Physiotherapists’ assessment and management of psychosocial factors (Yellow and Blue Flags) in individuals with back pain

References

• Iles RA, Davidson M, Taylor NF. Psychosocial predictors of failure to return to work in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(8):507–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane GJ, Pallewatte N, Paudyal P, Blyth FM, Coggon D, Crombez G, et al. Evaluation of work-related psychosocial factors and regional musculoskeletal pain: Results from a EULAR task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(6):885–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA. 2010;303(13):1295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staal JB, Hlobil H, van Tulder MW, Waddell G, Burton AK, Koes BW, et al. Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: An international comparison. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(9):618–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group (AAMPGG). Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain. [document on the Internet]. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press; 2003. Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au
   Google Scholar
• Burton AK, Balagué F, Cardon G, Eriksen HR, Henrotin Y, Lahad A, et al. Chapter 2. European guidelines for prevention in low back pain: November 2004. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 2):S136–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: A joint clinical practice guideline from the American college of physicians and the American pain society. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(7):478–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossignol M, Arsenault B, Dionne C, Tousignant M, Truchon M, Allard P et al. Clinic on low-back pain in interdisciplinary practice (CLIP) guidelines. Montreal: Direction de Sante Publique, Agence de la Sante et des services sociaux de Montreal; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC). New Zealand acute low back pain guide. Wellington: Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC); 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall NAS, Burton AK, Main CJ, Watson P. Tackling musculoskeletal problems: A guide for the clinic and workplace – identifying obstacles using the psychosocial flags framework. London: The Stationary Office; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• National Health Service (NHS) Evidence. Back pain – low (without radiculopathy). [last updated 2009 Nov; accessed 2011 Aug 30]. Available from: www.cks.library.nhs.uk
   Google Scholar
• Kendall NAS, Linton SJ, Main C. Psychosocial yellow flags for acute low back pain: ‘Yellow flags’ as an analogue to ‘Red flags’. Eur J Pain. 1998;2(1):87–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main CJ, Sullivan MJL, Watson PJ. Pain management: Practical applications of the biopsychosocial perspective in clinical and occupational settings. London: Elsevier; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gatchel RJ. Musculoskeletal disorders: Primary and secondary interventions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14:161–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall N, Linton SJ, Main CJ. Guide to assessing psychosocial yellow flags in acute low back pain. Wellington: Accident Compensation Corporation; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. A fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain. 1993;52(2):157–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton SJ, Halldén K. Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and sub acute back pain. Clin J Pain. 1998;14(3):209–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, Mullis R, Main CJ, Foster NE, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: Identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(5):632–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linton S J, editor. New avenues for the prevention of chronic musculoskeletal pain and disability: pain research and clinical management. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2002. No. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw WS, van der Windt DA, Main CJ, Loisel P, Linton SJ. ‘Decade of the Flags’ Working Group. Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (‘Blue flags;) in back disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):64–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JA, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, Sheppard L, Wickizer TM, Wu R, et al. Worker recovery expectations and fear-avoidance predict work disability in a population-based workers' compensation back pain sample. Spine. 2006;31(6):682–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadyl J, McPherson K. Return to work after injury: A review of evidence regarding expectations and injury perceptions, and their influence on outcome. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):362–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iles R, Davidson M, Taylor N, O’Halloran P. Systematic review of the ability of recovery expectations to predict outcomes in non-chronic non-specific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):25–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray H, Adefolarin AT, Howe TE. A systematic review of instruments for the assessment of work-related psychosocial factors (blue flags) in individuals with non-specific low back pain. Man Ther. 2011;16(6):531–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marhold C, Linton SJ, Melin L. Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: Evaluation of a questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(2):65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical Standards Advisory Group on Back Pain. Report of a clinical standards advisory group on back pain. London: HMSO; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of General Practitioners. Clinical guidelines for the management of acute low back pain. London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Holdsworth LK, Webster VS. Direct access to physiotherapy in primary care: Now?—and into the future? Physiotherapy. 2004;90(2):64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Foster NE, Williams B, Grove S, Gamlin J, Salisbury C. The evidence for and against ‘PhysioDirect’ telephone assessment and advice services. Physiotherapy. 2011;97(1):78–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leemrijse CJ, Swinkels ICS, Veenhof C. Direct access to physical therapy in the Netherlands: Results from the first year in community-based physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2008;88:936–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffett JK, Jackson DA, Gardiner ED, Torgerson DJ, Coulton S, Eaton S, et al. Randomized trial of two physiotherapy interventions for primary care neck and back pain patients: ‘McKenzie’ vs brief physiotherapy pain management. Rheumatology. 2006;45(12):1514–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw W, Main C, Johnston V. Addressing occupational factors in the management of low back pain: Implications for physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):777–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson PJ. Psychosocial assessment: The emergence of a new fashion, or a new tool in physiotherapy for musculoskeletal pain? Physiotherapy. 1999;85(10):530.
