Phonophoresis of non-steroidal drugs: a review of the clinical evidence

References

• Byl N. The use of ultrasound as enhancer for transcutaneous drug delivery; phonophoresis. Phys Ther 1995; 75: 539–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asano J, Suisha F, Takada M, Myasaki S. Effect of pulsed output ultrasound on the transdermal absorption of indometacin from an ointment in rats. Biol Pharm Bull 1997; 20: 288–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persegani C, Russo P, Lugaresi E, Nicolini M, Torlini M. Neuroprotective effects of low-dose aspirin. Hum Psychopharmacol 2001; 16: 193–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagnie B, Vinck E, Rimbaut S, Vanderstraeten G. Phonophoresis versus topical application of ketoprofen: comparison between tissue and plasma levels. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 707–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazanoglu E, Basaran S, Guzel R, Guler F. Short term efficacy of ibuprofen phonophoresis versus continuous ultrasound therapy in knee osteoarthritis. Swiss Med Weekly 2003; 133: 332–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosim G, Barbieri C, Lancas F, Mazzer N. Diclofenac phonophoresis in human volunteers. UltrasoundMed Biol 2003; 31: 337–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machet L, Boucaud A. Transdermal transport by phonophoresis. Drugs Pharm Sci 2005; 155: 739–758.
   Google Scholar
• Kost J, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Phonophoresis. Basic Clin Dermatol 2002; 21: 335–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeke P, Parizotto N, Carrinho P, Salate AC. Comparative study of the efficacy of the topical application of hydrocortisone phonophoresis on tissue repair in rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005; 31: 345–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machet L, Cochelin N, Patat F. In vitro phonophoresis of mannitol, oestradiol and hydrocortisone across hairless mouse and human skin. Int J Pharmacol 1998; 65: 169–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machet L, Pinton J, Patat F. In vitro phonophoresis of digoxin across hairless mice and human skin: thermal effects of ultrasound. Int J Pharm 1996; 133: 39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson VJ, Baker KG A review of therapeutic ultrasound: effectiveness studies. Phys Ther 2001; 81: 1339–1350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, van den Berg SG, ter Rief G, deWinter AF, Bouter LM. Ultrasound therapy for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Pain 1999; 81: 257–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay D, Dearness J, McGinley C. Electrotherapy usage trends in private physiotherapy practice. Phys Ther Canada 1995; 47: 30–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haar G. Basic physics of therapeutic ultrasound. Physiotherapy 1987; 73: 110–113.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett D, Richardson W, Rosenberg W, Haynes R. Evidence based Medicine: How to practice and teach, 2nd edn. New York: Churchill Livingston, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Moore R, Tramer M, Carroll D, Wiffen P, McQuay H. Quantitative systematic review of topically applied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. BMJ 1998; 316: 333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Prescribing Centre. Topical non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Circular release. London NPC, 1997; 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. MeReC Bull 1997; 8: 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Anon. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. MeReC Bull 1991; 2: 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Grahame R. Transdermal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Br J Clin Pract 1995; 49: 33–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Health Service. An excellent choice for the treatment of mild arthritis and traumatic conditions. London: NHS J for Healthcare Professionals, May 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahams S. Topical non steroidal anti inflammatories, the evidence. Br Assoc Sports Rehabil Ther J 2003; 5: 2–5
   Google Scholar
• Airaksinen O, Venalainen J, Pietilainen T. Ketoprofen 2.5% gel versus placebo gel in the treatment of acute soft tissue injuries. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1993; 31: 561–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kageyama T. A double-blinded placebo controlled multi-centre study of piroxicam 0.5% gel osteoarthritis of the knee. Eur J Rheum Inflam 1987; 8: 114–115.
   Google Scholar
• Russell A. Piroxicam 0.5% topical gel compared top placebo in the treatment of acute soft tissue injuries: a double blinded study comparing the efficacy and safety. Clin Invest Med 1991; 14: 35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh N, Steuber U. Dolgit cream in accident and sports related injuries in medical practice, results of a double-blinded study. Therapiewolche 1983; 33: 4563–4570.
   Google Scholar
• Duerden M, Barton S, Johnstone E, MacLean K, Underhill J, Walley T. Topical NSAIDs are better than placebo. BMJ 1998; 317: 67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duerden M, Barton S, Johnstone E, MacLean K, Underhill J. Topical NSAIDs are better than placebo. Safety, efficacy, and therapeutic role of nsaids must be clarified ... BMJ 1998 ncbi.nlm.nih,gov, BMJ 1998; 317: 280–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbury R, Shuttleworth P, Rapier C. A multi centre post marketing surveillance study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of felbinac 3% gel in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders in general practice. Eur J Clin Res 1992; 3: 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Scott E, Briggs A, Henning C. Patient survey on topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Pharm J 1995; 35: 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Muller M, Mascher H, Kikuta C. Diclofenac concentrations in defined tissue layers after topical administration. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997; 62: 293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Scudds R. Iontophoresis, an overview of the mechanisms and clinical application. Arthritis Care Res 1995; 8: 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinkort J, Wood F. Phonophoresis with 1% versus 10% hydrocortisone. Phys Ther 1975; 55: 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S, Edwards D, Blankschtein D, Langer R. A mechanistic study of ultrasonically enhanced transdermal drug delivery. J Pharm Sci 1995; 84: 697–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts D. Transdermal drug delivery using iontophoresis and phonophoresis. Orthop Nurs 1999; May/June.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel V, Kimmel E, Iger Y. Ultrasound induced intercellular space widening in fish epidermis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26: 1295–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy D, Kost J, Langer R. Effect of ultrasound on transdermal drug delivery to rats and guinea pigs. J Clin Invest 1989; 83: 2074–2088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEnlay J, Benson H, Harland R. Phonophoresis of methyl nicotinate. Pharm Res 1993; 4: 1726–1731.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas S, Singh R, Asati R. Liposomally encapsulated diclofenac for sonophoresis induced systematic delivery. J Microencapsulation 1995; 21: 149–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meidan V, Docker M, Walmley A, Irwin W. Phonophoresis of hydrocortisone with enhancers; an acoustically defined model. Int J Pharmacol 1998; 170: 157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brucks R, Nanavaty M, Jung D, Siegel F. The effect of ultrasound on ibuprofen through human epidermis. Pharm Res 1989; 6: 697–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelucio-Lopes C, Machet L, Milliant L, Patat F. Phonophoresis of azidothymidine ex vivo across human and hairless mice skin. Int J Pharmacol 1993; 96: 249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hikima T, Hirai Y, Tojo K. The effect of ultrasound application on skin metabolism of prednisolone 21 acetate. Pharm Res 1998; 15: 1680–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Mitragotri S, Patel A, Blankschstein D, Langer R. Synergistic effects of chemical enhancers and therapeutic ultrasound on transdermal drug delivery. J Pharm Sci 1996; 85: 670–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S. Effect of therapeutic ultrasound on partition and diffusion coefficient in human stratum corneum. J Control Release 2001; 71: 23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng C, Ng GYF, See E. Therapeutic ultrasound improves strength of Achilles tendon repair in rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1501–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin S, Choi J. Effect of indometacin phonophoresis in the relief of TMJ pain. Cranio 1997; 15: 348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlak T. Comparative study of the efficacy of ultrasound and sonophoresis in the treatment of painful shoulder syndrome. Reumatizam 1999; 46: 5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klaiman M, Shrader J, Danoff J, Hicks J, Pesce W, Ferland J. Phonophoresis versus ultrasound in the treatment of common musculoskeletal conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar