Spider silk inspired materials and sustainability: perspective

References

• Viney C. and Bell F. I.: ‘Inspiration versus duplication with biomolecular fibrous materials: learning nature's lessons without copying nature's limitations’, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 2004, 8, 165–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny M.: ‘The physical properties of spider's silk and their role in the design of orb-webs’, J. Exp. Biol., 1976, 65, 483–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny M. W.: ‘Silks – their properties and functions’ ‘The mechanical properties of biological materials’, 246–272; 1980, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gosline J., Denny M. and Demont M. E.: ‘Spider silk as rubber’, Nature, 1984, 309, 551–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosline J. M., DeMont M. E. and Denny M. W.: ‘The structure and properties of spider silk’, Endeavour, 1986, 10, 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F. and Knight D. P.: ‘Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk’, Nature, 2001, 410, 541–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosline J. M., Guerette P. A., Ortlepp C. S. and Savage K. N.: ‘Mechanical design of spider silk: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function’, J. Exp. Biol., 1999, 202, 3295–3303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benyus J.: ‘Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature’, 1997, New York, William Morrow & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Craig C. L., Bernard G. D. B. and Coddington J. A.: ‘Evolutionary shifts in the spectral properties of spider silks’, Evolution, 1994, 48, 287–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huby N., Vié V., Beaufils S., Lefèvre T., Paquet-Mercier F., Pézolet M. and Bêche B.: ‘Native spider silk as a biological optical fiber’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2013, 102, 123702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang X., Liu G. and Wang X.: ‘New secrets of spider silk: exceptionally high thermal conductivity and its abnormal change under stretching’, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 1482–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L., Chen T., Ban H. and Liu L.: ‘Hydrogen bonding-assisted thermal conduction in β-sheet crystals of spider silk protein’, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 7786–7791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F. and Edmonds D.: ‘Consequences of electrical conductivity in an orb spider's capture web’, Naturwissenschaften, 2013, 100, 1163–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackledge T. A. and Hayashi C. Y.: ‘Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata (Fabricius 1775)’, J. Exp. Biol., 2006, 209, 2452–2461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F. and Porter D.: ‘Spider silk as archetypal protein elastomer’, Soft Matter, 2006, 2, 377–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rising A., Nimmervol H., Grip S., Fernandez-Arias A., Storckenfeldt E., Knight D., Vollrath F. and Engström W.: ‘Spider silk proteins – mechanical property and gene sequence’, Zool. Sci., 2005, 22, 273–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau M. -E., Lefèvre T. and Pézolet M.: ‘Conformation and orientation of proteins in various types of silk fibers produced by Nephila clavipes spiders’, Biomacromolecules, 2009, 10, 2945–2953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T., Boudreault S., Cloutier C. and Pézolet M.: ‘Diversity of molecular transformations involved in the formation of spider silks’, J. Mol. Biol., 2011, 405, 238–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi C. Y., Shipley N. H. and Lewis R. V.: ‘Hypotheses that correlate the sequence, structure, and mechanical properties of spider silk proteins’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1999, 24, 271–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy J. G. and Scheibel T.: ‘Composite materials based on silk proteins’, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2010, 35, 1093–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X., Cebe P., Weiss A. S., Omenetto F. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Protein-based composite materials’, Mater. Today, 2012, 15, 208–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omenetto F. G. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘New opportunities for an ancient material’, Science, 2010, 329, 528–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMarco R. L. and Heilshorn S. C.: ‘Multifunctional materials through modular protein engineering’, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 3923–3940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T., Byette F., Marcotte I. and Auger M.: ‘Protein- and peptide-based materials: a source of inspiration for innovation’, in ‘Functional materials – for energy, sustainable development and biomedical sciences’, (ed. Gauvin R. et al.., 415–442; 2014, Berlin, De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Spiess K., Lammel A. and Scheibel T.: ‘Recombinant spider silk proteins for applications in biomaterials’, Macromol. Biosci., 2010, 10, 998–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence B. D., Cronin-Golomb M., Georgakoudi I., Kaplan D. L. and Omenetto F. G.: ‘Bioactive silk protein biomaterial systems for optical devices’, Biomacromolecules, 2008, 9, 1214–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao H., Kaplan D. L. and Omenetto F. G.: ‘Silk materials – a road to sustainable high technology’, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 2824–2837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibel T.: ‘Protein fibers as performance proteins: new technologies and applications’, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2005, 16, 427–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X., Kim H. J., Wong C., Vepari C., Matsumoto A. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Fibrous proteins and tissue engineering’, Mater. Today, 2006, 9, 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasoju N. and Bora U.: ‘Silk fibroin in tissue engineering’, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 2012, 1, 393–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vepari C. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Silk as a biomaterial’, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2007, 21, 991–1007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy J. G., Egaña A. L. and Scheibel T. R.: ‘Engineered spider silk protein-based composites for drug delivery’, Macromol. Biosci., 2013, 13, 1431–1437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu B., Kurland N. E., Bano S., Patra C., Engel F. B., Yadavalli V. K. and Kundu S. C.: ‘Silk proteins for biomedical applications: bioengineering perspectives’, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2014, 39, 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman G. H., Diaz F., Jakuba C., Calabro T., Horan R. L., Chen T., Lu H., Richmond J. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Silk-based biomaterials’, Biomaterials, 2003, 24, 401–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang L. and Xia Q.: ‘The progress and future of enhancing antiviral capacity by transgenic technology in the silkworm Bombyx mori’, Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 2014, 48, 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy J. G., Römer L. M. and Scheibel T. R.: ‘Polymeric materials based on silk proteins’, Polymer, 2008, 49, 4309–4327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabotyagova O. S., Cebe P. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Protein-based block copolymers’, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12, 269–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F., Porter D. and Holland C.: ‘The science of silks’, MRS Bull., 2014, 38, 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: ‘Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment’, 2005, Washington, DC, Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson Å., Chapin F. S., Lambin E. F., Lenton T. M., Scheffer M., Folke C., Schellnhuber H. J., Nykvist B., de Wit C. A., Hughes T., van der Leeuw S., Rodhe H., Sörlin S., Snyder P. K., Costanza R., Svedin U., Falkenmark M., Karlberg L., Corell R. W., Fabry V. J., Hansen J., Walker B., Liverman D., Richardson K., Crutzen P. and Foley J. A.: ‘A safe operating space for humanity’, Nature, 2009, 461, 472–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCBD: ‘Global biodiversity outlook 3’, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal, Que., Canada 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen W., Grinevald J., Crutzen P. and McNeill J.: ‘The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives’, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 2011, 369A, 842–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnosky A. D., Hadly E. A., Bascompte J., Berlow E. L., Brown J. H., Fortelius M., Getz W. M., Harte J., Hastings A., Marquet P. A., Martinez N. D., Mooers A., Roopnarine P., Vermeij G., Williams J. W., Gillespie R., Kitzes J., Marshall C., Matzke N., Mindell D. P., Revilla E. and Smith A. B.: ‘Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere’, Nature, 2012, 486, 52–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PNUE: ‘Global environment outlook 5’, United Nations Environment Programme, Valleta, Malta 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: ‘Climate change 2013 – the physical science basis’, United Nations Environment Programme, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie F. T.: ‘Our changing planet – an introduction to Earth system science and global environmental change’, 2011, Boston, MA, Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen W., Richardson K., Rockstrom J., Cornell S. E., Fetzer I., Bennett E. M., Biggs R., Carpenter S. R., de Vries W., de Wit C. A., Folke C., Gerten D., Heinke J., Mace G. M., Persson L. M., Ramanathan V., Reyers B. and Sorlin S.: ‘Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet’, Science, 2015, 347, 1259855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apelian D.: ‘Materials science and engineering's pivotal role in sustainable development for the 21st century’, MRS Bull., 2012, 37, 318–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green M. L., Espinal L., Traversa E. and Amis E. J.: ‘Materials for sustainable development’, MRS Bull., 2012, 37, 303–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeSar R., Chen K. C. and Apelian D.: ‘Teaching sustainable development in materials science and engineering’, MRS Bull., 2012, 37, 449–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green M. L.: ‘Materials science in the Anthropocene: MRS gets serious about sustainable development’, MRS Bull., 2014, 39, 567–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson B. O., Blackledge T. A. and Hayashi C. Y.: ‘Spider capture silk: performance implications of variation in an exceptional biomaterial’, J. Exp. Biol. A, 2007, 307A, 654–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sensenig A., Agnarsson I. and Blackledge T. A.: ‘Behavioural and biomaterial coevolution in spider orb webs’, J. Evol. Biol., 2010, 23, 1839–1856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emile O., Le Floch A. and Vollrath F.: ‘Shape memory in spider draglines’, Nature, 2006, 440, 621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar B., Thakur A., Panda B. and Singh K. P.: ‘Optically probing torsional superelasticity in spider silks’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2013, 103, 201910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work R. W.: ‘Mechanisms of major ampullate silk fiber formation by orb-web-spinning spiders’, Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc., 1977, 96, 170–189.
   Google Scholar
• Work R. W. and Morosoff N.: ‘A physico-chemical study of the supercontraction of spider major ampullate silk fibers’, Text. Res. J., 1982, 52, 349–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza G. R., Guinea G. V., Pérez-Rigueiro J. and Elices M.: ‘Thermo-hygro-mechanical behavior of spider dragline silk: glassy and rubbery states’, J. Polym. Sci. B, 2006, 44B, 994–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work R. W.: ‘A comparative study of the supercontraction of major ampullate silk fibers of orb-web-building spiders (Aranae)’, J. Arachnol., 1981, 9, 299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work R. W.: ‘Dimensions, birefringences, and force-elongation behavior of major and minor ampullate silk fibers from orb-web-spinning spiders – effects of wetting on these properties’, Text. Res. J., 1977, 47, 650–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Rigueiro J., Elices M. and Guinea G. V.: ‘Controlled supercontraction tailors the tensile behaviour of spider silk’, Polymers, 2003, 44, 3733–3736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y., Sponner A., Porter D. and Vollrath F.: ‘Proline and processing of spider silks’, Biomacromolecules, 2008, 9, 116–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza G. R., Corsini P., Pérez-Rigueiro J., Marsano E., Guinea G. V. and Elices M.: ‘Effect of water on Bombyx mori regenerated silk fibers and its application in modifying their mechanical properties’, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2008, 109, 1793–1801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinea G. V., Elices M., Plaza G. R., Perea G. B., Daza R., Riekel C., Agulló-Rueda F., Hayashi C. Y., Zhao Y. and Pe´rez-Rigueiro J.: ‘Minor ampullate silks from Nephila and Argiope spiders: tensile properties and microstructural characterization’, Biomacromolecules, 2012, 13, 2087–2098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viney C.: ‘From natural silks to new polymer fibres’, J. Text. Inst., 2000, 91, 2–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakimi O., Knight D. P., Vollrath F. and Vadgama P.: ‘Spider and mulberry silkworm silks as compatible biomaterials’, Composites B, 2007, 38B, 324–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidebrecht A. and Scheibel T.: ‘Recombinant production of spider silk proteins’, in ‘Advances in applied microbiology’, (ed. Sariaslani S. et al.., 115–153; 2013, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Agnarsson I., Dhinojwala A., Sahni V. and Blackledge T. A.: ‘Spider silk as a novel high performance biomimetic muscle driven by humidity’, J. Exp. Biol., 2009, 212, 1990–1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hose G. C., James J. M. and Gray M. R.: ‘Spider webs as environmental indicators’, Environ. Pollut., 2002, 120, 725–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao-Li S., Yu P., Hose G. C., Jian C. and Feng-Xiang L.: ‘Spider webs as indicators of heavy metal pollution in air’, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2006, 76, 271–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samu F., Matthews G. A., Lake D. and Vollrath F.: ‘Spider webs are efficient collectors of agrochemical spray’, Pept. Sci., 1992, 36, 47–51.
   Google Scholar
• Widhe M., Johansson J., Hedhammar M. and Rising A.: ‘Current progress and limitations of spider silk for biomedical applications’, Biopolymers, 2012, 97, 468–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y., Hyeon-Joo K., Vunjak-Novakovic G. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials’, Biomaterials, 2006, 27, 6064–6082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhbier J. W., Allmeling C., Reimers K., Hillmer A., Kasper C., Menger B., Brandes G., Guggenheim M. and Vogt P. M.: ‘Interactions between spider silk and cells – NIH/3T3 fibroblasts seeded on miniature weaving frames’, Plos One, 2010, 5, e12032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmeling C., Jokuszies A., Reimers K., Kall S. and Vogt P. M.: ‘Use of spider silk fibres as an innovative material in a biocompatible artificial nerve conduit’, J. Cell. Mol. Med., 2006, 10, 770–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmeling C., Jokuszies A., Reimers K., Kall S., Choi C. Y., Brandes G., Kasper C., Scheper T., Guggenheim M. and Vogt P. M.: ‘Spider silk fibres in artificial nerve constructs promote peripheral nerve regeneration’, Cell Prolif., 2008, 41, 408–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao B. and Mao C.: ‘Oriented nucleation of hydroxylapatite crystals on spider dragline silks’, Langmuir, 2007, 23, 10701–10705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal-Egaña A., Lang G., Mauerer C., Wickinghoff J., Weber M., Geimer S. and Scheibel T.: ‘Interactions of fibroblasts with different morphologies made of an engineered spider silk protein’, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2012, 14, B67–B75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widhe M., Bysell H., Nystedt S., Schenning I., Malmsten M., Johansson J., Rising A. and Hedhammar M.: ‘Recombinant spider silk as matrices for cell culture’, Biomaterials, 2010, 31, 9575–9585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicka M., Hermanson O. and Rising A. U.: ‘Recombinant spider silk matrices for neural stem cell cultures’, Biomaterials, 2012, 22, 7712–7717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellynck K., Verdonk P. C. M., van Nimmen E., Almqvist K. F., Tom G., Schoukens G., Langenhove L. V., Kiekens P., Mertens J. and Verbruggen G.: ‘Silkworm and spider silk scaffolds for chondrocyte support’, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 2008, 19, 3399–3409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnarsson I., Boutry C. and Blackledge T. A.: ‘Spider silk aging: Initial improvement in a high performance material followed by slow degradation’, J. Exp. Biol. A, 2008, 309A, 494–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellynck K., Verdonk P., Forsyth R., Almqvist K. F., van Nimmen E., Gheysens T., Mertens J., Van Langenhove L., Kiekens P. and Verbruggen G.: ‘Biocompatibility and biodegradability of spider egg sac silk’, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 2008, 19, 2963–2970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluge J. A., Thurber A., Leisk G. G., Kaplan D. L. and Dorfmann A. L.: ‘A model for the stretch-mediated enzymatic degradation of silk fibers’, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2010, 3, 538–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y., Zhang Q., You R., Wang L. and Li M.: ‘The relationship between secondary structure and biodegradation behavior of silk fibroin scaffolds’, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2012, 2012, 185905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennecke K., Redeker J., Kuhbier J. W., Strauss S., Allmeling C., Kasper C., Reimer K. and Vogt P. M.: ‘Bundles of spider silk, braided into sutures, resist basic cyclic tests: potential use for flexor tendon repair’, Plos One, 2013, 8, e61100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermanson K. D., Huemmerich D., Scheibel T. and Bausch A. R.: ‘Engineered microcapsules fabricated from reconstituted spider silk’, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 1810–1815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seib F. P., Jones G. T., Rnjak-Kovacina J., Lin Y. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘pH-Dependent anticancer drug release from silk nanoparticles’, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 2013, 2, 1606–1611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammel A. S., Hu X., Park S. -H., Kaplan D. L. and Scheibel T. R.: ‘Controlling silk fibroin particle features for drug delivery’, Biomaterials, 2010, 31, 4583–4591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asakura T., Saotome T., Aytemiz D., Shimokawatoko H., Yagi T., Fukayama T., Ozaib Y. and Tanaka R.: ‘Characterization of silk sponge in the wet state using 13C solid state NMR for development of a porous silk vascular graft with small diameter’, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 4427–4434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen W., Chen J., Yin Z., Chen X., Liu H., Heng B. C., Chen W. and Ouyang H. -W.: ‘Allogenous tendon stem/progenitor cells in silk scaffold for functional shoulder repair’, Cell Transplant., 2012, 21, 943–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Q., Chen D., Yang Z. and Li M.: ‘In vitro and in vivo research on using Antheraea pernyi silk fibroin as tissue engineering tendon scaffolds’, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2009, C29, 1527–1534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J., Altman G. H., Karageorgiou V., Horan R. L., Collette A., Volloch V., Colabro T. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Human bone marrow stromal cell and ligament fibroblast responses on RGD-modified silk fibers’, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2003, 67, 559–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S., Parker S. T., Wang X., Kaplan D. L. and Lewis J. A.: ‘Direct-write assembly of microperiodic silk fibroin scaffolds for tissue engineering applications’, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2008, 18, 1883–1889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bini E., Wong Po Foo C., Huang J., Karageorgiou V., Kitchel B. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘RGD-functionalized bioengineered spider dragline silk biomaterial’, Biomacromolecules, 2006, 7, 3139–3145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes S., Numata K., Leonor I. B., Mano J. F., Reis R. L. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘AFM study of morphology and mechanical properties of a chimeric spider silk and bone sialoprotein protein for bone regeneration’, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12, 1675–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H. J., Ki C. S. and Park Y. H.: ‘Effect of RGDS and KRSR peptides immobilized on silk fibroin nanofibrous mats for cell adhesion and proliferation’, Macromol. Res., 2010, 18, 442–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos A., Gomes A. C. and Cavaco-Paulo A.: ‘Novel silk fibroin/elastin wound dressings’, Acta Biomater., 2012, 8, 3049–3060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanokpanont S., Damrongsakkul S., Ratanavaraporn J. and Aramwit P.: ‘An innovative bi-layered wound dressing made of silk and gelatin for accelerated wound healing’, Int. J. Pharm., 2012, 436, 141–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharram S. E., Zhang X., Kaplan D. L. and McCarthy S. P.: ‘Electrospun silk material systems for wound healing’, Macromol. Biosci., 2010, 10, 246–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker S. T., Domachuk P., Amsden J., Bressner J., Lewis J. A., Kaplan D. L. and Omenetto F. G.: ‘Biocompatible silk printed optical waveguides’, Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 2411–2415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D. -H., Kim Y. -S., Amsden J., Panilaitis B., Kaplan D. L., Omenetto F. G., Zakin M. R. and Rogers J. A.: ‘Silicon electronics on silk as a path to bioresorbable, implantable devices’, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2009, 95, 133701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D.-H., Viventi J., Amsden J. J., Xiao J., Vigeland L., Kim Y.-S., Blanco J. A., Panilaitis B., Frechette E. S., Contreras D., Kaplan D. L., Omenetto F. G., Huang Y., Hwang K. -C., Zakin M. R., Litt B. and Rogers J. A.: ‘Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics’, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S., Mitropoulos A. N., Spitzberg J. D., Tao H., Kaplan D. L. and Omenetto F. G.: ‘Silk inverse opals’, Nat. Photonics, 2012, 6, 818–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao H., Brenckle M. A., Yang M., Zhang J., Liu M., Siebert S. M., Averitt R. D., Mannoor M. S., McAlpine M. C., Rogers J. A., Kaplan D. L. and Omenetto F. G.: ‘Silk-based conformal, adhesive, edible food sensors’, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 1067–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi C. Y. and Lewis R. V.: ‘Evidence from flagelliform silk cDNA for the structural basis of elasticity and modular nature of spider silks’, J. Biol. Mol., 1998, 275, 773–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X., Kohlers K., Falick A. M., Moore A. M. F., Jones P. R., Sparkman O. D. and Vierra C.: ‘Egg case protein-1’, J. Biol. Chem., 2005, 280, 21220–21230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasingame E., Tuton-Blasigame T., Larkin L., Falick A. M., Zhao L., Fong J., Vaidyanathan V., Visperas A., Geurts P., Hu X., La Mattina C. and Vierra C.: ‘Pyriform spidroin 1, a novel member of the silk gene family that anchors dragline silk fibers in attachment discs of the black widow spider, Latrodectus hesperus’, J. Biol. Chem., 2009, 284, 29097–29108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittencourt D., Oliveira P. F., Prosdocimi F. and Rech E. L.: ‘Protein families, natural history and biotechnological aspects of spider silk’, Genet. Mol. Res., 2012, 11, 2360–2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kümmerlen J., van Beek J. D., Vollrath F. and Meier B. H.: ‘Local structure in spider dragline silk investigated by two-dimensional spin-diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance’, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 2920–2928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beek J. D., Hess S., Vollrath F. and Meier B. H.: ‘The molecular structure of spider dragline silk: Folding and orientation of the protein backbone’, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 2002, 99, 10266–10271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T., Rousseau M. -E. and Pézolet M.: ‘Protein secondary structure and orientation in silk as revealed by Raman spectromicroscopy’, Biophys. J., 2007, 92, 2885–2895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler S., Szela S., Avtges P., Valluzzi R., Kirschner D. A. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Designing recombinant spider silk proteins to control assembly’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1999, 24, 265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eles P. T. and Michal C. A.: ‘A DECODER NMR study of backbone orientation in Nephila clavipes dragline silk under varying strain and draw rate’, Biomacromolecules, 2004, 5, 661–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termonia Y.: ‘Molecular modeling of spider silk elasticity’, Macromolecules, 1994, 27, 7378–7381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ene R., Papadopoulos P. and Kremer F.: ‘Combined structural model of spider dragline silk’, Soft Matter, 2009, 5, 4568–4574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons A. H., Michal C. A. and Jelinski L. W.: ‘Molecular orientation and two-component nature of the crystalline fraction of spider dragline silk’, Science, 1996, 271, 84–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubb D. T. and Jelinski L. W.: ‘Fiber morphology of spider silk: the effects of tensile deformation’, Macromolecules, 1997, 30, 2860–2867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel B. L., Guess K. B. and Viney C.: ‘Non-periodic lattice crystals in the hierarchical microstructure of spider (major ampullate) silk’, Biopolymers, 1997, 41, 703–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossey S. A. and Tripathy S.: ‘Atomistic modeling of interphases in spider silk fibers’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1999, 24, 119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland G. P., Lewis R. V. and Yarger J. L.: ‘WISE NMR characterization of nanoscale heterogeneity and mobility in supercontracted Nephila clavipes spider dragline silk’, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 5867–5872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller L. D., Putthanarat S., Eby R. K. and Adams W. W.: ‘Investigation of the nanofibrillar morphology in silk fibers by small angle X-ray scattering and atomic force microscopy’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1999, 24, 159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putthanarat S., Stribeck N., Fossey S. A., Eby R. K. and Adams W. W.: ‘Investigation of the nanofibrils in silk fibers’, Polymer, 2000, 41, 7735–7747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riekel C. and Vollrath F.: ‘Spider silk fibre extrusion: combined wide- and small-angle X-ray microdiffraction experiments’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2001, 29, 203–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oroudjev E., Soares J., Arcidiacono S., Thompson J. B., Fossey S. A. and Hansma H. G.: ‘Segmented nanofibers of spider dragline silk: atomic force microscopy and single-molecule force spectroscopy’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2002, 99, 6460–6465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapede D., Seydel T., Forsyth V. T., Koza M. M., Schweins R., Vollrath F. and Riekel C.: ‘Nanofibrillar structure and molecular mobility in spider dragline silk’, Macromolecules, 2005, 38, 8447–8453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F., Holtet T., Thogersen H. C. and Frische S.: ‘Structural organization of spider silk’, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 1996, 263B, 147–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S. F. Y., McGhie A. J. and Tang S. L.: ‘New internal structure of spider dragline silk revealed by atomic force microscopy’, Biophys. J., 1994, 66, 1209–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du N., Liu X. Y., Narayanan J., Li L., Lim M. L. M. and Li D.: ‘Design of superior spider silk: from nanostructure to mechanical properties’, Biophys. J., 2006, 91, 4528–4535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frische S., Maunsbach A. B. and Vollrath F.: ‘Elongate cavities and skin-core structure in Nephila spider silk observed by electron microscopy’, J. Microsc., 1998, 189, 64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sponner A., Unger E., Grosse F. and Weisshart K.: ‘Differential polymerization of the two main protein components of dragline silk during fibre spinning’, Nat. Mater., 2005, 4, 772–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau M. E., Hernández Cruz D., West M. M., Hitchcock A. P. and Pézolet M.: ‘Nephila clavipes spider dragline silk microstructure studied by scanning transmission X-ray microscopy’, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 3897–3905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keten S. and Buehler M. J.: ‘Geometric confinement governs the rupture strength of H-bond assemblies at a critical length scale’, Nanoletter, 2008, 8, 743–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keten S., Xu Z., Ihle B. and Buehler M. J.: ‘Nanoconfinement controls stiffness, strength and mechanical toughness of β-sheet crystals in silk’, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 359–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu S., Zhang R., Wu Q., Chen T. and Sun P.: ‘Bio-inspired high-performance and recyclable cross-linked polymers’, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 4912–4917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G., Gong L., Yang Z. and Liu X. Y.: ‘What makes spider silk fibers so strong? From molecular-crystallite network to hierarchical network structures’, Soft Matter, 2014, 10, 2116–2123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter D., Guan J. and Vollrath F.: ‘Spider silk: super material or thin fibre?’, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 1275–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard-Lacroix M. and Pellerin C.: ‘Molecular orientation in electrospun fibers: from mats to single fibers’, Macromolecules, 2013, 46, 9473–9493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh R. E., Corey R. B. and Pauling L.: ‘An investigation of the structure of silk fibroin’, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1955, 16, 1–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwicker J. O.: ‘Comparative studies of fibroins. II: crystal structure of various fibroins’, J. Mol. Biol., 1960, 2, 350–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotz B. and Cesari F. C.: ‘Chemical structure and the crystalline structures of Bombyx mori silk fibroin’, Biochimie, 1979, 61, 205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie B., Viney C. and Yager P.: ‘Raman spectroscopic analysis of the secondary structure of spider silk fiber’, ACS Sympos. Ser., 1994, 544, 155–167.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons A., Ray E. and Jelinski L. W.: ‘Solid-state 13C NMR of Nephila clavipes dragline silk establishes structure and identity of crystalline regions’, Macromolecules, 1994, 27, 5235–5237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liivak O., Flores A., Lewis R. V. and Jelinski L. W.: ‘Conformation of the polyalanine repeats in minor ampullate gland silk of the spider Nephila clavipes’, Macromolecules, 1997, 30, 7127–7130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhe A. D., Seeley S. K., Gardner K., Thompson L. and Lewis R. V.: ‘Structural studies of spider silk proteins in the fiber’, J. Mol. Recognit., 1997, 10, 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier I., Leclerc J., Lefèvre T. and Auger M.: ‘Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy reveals distinctive protein dynamics in closely related spider silks’, Can. J. Chem., 2011, 89, 1047–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T. and Pézolet M.: ‘Unexpected β-sheets and molecular orientation in flagelliform spider silk as revealed by Raman spectromicroscopy’, Soft Matter, 2012, 8, 6350–6357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojić N., Bico J., Clasen C. and McKinley G. H.: ‘Ex vivo rheology of spiders’, J. Exp. Biol., 2006, 209, 4355–4362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asakura T., Umemura K., Nakazawa Y., Hirose H., Higham J. and Knight D.: ‘Some observations on the structure and function of the spinning apparatus in the silkworm Bombyx mori’, Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8, 175–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefèvre T., Boudreault S., Cloutier C. and Pézolet M.: ‘Conformational and orientational transformation of silk proteins in the major ampullate gland of Nephila clavipes spiders’, Biomacromolecules, 2008, 9, 2399–2407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight D. P., Knight M. M. and Vollrath F.: ‘Beta transition and stress-induced phase separation in the spinning of spider dragline silk’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2000, 27, 205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F., Knight D. P. and Hu X. W.: ‘Silk productrion in a spider involves acid bath treatment’, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 1998, 265B, 817–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen B., Shao Z. Z. and Vollrath F.: ‘Variability in the mechanical properties of spider silks on three levels: interspecific, intraspecific and intraindividual’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1999, 24, 301–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollrath F.: ‘Biology of spider silk’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1999, 24, 81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamires S. J., Wu C. -L. and Tso I. -M.: ‘Variation in protein intake induces variation in spider silk expression’, Plos One, 2012, 7, e31626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zax D. B., Armanios D. E., Horak S., Malowniak C. and Yang Z.: ‘Variation of mechanical properties with amino acid content in the silk of Nephila clavipes’, Biomacromolecules, 2004, 5, 732–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight D. P. and Vollrath F.: ‘Liquid crystals and flow elongation in a spider's silk production line’, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 1999, 266B, 519–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijirida D. H., Gian Do K., Michal C., Wong S., Zax D. and Jelinski L.: ‘13C NMR of Nephila clavipes major ampullate silk gland’, Biophys. J., 1996, 71, 3442–3447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X., Knight D. P. and Vollrath F.: ‘Rheological characterization of Nephila spidroin solution’, Biomacromolecules, 2002, 3, 644–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkam K., Viney C., Kaplan D. and Lombard S.: ‘Liquid crystallinity of natural silk secretions’, Nature, 1991, 349, 596–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox P. J., Gido S. P., Muller W. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Evidence of a cholesteric liquid crystalline phase in natural silk spinning process’, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 5106–5110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight D. P. and Vollrath F.: ‘Changes in element composition along the spinning duct in a Nephila spider’, Naturwissenschaften, 2001, 88, 179–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicko C., Vollrath F. and Kenney J. M.: ‘Spider silk protein refolding is controlled by changing pH’, Biomacromolecules, 2004, 5, 704–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson M., Chen G., Otikovs M., Landreh M., Nordling K., Kronqvist N., Westermark P., Joörnvall H., Knight S., Ridderstråle Y., Holm L., Meng Q., Jaudzems K., Chesler M., Johansson J. and Rising A.: ‘Carbonic anhydrase generates CO2 and H+ that drive spider silk formation via opposite effects on the terminal domains’, Plos One, 2014, 12, e1001921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X., Shao Z. and Vollrath F.: ‘The spinning processes for spider silk’, Soft Matter, 2006, 2, 448–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry A. E., Knight D. P., Porter D. and Vollrath F.: ‘pH induced changes in the rheology of silk fibroin solution from the middle division of Bombyx mori silkworm’, Biomacromolecules, 2004, 5, 768–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicko C., Kenney J. M., Knight D. and Vollrath F.: ‘Transition to a β-sheet-rich structure in spidroin in vitro: the effects of pH and cations’, Biochemistry, 2007, 43, 14080–14087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclerc J., Lefèvre T., Pottier F., Morency L. -P., Lapointe-Verreault C., Gagné S. M. and Auger M.: ‘Structure and pH-induced alterations of recombinant and natural spider silk proteins in solution’, Biopolymers, 2012, 97, 337–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclerc J., Lefèvre T., Gauthier M., Gagné S. M. and Auger M.: ‘Hydrodynamical properties of recombinant spider silk proteins: effects of pH, salts and shear, and implications for the spinning process’, Biopolymers, 2013, 99, 582–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisoldt L., Thamm C. and Scheibel T.: ‘The role of terminal domains during storage and assembly of spider silk proteins’, Biopolymers, 2012, 97, 355–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askarieh G., Hedhammar M., Nordling K., Saenz A., Casals C., Rising A., Johansson J. and Knight S. D.: ‘Self-assembly of spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH-sensitive relay’, Nature, 2010, 465, 236–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier M., Leclerc J., Lefèvre T., Gagné S. M. and Auger M.: ‘Effect of pH on the structure of the recombinant C-terminal domain of Nephila clavipes dragline silk protein’, Biomacromolecules, 2014, 15, 4447–4454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagn F., Eisoldt L., Hardy J. G., Vendrely C., Coles M., Scheibel T. and Kessler H.: ‘A conserved spider silk domain acts as a molecular switch that controls fibre assembly’, Nature, 2010, 465, 239–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig C. L., Hsu M., Kaplan D. and Pierce N. E.: ‘A comparison of the composition of silk proteins produced by spiders and insects’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1999, 24, 109–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland C., Vollrath F., Ryan A. J. and Mykhaylyk O. O.: ‘Silk and synthetic polymers: reconciling 100 degrees of separation’, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 105–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Z. and Vollrath F.: ‘Surprising strength of silkworm silk’, Nature, 2002, 418, 741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza G. R., Corsin P., Marsano E., Pérez-Rigueiro J., Biancotto L., Elices M., Riekel C., Rueda F. A., Gallardo E., Calleja J. M. and Guinea G. V.: ‘Old silks endowed with new properties’, Macromolecules, 2009, 42, 8977–8982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamires S. J., Wu C. -L., Blackledge T. A. and Tso I. -M.: ‘Post-secretion processing influences spider silk performance’, J.R. Soc. Interface, 2012, 9, 2479–2487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel A., Liivak O., Calve S., Adaska J., Ji G., Yang Z., Grubb D., Zax D. B. and Jelinski L. W.: ‘Regenerated spider silk: processing, properties, and structure’, Macromolecules, 2000, 33, 775–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao Z., Vollrath F., Yang Y. and Thøgersen H. C.: ‘Structure and behavior of regenerated spider silk’, Macromolecules, 2003, 36, 1157–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel A., Liivak O. and Jelinski L. W.: ‘Artificial spinning of spider silk’, Macromolecules, 1998, 31, 6733–6736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono S., Mello C. M., Butler M., Welsh E., Soares J. W., Allen A., Ziegler D., Laue T. and Chase S.: ‘Aqueous processing and fiber spinning of recombinant spider silks’, Macromolecules, 2002, 35, 1262–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu C., Shao Z. Z. and Vollrath F.: ‘Animal silks: their structure, properties and artificial production’, Chem. Comm., 2009, 43, 6515–6529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sashina E. S., Bochek A. M., Novoselov M. N. P. and Kirichenko D. A.: ‘Structure and solubility of natural ailk fibroin’, Russ. J. Appl. Chem., 2006, 79, 869–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada H., Nakao H., Takasu Y. and Tsubouchi K.: ‘Preparation of undegraded native molecular fibroin solution from silkworm cocoons’, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2001, C14, 41–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho H. J., Ki C. S., Oh H., Lee K. H. and Um I. C.: ‘Molecular weight distribution and solution properties of silk fibroins with different dissolution conditions’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2012, 51, 336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rising A., Widhe M., Johansson J. and Hedhammar M.: ‘Spider silk proteins: recent advances in recombinant production, structure–function relationships and biomedical applications’, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 2011, 68, 169–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabbic K. A. and Yager P.: ‘Comparative structural characterization of naturally- and synthetically-spun fibers of Bombyx mori fibroin’, Macromolecules, 1998, 31, 462–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liivak O., Blye A., Shah N. and Jelinski L. W.: ‘A microfabricated wet-spinning apparatus to spin fibers of silk proteins. Structure–property correlations’, Macromolecules, 1998, 31, 2947–2951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha S. -W., Tonelli A. E. and Hudson S. M.: ‘Structural studies of Bombyx mori silk fibroin during regeneration from solutions and wet fiber spinning’, Biomacromolecules, 2005, 6, 1722–1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinski L. W., Blye A., Liivak O., Michal C., LaVerde G., Seidel A., Shah N. and Yang Z.: ‘Orientation, structure, wet-spinning, and molecular basis for supercontraction of spider dragline silk’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1999, 24, 197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaris A., Arcidianacono S., Huang Y., Zhou J. -F., Duguay F., Chretien N., Welsh E. A., Soares J. W. and Karatzas C. N.: ‘Spider silk fibers spun from soluble recombinant silk produced in mamalian cells’, Science, 2002, 18, 472–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan J., Zhou G., Knight D. P., Shao Z. and Chen X.: ‘Wet-spinning of regenerated silk fiber from aqueous silk fibroin solution: discussion of spinning parameters’, Biomacromolecules, 2010, 11, 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie F., Zhang H., Shao H. and Hu X.: ‘Effect of shearing on formation of silk fibers from regenerated Bombyx mori fibroin aqueous solution’, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2006, 38, 284–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei W., Zhang Y., Shao H. and Hu X.: ‘Posttreatment of the dry-spun fibers obtained from regenerated silk fibroin aqueous solution in ethanol aqueous solution’, J. Mater. Res., 2011, 26, 1100–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei W., Zhang Y., Zhao Y., Shao H. and Hu X.: ‘Studies on the post-treatment of the dry-spun fibers from regenerated silk fibroin solution: post-treatment agent and method’, Mater. Des., 2012, 36, 816–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinahan M. E., Filippidi E., Köster S., Hu X., Evans H. M., Pfohl T., Kaplan D. L. and Wong J.: ‘Tunable silk: using microfluidics to fabricate silk fibers with controllable properties’, Biomacromolecules, 2011, 12, 1504–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renberg B., Andersson-Svahna H. and Hedhammar M.: ‘Mimicking silk spinning in a microchip’, Sens. Actuators, 2014, 195, 404–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel A., Burghammer M., Davies R. J., Di Cola E., Vendrely C. and Riekel C.: ‘Silk fiber assembly studied by synchrotron radiation SAXS/WAXS and Raman spectroscopy’, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 17070–17074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammensee S., Slotta U., Scheibel T. and Baush A. R.: ‘Assembly mechanism of recombinant spider silk proteins’, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 2008, 105, 6590–6595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel A., Burghammer M., Davies R. J., DiCola E., Panine P., Salmon J.-B. and Riekel C.: ‘A microfluidic cell for studying the formation of regenerated silk by synchrotron radiation small- and wide-angle X-ray scattering’, Biomicrofluidics, 2008, 2, 024104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teulé F., Miaob Y.-G., Sohn B.-H., Kim Y.-S., Hull J. J., Fraser J., Malcolm J., Lewis R. V. and Jarvis D. L.: ‘Silkworms transformed with chimeric silkworm/spider silk genes spin composite silk fibers with improved mechanical properties’, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 2012, 109, 923–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elices M., Guinea G. V., Plaza G. R., Karatzas C. N., Riekel C., Agullo-Rueda F., Daza R. and Pérez-Rigueiro J.: ‘Bioinspired fibers follow the track of natural spider silk’, Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 1166–1176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G., Shao Z., Knight D. P., Yan J. and Chen X.: ‘Silk fibers extruded artificially from aqueous solutions of regenerated Bombyx mori silk fibroin are tougher than their natural counterparts’, Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 366–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slota U., Mougin N., Römer L. M. and Leimer A. H.: ‘Synthetic spider silk proteins and threads’, Chem. Eng. Prog., 2012, 108, 43–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humenik M., Smith A. M. and Scheibel T.: ‘Recombinant spider silks – biopolymers with potential for future applications’, Polymer, 2011, 3, 640–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferchault de Réaumur R.-A.: ‘Examen de la soie des araignées’. Mémoires de l'académie royale des Sciences 1710, 386–408. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb32786820s/date.
