Sustaining patient and public involvement in research: A case study of a research centre

References

• Barnes M, Cotterell P. Critical perspectives on user involvement. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow E, Ross F, Grocott P, Bennett J. A model and measure for quality service user involvement in health research. Int J Consum Stud 2010;34(5):532–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford P. Beyond the usual suspects. London: Shaping Our Lives; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mathie E, Wilson P, Poland F, McNeilly E, Howe A, Staniszewska S Consumer involvement in health research: a UK scoping and survey. Int J Consum Stud 2014;38(1):35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boote J, Baird W, Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 2010;95(1):10–23.
   Google Scholar
• INVOLVE [Internet]. Briefing notes for researchers. 2012 Feb [cited 2014 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.invo.org.uk/resource-centre/resource-for-researchers.
   Google Scholar
• de Wit M. Patient participation in rheumatology research. A four level responsive evaluation. PhD thesis. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect 2014;17(5):637–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewlett S, de Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheumatol 2006;55(4):2246–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wright D, Foster C, Amir Z, Elliott J, Wilson R. Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research. Health Expect 2010;13(4):359–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boote J, Barber R, Cooper C. Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy 2006;75(3):280–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit M, Berlo S, Aanerud G, Aletaha D, Bijlsma J, Croucher L European league against rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70(5):722–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson P, Canvin K. Translating healthy policy into research practice. In: Lowes L, Hulatt I, (eds.) Involving service users in health and social care research. Abingdon: Routledge; 2005. p. 48–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ives J, Damery S, Redwood S. PPI, paradoxes and Plato: who's sailing the ship? J Med Ethics 2012;39(3):181–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe A, Delaney S, Romero J, Tinsleya A, Vicary P. Public involvement in health research: a case study of one NHS project over 5 years. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2010;11(1):17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ong BN, Hooper H. Involving users in low back pain research. Health Expect 2003;6(4):332–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jinks C, Ong BN, O'Neill T. The Keele Community Knee Pain Forum: Engaging with stakeholders for a Knee Pain Prevention Project (KNEPP). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10(1):85.
   Google Scholar
• Carter P, Beech R, Coxon C, Thomas M, Jinks C. Mobilising experiential knowledge for applied health care research. Contemporary Social Science. 2013;8(3):307–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rickard W, Purtell R. Finding a way to pay in the UK: methods and mechanisms for paying service users involved in research. Disabil Soc 2011;26(1):33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmore C, Carter P, Jinks C, Ong P, Rhodes R. Supporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: the role of a user support worker. In: Bec H, (ed.). Examples of training and support for public involvement in research: sharing innovative practice workshop. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2010: pp. 48–50.
   Google Scholar
• Burton P. Conceptual, theoretical and practical issues in measuring the benefits of public participation. Evaluation 2009;15(3):263–84.
   Google Scholar
• Little M, Jordens CFC, Paul K, Sayers EJ, Cruickshank JA, Stegeman J, Montgomery K. Discourse in different voices: reconciling N = 1 and N = many. Soc Sci Med 2002;55(7):1079–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grime J, Dudley B. Developing written information on osteoarthritis for patients: facilitating user involvement by exposure to qualitative research. Health Expect 2014;17(2):164–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin H. What's in a name: ‘client’, ‘patient’, ‘customer’, ‘consumer’ ‘expert by experience’, ‘service user’-What's Next? Br J Soc Work 2008;39(6):1101–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr A, Cunningham-Burley S, Tutton R. Shifting subject positions: experts and lay people in public dialogue. Soc Stud Sci 2007;37(3):385–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape D, Kirkham J, Preston J, Popay J, Britten N, Collins M, Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open 2014;4(1): e004217 [cited 2014 Mar 20] doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013–004217.
   Google Scholar