   Google Scholar
• Craik R. A convincing case-for the psychologically informed physical therapist. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):606–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main CJ, George SZ. Psychologically informed practice for management of low back pain: Future directions in practice and research. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):820–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50 A guideline developer’s handbook. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Critcal appraisal skills programme checklists. [updated 2013; accessed 2013 Jan 29]. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/
   Google Scholar
• Overmeer T, Boersma K, Main CJ, Linton SJ. Do physical therapists change their beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills and behaviour after a biopsychosocially orientated university course? J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(4):724–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overmeer T, Boersma K, Denison E, Linton S. Does teaching physical therapists to deliver a biopsychosocial treatment program result in better patient outcomes? A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):804–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson K, Lewis M, Hay E. Do physiotherapists’ attitudes towards evidence-based practice change as a result of an evidence-based educational programme? J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):207–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson K, Lewis M, Hay E. Does physiotherapy management of low back pain change as a result of an evidence-based educational programme?. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12(3):365–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demmelmaier I, Asenlof P, Lindberg P, Denison E. Biopsychosocial predictors of pain, disability, health care consumption, and sick leave in first-episode and long-term back pain: A longitudinal study in the general population. Int J Behav Med. 2010;17:79–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green AJ, Jackson DA, Klaber Moffett JA. An observational study of physiotherapists’ use of cognitive-behavioural principles in the management of patients with back pain and neck pain. Physiotherapy. 2008;94(4):306–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy CJ, Rushton A, Billis V, Arnall F, Oldham JA. Development of a clinical examination in non-specific low back pain: A Delphi technique. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(4):263–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billis EV, McCarthy CJ, Stathopoulos I, Kapreli E, Pantzou P, Oldham JA. The clinical and cultural factors in classifying low back pain patients within Greece: A qualitative exploration of Greek health professionals. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13(3):337–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson FC, Brownlee M, Webster V. A Delphi study investigating consensus among expert physiotherapists in relation to the management of low back pain. Musculoskeletal Care. 2008;6(4):197–210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Côté AM, Durand MJ, Tousignant M, Poitras S. Physiotherapists and use of low back pain guidelines: A qualitative study of the barriers and facilitators. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):94–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poitras S, Rossignol M, Dionne C, Tousignant M, Truchon M, Arsenault B, et al. An interdisciplinary clinical practice model for the management of low-back pain in primary care: The CLIP project. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9(1):54–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pincus T, Woodcock A, Vogel S. Returning back pain patients to work: How private musculoskeletal practitioners outside the national health service perceive their role (an interview study). J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):322–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overmeer T, Linton SJ, Boersma K. Do physical therapists recognise established risk factors? Swedish physical therapists’ evaluation in comparison to guidelines. Physiotherapy (London). 2004;90(1):35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop A, Foster NE. Do physical therapists in the united kingdom recognize psychosocial factors in patients with acute low back pain? Spine. 2005;30:1316–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent PM, Keating JL, Taylor NF. Primary care clinicians use variable methods to assess acute nonspecific low back pain and usually focus on impairments. Man Ther. 2009;14(1):88–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G, McCulloch JA, Kummel E, Venner RM. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. 1980;5(2):117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main CJ, Wood P, Hollis S, Spanswick CC, Waddell G. The distress and risk assessment method. A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome. Spine. 1992;17(1):42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demmelmaier I, Denison E, Lindberg P, Åsenlöf P. Physiotherapists’ telephone consultations regarding back pain: A method to analyze screening of risk factors. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26(7):468–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster NE, Thompson KA, Baxter GD, Allen JM. Management of nonspecific low back pain by physiotherapists in Britain and Ireland. A descriptive questionnaire of current clinical practice. Spine. 1999;24:1332–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracey JH, McDonough SM, Baxter GD. Physiotherapy management of low back pain: A survey of current practice in northern Ireland. Spine. 2002;27:406–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overmeer T, Linton SJ, Holmquist L, Eriksson M, Engfeldt P. Do evidence-based guidelines have an impact in primary care? A cross-sectional study of Swedish physicians and physiotherapists. Spine. 2005;30:146–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay S, Todd C, Finlay I, Grande G, Wyatt P. Not another questionnaire! maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract. 2002;19(1):105–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheltoukhova K, O’Dea L, Bevan S. Taking the strain: The impact of musculoskeletal disorders on work and home life. London: The Work Foundation; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Work & Pensions. Fitness for work: The government response to ‘Health at work – an independent review of sickness absence’. London: The Stationary Office; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Foster N, Delitto A. Embedding psychosocial perspectives within clinical management of low back pain: Integration of psychosocially informed management principles into physical therapist practice-challenges and opportunities. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar