Use of technology as an adjunct to improve health outcomes for survivors of cancer

References

• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2008. Cat. no. AUS 99. Canberra (ACT): AIHW; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Cancer [document on the Internet]. 2009 [cited 2010 June 13]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2008–2013 action plan for the global strategy for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases [document on the Internet]. 2008 [cited 2010 June 13]. Available from: http://www.who.int/nmh/Actionplan-PC-NCD-2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown BW, Brauner C, Minnotte M. Noncancer deaths in white adult cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:979–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Harten WH, van Noort O, Warmerdam R, Hendricks H, Seidel E. Assessment of rehabilitation needs in cancer patients. Int J Rehabil Res 1998;21:247–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt M, Herdman R, Holland J, ed, editors. Meeting psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer. Washington DC: The National Academic Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner H. Long-term survival rates of cancer patients achieved by the end of the 20th century: a period analysis. Lancet 2002;360:1131–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte National E-Health and Information Principal Committee. National E-health strategy [document on the Internet]. 2008 [cited 2010 June 13]. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/604CF066BE48789DCA25751D000C15C7/$File/National%20eHealth%20Strategy%20final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Berben SA, Schoonhoven L. Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010;12:e18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khor Z, Marsh P. Life online: the web in 2020. Oxford: The Social Issues Research Centre; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee T, Fischetti M. Weaving the web: the original design and ultimate destiny of the world wide web by its inventor. San Francisco, CA: Harper; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Norman CD, Skinner HA. Engaging youth in e-health promotion: lessons learned from a decade of TeenNet research. Adolesc Med State Art Rev 2007;18:357–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wantland D, Portillo C, Holzemer W, Slaughter R, McGee E. The effectiveness of web-based vs non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioural change outcomes. J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr C, Murray E, Stevenson F, Gore C, Nazareth I. Internet interventions for long-term conditions: patient and caregiver quality criteria. J Med Internet Res 2006;8:e13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire R. Examining intervention components for promoting adherence to strength weight training exercise in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors with bone loss. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska Medical Centre: 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wilbur J, Vassalo A, Chandler P, McDevitt J, Miller AM. Midlife women’s adherence to home-based walking during maintenance. Nurs Res 2005;54:33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A, Murphy-Sheehy P, Gildesgame C, Chueh H, et al.. A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care 2003;26:750–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander GL, McClure JB, Calvi JH, Divine GW, Stopponi MA, Rolnick SJ, et al.. A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. Am J Public Health 2010;100:319–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenadel J, Kaegi E, Laidlaw J, Kovacik G, Cortinois A, Kang R, et al.. Leveling the playing field: the personal coach program as an innovative approach to assess and address the supportive care needs of underserved cancer patients. J Support Oncol 2007;5:185–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Graham AL, Abrams DB. Reducing the cancer burden of lifestyle factors: opportunities and challenges of the internet. J Med Internet Res 2005;7:e26.
   Google Scholar
• Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, Plant K. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care 2006;44:964–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spittaels H, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Evaluation of a website delivered, computer-tailored intervention for increasing physical activity in the general population. Prev Med 2007;44:209–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Pleis J. Using the internet for health-related activities: findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res 2009;11:e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norum J, Grev A, Moen MA, Balteskard L, Holthe K. Information and communication technology (ICT) in oncology. Patients’ and relatives’ experiences and suggestions. Support Care Cancer 2003;11:286–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, McTavish F, Arora NK, Mendenhall J, et al.. Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:435–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnane NA, Milne DJ. The role of the internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer: a literature review. Support Care Cancer 2010;18:1123–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrat E, Burns J, See TS, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;4:CD004274.
   Google Scholar
• Gysels M, Higginson IJ. Interactive technologies and videotapes for patient education in cancer care: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Support Care Cancer 2007;15:7–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bylund CL, Gueguen JA, Sabee CM, Imes RS, Li Y, Sanford AA. Provider–patient dialogue about internet health information: an exploration of strategies to improve the provider–patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns 2007;66:346–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helft PR, Hlubocky F, Daugherty CK. American oncologists’ views of internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:942–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright MA, Fleisher L, Thomsen C, Morrad ME, Marcuse A, Gehring W. Exploring e-health usage and interest among cancer information service users: the need for personalized interactions and multiple channels remains. J Health Commun 2005;10:35–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker ED. Technology and quality of life outcomes. Semin Oncol Nurs 2010;26:47–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hesse BW, Hanna C, Massett HA, Hesse NK. Outside the box: will information technology be a viable intervention to improve the quality of cancer care? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010:81–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 2003;289:2400–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey M, Thomas B. Rehabilitation of cancer patients. J Postgrad Med 2001;47:62–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, Boberg EW, Bricker E, Pingiree S, Chan CL. The use and impact of a computer-based support system for people living with AIDS and HIV infection. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994:604–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zilliacus EM, Meiser B, Lobb EA, Kirk J, Warwick L, Tucker K. Women’s experience of telehealth cancer genetic counselling. J Genet Couns 2010;19:463–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhauser L, Kreps GL. Online cancer communication: meeting the literacy, cultural and linguistic needs of diverse audiences. Patient Educ Couns 2008;71:365–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziebland S. The importance of being expert: the quest for cancer information on the internet. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:1783–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher W. Gold Coast general practitioners understanding pertaining to reliability, interactive and usability components associated with health websites. Behav Inform Technol 2009;28:39–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vital Wave Consulting. mHealth for development: the opportunity of mobile technology for healthcare in the developing world. Berkshire, Washington DC: UN Foundation and Vodafone Foundation Partnership; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chou WS, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res 2009;11:e48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielli E, Carminati F, La Capra S, Lina M, Brunelli C, Tamburini M. A wireless health outcomes monitoring system (WHOMS): development and field testing with cancer patients using mobile phones. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2004;4:7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maguire R, McCann L, Miller M, Kearney N. Nurse’s perceptions and experiences of using a mobile-phone-based advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) to monitor and manage chemotherapy-related toxicity. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2008;12:380–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps GL, Neuhauser L. New directions in eHealth communication: opportunities and challenges. Patient Educ Couns 2010;78:329–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter M, Wray R. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav 2003;27:227–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus A, Mason M, Wolfe P, Rimer B, Lipkus I, Strecher V, et al.. The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Information Service. J Health Commun 2005;10:83–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets T, Brug J, de Vries H. Effects of tailoring health messages on physical activity. Health Educ Res 2008;23:402–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strecher V, Shiffman S, West R. Randomized controlled trial of a web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction 2005;100:682–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson D, Walden H, White M, York-Crowe E, Newton R, Alfonso A, et al.. Two-year internet-based randomized controlled trial for weight loss in African-American girls. Obesity 2006;14:1231–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiris G. The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: concepts and challenges. Patient Educ Couns 2006;62:178–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew M, Bell R, Hunter D. Influence of psychological coping on survival and recurrence in people with cancer: systematic review. BMJ 2002;325:1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Breast Cancer Centre and National Cancer Control Initiative. Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. Sydney, NSW: National Breast Cancer Centre; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Jones R, Pearson J, McGregor S, Cawsey AJ, Barrett A, Craig N, et al.. Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients. BMJ 1999;319:1241–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray E, Khadjesari Z, White IR, Kalaitzaki E, Godfrey C, McCambridge J, et al.. Methodological challenges in online trials. J Med Internet Res 2009;11:e9.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin EB, Bach PB. Cancer’s next frontier: addressing high and increasing costs. JAMA 2010;303:1086–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atienza AA, Hesse BW, Gustafson DH, Croyle RT. e-health research and patient-centered care. Examining theory, methods, and application. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:85–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar