Assessment of biological properties of collagen/hyaluronic acid composite scaffolds containing nanobioactive glass

References

• V. Karageorgiou and D. Kaplan: Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 5474–5491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Shin, S. Jo and A. G. Mikos: Biomimetic materials for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2003, 24, 4353–4364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. H. Zhou, S. L. He, T. L. Huang, L. H. Liu, Q. Q. Liu, Y. M. Zhao, B. L. Ou, W. N. Zeng, Z. M. Yang and D. F. Cao: Degradation behavior and biological properties of gelatin/hyaluronic acid composite scaffolds. Mater. Res. Innov., 2013, 17, 420–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. S. Desphande, R. Bajpai and A. K. Bajpai: Water Sorption and Biocompatibility Evaluation of poly(vinyl alcohol – acrylonitrile) based hydrogels. Soft Mater., 2013, 11, 221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Miyashita, S. Shimmura, H. Kobayashi, T. Taguchi, N. Asano-Kato, Y. Uchino, M. Kato, J. Shimazaki, J. Tanaka and K. Tsubota: Collagen-immobilized poly(vinyl alcohol) as an artificial cornea scaffold that supports a stratified corneal epithelium. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B, 2006, 76B, 56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Bai, X. Wang, W. Yuan, H. Wang and Z. Wang: Application of PLGA/type I collagen/chitosan artificial composite dura mater in the treatment of dural injury. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 2013, 24, 2247–2254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. E. J. Chen and G. Abatangelo: Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair. Wound Repair Regen., 1999, 7, 79–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. N. Park, J. C. Park, H. O. Kim, M. J. Song and H. Suh: Characterization of porous collagen/hyaluronic acid scaffold modified by 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide cross-linking. Biomaterials, 2002, 23, 1205–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. T. Lee and Y. D. Lee: Preparation of porous biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hyaluronic acid blend scaffolds: Characterization, in vitro cells culture and degradation behaviors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 2006, 17, 1411–1420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Lungu, I. Titorencu, M. G. Albu, N. M. Florea, E. Vasile, H. Iovu, V. Jinga and M. Simionescu: The effect of BMP-4 loaded in 3d collagen-hyaluronic acid scaffolds on biocompatibility assessed with MG 63 osteoblast-like cells. Dig. J. Nanomater. Bios., 2011, 6, 1897–1908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Segura, B. C. Anderson, P. H. Chung, R. E. Webber, K. R. Shull and L. D. Shea: Crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels: A strategy to functionalize and pattern. Biomaterials, 2005, 26, 359–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. H. Zhou, Z. M. Yang, T. L. Huang, L. H. Liu, Q. Q. Liu, Y. M. Zhao, W. N. Zeng, Q. F. Yi and D. F. Cao: Effect of chemical cross-linking on properties of gelatin/hyaluronic acid composite hydrogels. Polym. Plast. Technol., 2013, 52, 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. H. Zhou, Z. M. Yang, T. L. Huang, L. H. Liu, Q. Q. Liu, W. N. Zeng, D. F. Cao and S. J. Ma: Characterization of biocompatible scaffolds based on gelatin and hyaluronic acid for fibroblasts culture. Polym. Polym. Compos., 2012, 20, 791–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Fujibayashi, M. Neo, H. M. Kim, T. Kokubo and T. A. Nakamura: Comparative study between in vivo bone growth and in vitro apatite formation on Na2O-CaO-SiO2 glasses. Biomaterials, 2003, 24, 1349–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Foppiano, S. J. Marshall, G. W. Marshall, E. Saiz and A. P. Tomsia: Bioactive glass coatings affect the behaviour of osteoblast-like cells. Acta Biomater., 2007, 3, 765–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. Gough, J. R. Jones and L. L. Hench: Nodule formation and mineralization ofhuman primary osteoblasts cultured on a porous bioactive glass scaffold. Biomaterials, 2004, 25, 2039–2046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Q. He and L. Z. Xiong: Assessment of cytocompatibility of bulk modified poly-L-lactic acid biomaterials. Polym. Plast. Technol., 2009, 48, 1020–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. L. Hench: Genetic design of bioactive glass. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2009, 29, 1257–1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mozafari, M. Rabiee, M. Azami and S. Maleknia: Biomimetic formation of apatite on the surface of porous gelatin/bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffolds. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010, 257, 1740–1749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. R. Boccaccini, M. Erol, W. J. Stark, D. Mohn, Z. Hong and J. F. Mano: Polymer/bioactive glass nanocomposites for biomedical applications: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol., 2010, 70, 1764–1776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Roy, N. Saha, P. Humpolicek and P. Saha: Permeability and biocompatibility of novel medicated hydrogel wound dressings. Soft Mater., 2010, 8, 338–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. A. Rubenstein, S. M. Venkitachalam, D. Zamfir, F. Wang, H. Lu, M. D. Frame and W. Yin: In vitro biocompatibility of sheath–core cellulose-acetate-based electrospun scaffolds towards endothelial cells and platelets. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 2010, 21, 1713–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. H. Qu, Q. Wu and G. Q. Chen: In vitro study on hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate). J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed., 2006, 17, 1107–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Wu, F. F. Zhu and G. S. Tao: In-vitro biocompatibility evaluation of collagen-hyaluronic acid/bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffold. J. Macromol. Sci. A, 2013, 50A, 1121–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Imai and Y. J. Nose: New method for evaluation of antithrombogenicity of materials. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1972, 6, 165–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. H. Zhou, D. F. Cao, T. L. Huang, L. L. Liu, Q. Q. Liu, Y. M. Zhao, B. L. Ou, W. N. Zeng, G. R. Xu, A. P. Tang and Z. M. Yang: Fabrication and characterisation of gelatinhyaluronic acid/nanobioactive glass hybrid scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater. Res. Innov., 2013, 17, 532–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 11: tests for systemic toxicity’: ‘ISO 10993-11’; 2006, Geneva, Switzerland, International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Selection of tests for interaction with blood’: ‘ISO 10993-4’; 1992, Geneva, Switzerland, International Standard Organization.
   Google Scholar