   Google Scholar
• Scheibel T.: ‘Spider silks: recombinant synthesis, assembly, spinning, and engineering of synthetic proteins’, Microbiol. Cell Fact., 2004, 3, 14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendrely C. and Scheibel T.: ‘Biotechnological production of spider-silk proteins enables new applications’, Biomacromol. Biosci., 2007, 7, 401–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono S., Mello C., Kaplan D. L., Cheley S. and Bayley H.: ‘Purification and characterization of recombinant spider silk expressed in Escherichia coli’, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1998, 49, 31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince J. T., McGrath K. P., DiGirolamo J. C. M. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Construction, cloning, and expression of synthetic genes encoding spider dragline silk’, Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 10879–10885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis R. V., Hinman M. B., Kothakota S. and Fournier M. J.: ‘Expression and purification of a spider silk protein: a new strategy for producing repetitive proteins’, Protein Expression Purif., 1996, 7, 400–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark M., Grip S., Rising A., Hedhammar M., Engström W., Hjälm G. and Johansson J.: ‘Macroscopic fibers self-assembled from recombinant miniature spider silk proteins’, Biomacromolecules, 2007, 8, 1695–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahnestock S. R. and Bedzyk A.: ‘Production of synthetic spider dragline silk protein in Pichia pastoris’, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1997, 47, 33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheller J., Gührs K. -H., Grosse F. and Conrad U.: ‘Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato’, Nat. Biotechnol., 2001, 19, 573–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menassa R., Zhu H., Karatzas C. N., Lazaris A., Richman A. and Brandle J.: ‘Spider dragline silk proteins in transgenic tobacco leaves: accumulation and field production’, Plant Biotechnol. J., 2004, 2, 431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J., Barr L. A., Fahnestock S. R. and Liu Z.-B.: ‘High yield recombinant silk-like protein production in transgenic plants through protein targeting’, Transgenic Res., 2005, 14, 313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huemmerich D., Scheibel T., Vollrath F., Cohen S., Gat U. and Ittah S.: ‘Novel assembly properties of recombinant spider dragline silk proteins’, Curr. Biol., 2004, 14, 2070–2074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu H.-T., Fan B.-L., Lian Z. X., Dai Y.-P., Wang L.-L., Liu Z.-L., Fei J. and Li N.: ‘Construct synthetic gene encoding artificial spider dragline silk protein and its expression in milk of transgenic mice’, Anim. Behav., 2007, 18, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hauptmann V., Weichert N., Rakhimova M. and Conrad U.: ‘Spider silks from plants – a challenge to create native-sized spidroins’, Biotechnol. J., 2013, 8, 1183–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoub N. A., Garb J. E., Tinghitella R. M., Collin M. A. and Hayashi C. Y.: ‘Blueprint for a high-performance biomaterial: full-length spider dragline silk genes’, Plos One, 2007, 6, e514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia X. -X., Qiana Z. -G., Kib C. S., Park Y. H., Kaplan D. and Lee S. Y.: ‘Native-sized recombinant spider silk protein produced in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli results in a strong fiber’, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 2010, 107, 10459–14063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spieß K., Wohlrab S. and Scheibel T.: ‘Structural characterization and functionalization of engineered spider silk films’, Soft Matter, 2010, 6, 4168–4174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M., Kawamura J., Zhu Z., Yamauchi K. and Asakura T.: ‘Development of silk-like materials based on Bombyx mori and Nephila clavipes dragline silk fibroins’, Polymers, 2009, 50, 117–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ude A. U., Eshkoor R. A., Zulkifili R., Ariffin A. K., Dzuraidah A. W. and Azhari C. H.: ‘Bombyx mori silk fibre and its composite: a review of contemporary developments’, Mater. Des., 2014, 57, 298–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratanavaraporn J., Kanokpanont S. and Damrongsakkul S.: ‘The development of injectable gelatin/silk fibroin microspheres for the dual delivery of curcumin and piperine’, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med., 2014, 25, 401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin J., Hassanzadeh P., Perotto G., Sun W., Brenckle M. A., Kaplan D., Omenetto F. G. and Marco R.: ‘A biomimetic composite from solution self-assembly of chitin nanofibers in a silk fibroin matrix’, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 4482–4487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie H. A., Deschaume O., Naik R. R., Perry C. C. and Kaplan D. L.: ‘Genetically engineered chimeric silk–silver binding proteins’, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2011, 21, 2889–2895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei X., Jia M., Du X., Yang Y., Zhang R., Shao Z., Zhao X. and Chen X.: ‘Green synthesis of silk fibroin–silver nanoparticle composites with effective antibacterial and biofilm-disrupting properties’, Biomacromolecules, 2013, 14, 4483–4488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramón A., Señorale-Pose M. and Marín M.: ‘Inclusion bodies: not that bad…’, Front. Microbiol., 2014, 5, 56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebendiker M. and Danieli T.: ‘Production of prone-to-aggregate proteins’, FEBS Lett., 2014, 588, 236–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Safety in Biotechnology Working Party of the European Federation of Biotechnology: ‘Safe biotechnology. 10: DNA content of biotechnological process waste’, Trends Biotechnol., 2000, 18, 141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiienzi M., Assi F., Chmiel A., Collins C. H., Donikian M., Dominguez J. B., Financsek L., Fogarty L. M., Frommer W., Hasko F., Hovland J., Houwink E. H., Mahler J. L., Sandkvist A., Sargeant K., Sloover C. and Tuijnenburg Muijs G.: ‘Safe biotechnology. General considerations’, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 1985, 21, 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization: ‘Statistical yearbook’, 2013, Rome, FAO.
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter O.: ‘The transformative potential of the right to food’, 2014;. http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20140310_finalreport_en.pdf (accessed 22 July 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization: ‘World agriculture: towards 2015/2030 – an FAO perspective’, 2003, London, FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization: ‘Livestock's long shadow – environmental issues and options’, 2006, ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/005/y4252E/y4252e.pdf (accessed 26 November 2014) Rome, FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Machovina B. and Feely K. J.: ‘Taking a bite out of biodiversity’, Science, 2014, 343, 838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringezu S., O'Brien M. and Schütz H.: ‘Beyond biofuels: assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass: a conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources’, Land Use Policy, 2012, 29, 224–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal R.: ‘Soil science and the carbon civilization’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 2007, 71, 1425–1437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomiero T., Paoletti M. G. and Pimentel D.: ‘Biofuels: efficiency, ethics, and limits to human appropriation of ecosystem services’, J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 2010, 23, 403–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra A. Y. and Mekonnen M. M.: ‘The water fooprint of humanity’, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 2011, 109, 3232–3237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Water Assessment Programme: ‘Water in a changing world’, 2009, London, UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero M., Havlík P., Valin H., Notenbaert A., Rufino M., Thornton P. K., Blümmel M., Weiss F., Grace D. and Obersteiner M.: ‘Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems’, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 2013, 52, 20888–20893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen H., Lan X., Zhang Y., Zhao T., Wang Y., Kajiura Z. and Nakagaki M.: ‘Transgenic silkworms (Bombyx mori) produce recombinant spider dragline silk in cocoons’, Mol. Biol. Rep., 2010, 37, 1815–1821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita M.: ‘Transgenic silkworms that weave recombinant proteins into silk cocoons’, Biotechnol. Lett., 2011, 33, 645–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvihill D. M. and Kinsella J. E.: ‘Gelation characteristics of whey proteins and β-lactoglobulin’, Food Technol., 1987, 41, 102–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella J. E. and Whitehead D. M.: ‘Proteins in whey: chemical, physical, and functional properties’, in ‘Advances in food and nutrition research’, (ed. Kinsella J. E.), ; 1989, San Diego, CA, Academic Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler G. R. and Foegeding E. A.: ‘The gelation of proteins’, in ‘Advances in food and nutrition research’, (ed. Kinsella J. E.); 1990, San Diego, CA, Academic Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Poole A. J., Church J. S. and Huson M. G.: ‘Environmentally sustainable fibers from regenerated protein’, Biomacromolecules, 2009, 10, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L. Y., Remondetto G. E. and Subirade M.: ‘Food protein-based materials as nutraceutical delivery systems’, Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2006, 17, 272–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan C. and Pochan D. J.: ‘Rheological properties of peptide-based hydrogels for biomedical and other applications’, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 3528–3540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonker A. M., Loewik D. W. P. M. and van Hest J. C. M.: ‘Peptide- and protein-based hydrogels’, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24, 759–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuskes P. M., Tuttle J. P. and Collins M. M.: ‘Rearing’ ‘The wild silk moths of North America: the natural History of the Saturniidae of the United States and Canada’, 1996, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prempree A., Chantachon S. and Wannajun S.: ‘The integration of traditional knowledge in the design and development of mudmee, praewa and yok tong silk products for enhancing community economy’, Indian J. Trad. Knowledge, 2014, 13, 305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegst U. G. K., Bai H., Saiz E., Tomsia A. P. and Ritchie R. O.: ‘Bioinspired structural materials’, Nat. Mater., 2014, 14, 23–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosoy N., Brown P. G., Bosselmann K., Duraiappah A., Mackey B., Martinez-Alier J., Rogers D. and Thomson R.: ‘Pillars for a flourishing Earth: planetary boundaries, economic growth delusion and green economy’, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustainability, 2012, 4, 74–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner T., Ibarrola Rivas M. J., Koch W. and Nonhebel S.: ‘Global changes in diets and the consequences for land requirements for food’, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci., 2012, 109, 6868–6872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcott B.: ‘Jevons' paradox’, Ecol. Econ., 2005, 54, 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polimeni J. M. and Polimeni R. I.: ‘Jevons' paradox and the myth of technological liberation’, Ecol. Complexity, 2006, 3, 344–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen R. C.: ‘Global economic history – a very short introduction’, 2011, New York, Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Griethuysen P.: ‘Why are we growth-addicted?The hard way towards degrowth in the involutionary western development path’, J. Cleaner Prod., 2010, 18, 590–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper (Ed.) R. G.: ‘Technological assessment – understanding the social consequences of technological applications’, 293; 1972, New York, Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie D. and Wajcman (Eds) J.: ‘The social shaping of technology’, (ed. MacKenzie D. et al.), ; 1985, Philadelphia, PA, Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen T.: ‘On the nature of capital; investments, intangible assets and the pecuniary magnate’, Quat. J. Econ., 1908, 23, 104–136.
   Google Scholar
• Smith B., Baron N., English C., Galindo H., Goldman E., McLeod K., Miner M. and Neeley E.: ‘COMPASS: navigating the rules of scientific engagement’, Plos Biol., 2013, 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of the Planet Declaration: ‘Planet under pressure: new knowledge towards solutions’. Proc. Conf. on ‘Planet under pressure’, 2012. http://www.planetunderpressure2012.net/pdf/state_of_planet_declaration.pdf (accessed 22 July 2015).
   Google Scholar