Investigating the psychometric properties of patient reported outcome measures in individuals with chronic diabetic neuropathic pain: prospective longitudinal cohort study protocol

References

• Treede RD. Redefinition of neuropathic pain and a grading system for clinical use: consensus statement on clinical and research diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2008;70(18):1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfaye S, Boulton AJ, Dyck PJ, Freeman R, Horowitz M, Kempler P, et al. Diabetic neuropathies: update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and treatments. Diab Care. 2010;33(10):2285–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmader KE. Epidemiology and impact on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(6):350–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Korff M, Katon W, Lin EH, Simon G, Ciechanowski P, Ludman E, et al. Work disability among individuals with diabetes. Diab Care. 2005;28(6):1326–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Cieza A, Ewert T, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Ustun TB. Application of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(5):281–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin RH, Backonja M, Rowbotham MC, Allen RR, Argoff CR, Bennett GJ, et al. Advances in neuropathic pain: diagnosis, mechanisms, and treatment recommendations. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(11):1524–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruccu G, Anand P, Attal N, Garcia-Larrea L, Haanpaa M, Jorum E, et al. EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment. Eur J Neurol. 2004;11(3):153–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruccu G, Sommer C, Anand P, Attal N, Baron R, Garcia-Larrea L, et al. EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment: revised 2009. Eur J Neurol. 2010;17(8):1010–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haanpaa M, Attal N, Backonja M, Baron R, Bennett M, Bouhassira D, et al. NeuPSIG guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment. Pain. 2011;152(1):14–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. p. 736.
   Google Scholar
• Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med. 1994;23(2):129–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilron I, Booher SL, Rowan MS, Smoller MS, Max MB. A randomized, controlled trial of high-dose dextromethorphan in facial neuralgias. Neurology. 2000;55(7):964–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan M. Measuring functioning and well-being – the medical outcomes study approach. In: Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Psycho-oncology; Duke University Press; 1995, vol. 4(2). p. 163–5.
   Google Scholar
• Zelman DC, Gore M, Dukes E, Tai KS, Brandenburg N. Validation of a modified version of the brief pain inventory for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;29(4):401–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research. applications to practice, 3rd revised United States edn. Upper Saddle River/US: Prentice Hall; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Group SCS, Ebenso J, Fuzikawa P, Melchior H, Wexler R, Piefer A, et al. The development of a short questionnaire for screening of activity limitation and safety awareness (SALSA) in clients affected by leprosy or diabetes. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(9):689–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenso J, Velema JP. Test-retest reliability of the Screening Activity Limitation and Safety Awareness (SALSA) scale in North-West Nigeria. Leprosy Rev. 2009;80(2):197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner A, Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1987;6(4):441–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17(1):101–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005;85(3):257–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkies IS, Schmitz PI, van der Meche FG, van Doorn PA. Psychometric evaluation of a new sensory scale in immune-mediated polyneuropathies. Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) Group. Neurology. 2000;54(4):943–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki P, Waldorf D. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociol Methods Res. 1981;10(2):141–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett MI, Smith BH, Torrance N, Potter J. The S-LANSS score for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin: validation for use in clinical and postal research. J Pain. 2005;6(3):149–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain, part III: pain terms, a current list with definitions and notes on usage, 2nd edn. Seattle: IASP Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM. How to measure comorbidity: a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(3):221–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLean G, Tobias M. The New Zealand physical activity questionnaires: Report on the validation and use of the NZPAQ-LF and NZPAQ-SF self-report physical activity survey instruments. New Zealand: SPARC; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst H, Bolton J. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004;27(1):26–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York: Wiley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner D, Geddes J. Intention to treat analysis in clinical trials when there are missing data. Evid Based Ment Health. 2001;4(3):70–1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexell JE, Downham DY. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(9):719–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz-Hubsch T, Fimmers R, Rakowicz M, Rola R, Zdzienicka E, Fancellu R, et al. Responsiveness of different rating instruments in spinocerebellar ataxia patients. Neurology. 2010;74(8):678–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, Fourth (January 24, 2013) edn. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2013.
   Google Scholar