15
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Balancing fidelity and practicality in short version musculoskeletal patient reported outcome measures

, &
Pages 221-225 | Published online: 19 Jul 2013

References

  • Garratt A, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality oflife measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 2002;324:1417.
  • McHorney CA. Ten recommendations for advancing patient-centered outcomes measurement for older persons. Ann Int Med 2003;139:403–9.
  • Stratford PW, Riddle DL. Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3(23):23.
  • Haley SM, Gandek B, Siebens H, Black-Schaffer RM, Sinclair SJ, Tao W, et al. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89(2):275–83.
  • Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JEJ. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86(1):57–71.
  • Kopec JA, Sayre EC, Davis AM, Badley EM, Abrahamowicz M, Sherlock L, et al. Assessment of health-related quality of life in arthritis: conceptualization and development of five item banks using item response theory. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:33.
  • Ware J, Gandek B, Sinclair S, Bjorner J. Item response theory and computerised adaptive testing: implications for outcome measurement in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 2005;50(1):71–8.
  • Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad N. Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires. Spine 2005;30(1):130–40.9 Gabel CP, Michener L, Burkett B, Neller A. The upper limb functional index (ULFI): development and determination of reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Hand Ther 2006;19(3): 328–49.
  • Rogers JC, Irrgang JJ. Measures of adult lower extremity function. Arthritis Care Res 2003;49(S5):S67 -S84.
  • Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Group UEC. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(5):1038–46.
  • APA APA. Policy on outcome measures and treatment justification. Available from: http://apa.advsol.com.au/members/documents. Melbourne: Australian Physiotherapy Association, 2003.
  • Hart DL, Connolly JB. Pay-for-performance for physical therapy and occupational therapy: medicare part B services. Final Report. Grant No. 18-P-93066/9–01: Health & Human Services/Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Knoxville, TN: FOTO – Focus on Therapeutic Outcomes, 2006.
  • Coste J, Guillemin F, Pouchot J, Fermanian J. Methodological approaches to shortening composite measurement scales. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50(3):247–52.
  • Sackett D, Sharon E, Straus W, Richardson S, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
  • Prieto L, Alonso J, Lamarca R. Classical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reduction. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:27.
  • Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  • Kirshner B, Guyatt GH. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 1985;38(1):27–36.
  • Prieto L, Thorsen H, Juul K. Development and validation of a quality of life questionnaire for patients with colostomy or ileostomy. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:62.
  • Davidson M, Keating JL, Eyres S. A low back-specific version of the SF-36 physical functioning scale. Spine 2004;29(5):586–94.
  • Fries JF, Bruce B, Bjorner J, Rose M. More relevant, precise, and efficient items for assessment of physical function and disability: moving beyond the classic instruments. Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65(Suppl 3:iii):16–21.
  • Fries JF, Bruce B, Cella D. The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2005;23(5 Suppl 39):S53–7.
  • Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care 2000; 38(9 Suppl):II28–42.
  • Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Streiner DL, King DR. Clinical impact versus factor analysis for quality of life questionnaire construction. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50(3):233–8.
  • Moran LA, Guyatt GH, Norman GR. Establishing the minimal number of items for a responsive, valid, health-related quality of life instrument. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54(6):571–9.
  • DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S, Stone AA, Group obotPC. Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review. Med Care 2007;45(5):S12-S21.
  • Reeve B, Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Cook KF, Crane PK, Teresi JA, et al. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Med Care 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S22-S31.
  • Feise RJ, Menke JM. Functional rating index. A new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine 2001;26(1):78–86.
  • Liang MH, Jette AM. Measuring functional ability in chronic arthritis: a critical review. Arthritis Rheum 1981;24:80–6.
  • Locker D, Allen PF. Developing short-form measures of oral health-related quality of life. J Public Health Dent 2002;62(1):13–20.
  • Badia X, Colombo JA, Lara N, Llorens MA, Olmos L, Sainz de los Terreros M, et al. Combination of qualitative and quantitative methods for developing a new health related quality of life measure for patients with anogenital warts. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3(1):24.
  • Walter OB, Becker J, Bjorner JB, Fliege H, Klapp BF, Rose M. Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for ‘Anxiety’ (Anxiety-CAT). Qual Life Res 2007;16(Suppl 1):143–55.
  • Webster K, Cella D, Yost K. The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) measurement system: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:79.
  • Hart DL, Mioduski JE, Werneke MW, Stratford PW. Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59(9):947–56.
  • Hays RD, Liu H, Spritzer K, Cella D. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study. Med Care 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S32-S38.
  • Ader D. Developing the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Med Care 2007;45(5):S1–2.
  • Roland M, Fairbank JCT. The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 2000;25(24):3115–24.
  • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL. Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale. Spine 2000;25(16): 2095–102.
  • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Stratford D. Development and initial validation of the upper extremity functional index. Physiother Can 2001;52:259–67, 81.
  • Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Ther 1999;79(4): 371–83.
  • Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14(7):409–15.
  • Fairbank JCT, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine 2000;25(22):2940–52.
  • Michener LA, Leggins BG. A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. J Hand Ther 2001;14:68–76.
  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
  • McHorney CA, Cohen AS. Equating health status measures with item response theory: illustrations with functional status items. Med Care 2000;38(9 Suppl):II43–59.
  • Ware J. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000;24(24):3130–9.
  • Ware J. Patient-based assessment: tools for monitoring and improving healthcare outcomes. Behav Healthc Tomorrow 1996;5(3):87–8.
  • DeSalvo KB, Fisher WP, Tran K, Bloser N, Merrill W, Peabody J. Assessing measurement properties of two single-item general health measures. Qual Life Res 2006;15(2):191–201.
  • Chansirinukor W, Maher CG, Latimer J, Hush J. Comparison of the functional rating index and the 18-item Roland-Morris disability questionnaire: responsiveness and reliability. Spine 2005;30(1):141–5.
  • Stratford P, Binkley J. Measurement properties of the RM-18: a modified version of the Roland-Morris disability scale. Spine 1997;22:2416–21.
  • Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Knol DL, van den Brandt PA. 24-item Roland-Morris disability questionnaire was preferred out of six functional status questionnaires for post-lumbar disc surgery. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57(3):268–76.
  • Cook K, O’Malley KJ, Roddey TS. Dynamic assessment of health outcomes: time to let the CAT out of the bag? Health Serv Res 2005;40(5-Pt 2):1694–711.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.