentation hardness of materials’, ASTM E384-11e1, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials’, ASTM E8/E8M-13a, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Standard test methods of compression testing of metallic materials at room temperature’, ASTM E9-09, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Callister WD and Rethwisch DG: ‘Materials science and engineering: an introduction’; 2007, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dieter GE: ‘Mechanical metallurgy’; 1976, New York, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla KK and Chawla N: ‘Metal–matrix composites’; 2004, New York, Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Friend C: ‘The effect of matrix properties on reinforcement in short alumina fibre–aluminium metal matrix composites’, J. Mater. Sci., 1987, 22, (8), 3005–3010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas S, Kim D.-I and Suwas S: ‘Asymmetric and symmetric rolling of magnesium: Evolution of microstructure, texture and mechanical properties’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2012, A550, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Bohlen J, Yi S, Letzig D and Kainer KU: ‘Effect of rare earth elements on the microstructure and texture development in magnesium–manganese alloys during extrusion’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, A527, (26), 7092–7098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland H, Rollett AD, Alvi MH and Cheong SW: ‘Recrystallization and texture development in hot rolled 1050 aluminum’, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2004, 467/470, 357–362.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas S, Singh Dhinwal S and Suwas S: ‘Room-temperature equal channel angular extrusion of pure magnesium’, Acta Mater., 2010, 58, (9), 3247–3261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrmann R, Frommert MM and Gottstein G: ‘Texture effects on plastic deformation of magnesium’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, A395, (1), 338–349.
   Google Scholar
• Wu H.-Y, Lin J.-Y, Gao Z.-W and Chen H.-W: ‘Effects of age heat treatment and thermomechanical processing on microstructure and mechanical behavior of LAZ1010 Mg alloy’, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, A523, (1), 7–12.
   Google Scholar