Dynamic ultrasound tests for antero-superior shoulder impingement syndrome: An inter-examiner reliability study

References

• Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? Brit J Sports Med 2009;43(4):259–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roquelaure Y, Ha C, Leclerc A, Touranchet A, Sauteron M, Melchior M, et al. Epidemiologic surveillance of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in the working population. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55(5):765–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Jt Surg 1972;54(1):41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neer CS. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1983;173:70–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Cuomo F. The influence of coracoacromial arch anatomy on rotator cuff tears. J Should Elbow Surg 1992:1(1):4–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longo UG, Berton A, Ahrens PM, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Clinical tests for the diagnosis of rotator cuff disease. Sports Med Arthrosc 2011;19(3):266–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly SM, Brittle N, Allen GM. The value of physical tests for subacromial impingement syndrome: a study of diagnostic accuracy. Clin Rehabil 2010;24(2):149–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudreuil J, Nizard R, Thomas T, Peyre M, Liotard JP, Boileau P, et al. Contribution of clinical tests to the diagnosis of rotator cuff disease: a systematic literature review. Joint Bone Spine 2009;76(1):15–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu CF, Hodge DK, Bergman AG. Glenohumeral relationships during physiologic shoulder motion and stress testing: initial experience with open MR imaging and active imaging-plane registration. Radiology 1999;212(3):699–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graichen H, Bonel H, Stammberger T, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Subacromial space width changes during abduction and rotation: a 3-D MR imaging study. Surg Radiol Anat 1999;21(1):59–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent K. Dynamic ultrasound in the diagnosis of antero-superior impingement of the shoulder: a literature review. Int Musculoskel Med 2013;35:141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Neer CS, Welsh RP. The shoulder in sports. Orthop Clin N Am 1977;8:583–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins RJ, Kennedy JC. Impingement syndrome in athletics. Am J Sports Med 1980;8:151–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor D, Poanta L, Felea I, Rednic S, Bolosiu H. Shoulder impingement syndrome: correlations between clinical tests and ultrasonographic findings. Ortop traumatol rehabil 2009;11(2):120–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies. Phys Ther 2005;85(3):257–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20(1):27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lew HL, Chen CPC, Wang T-G, Chew KTL. Introduction to musculoskeletal diagnostic ultrasound: examination of the upper limb. Am J Med Rehabil 2007;86(4):310–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Connor PJ, Rankine J, Gibbon WW, Richardson A, Winter F, Miller JH. Interobserver variation in sonography of the painful shoulder. J Clin Ultrasound 2005;33(2):53–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson JA, Lancaster S, Prasad A, Van Holsbeeck MT, Kolowich P. Full thickness and partial thickness tear: value of US signs in diagnosis. Radiology 2004;230(1):234–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold CJ, Mallisee TA, Erickson SJ, Boynton MD, Raasch WG, Timins ME. Rotator cuff: evaluation with US and MR imaging. Radiographics 1999;19(3):685–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum A, Feldmann L, Bresler F, Jouanny P, Briançon S, Régent D. Intérêt du calcum du coefficient Kappa dans l'évaluation d'une méthode d'imagerie. J Radiol 1995;76(7):441–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brasseur JL, Zeitoun-Eiss D, Renous J, Mercy G, Grenier P. Intérêt du test de Brasseur de la conflit sous-acromial. In: Masson E (ed.), Actualités en échographie de l'appareil locomoteur. Paris: Sauramps Médica; 2012, pp. 103–5.
   Google Scholar